dolf
2019-02-23 22:31:28 UTC
-- PART THREE ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR
COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 24 February, 2019
We begin PART 3 of this FILING SUBMISSION by making a further
explanation to what has been stated previously within PARTS 1 and 2 of
this document, that in whatever circumstance such as the instance
conveyed below of IDEA @311 constituting a SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN IMPETUS OF 3 APRIL 33 AD MADE AGAINST THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED WITHIN 1783 AND DUE TO HIS FORMER RELIGIOUS
EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE SPECTRUM AS
HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING WHICH ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS
COMPRISING THE INTELLECTUAL TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
+ #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL
APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER* ITSELF:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
As to being a duplicitous redefinition and thereby a logical fallacy,
which is nevertheless capable of being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for delivery and staging that is
accorded entirely by my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as being sapient
encapsulation provisioned by the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE utilising a DATA SET
comprising #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 = #364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as
being only a SUB-SET of the available LEXICON gnosis constituting some
14,298 RECORDS.
We have now met that requirement for the development of some additional
program functions against the originating DATA SET. Before then
commencing (ie. as concluded with the publishing data of 38Mb upon 20
February 2019} the actual process of regenerating into aggregated
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING our wholsitic 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE
OBJECTS comprising the individual LEXICON JSON resource files and making
them available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>
Noting that the GEMATRIA {ie. as having the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3373
v's #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY} / UMBRA {ie. as having the
*ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3260} and not #800 as false presupposition being
the threshold having equivalence to the *ORDINAL* value of 26th letter
to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages, suggesting that there is a
probable CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus made against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS by the SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30
NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE from otherwise LATIN / ARABIC or OTHER BINOMIAL
LINGUISTIC GROUPS by its pantomime and regular patterning which
undertaken by INTERNET MILITIA is intentioned upon #325 {MAGIC SUM OF
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5,
#9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] =
paradidomi (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
@1: "to give into the hands (of another)",
@2: "to give over into (one's) power or use",
@2a: "to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage",
@2b: "to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished,
scourged, tormented, put to death",
@2c: "to deliver up treacherously",
@2c1: "by betrayal to cause one to be taken",
@2c2: "to deliver one to be taught, moulded",
@2d: "to commit, to commend",
@2e: "to deliver verbally",
@2e1: "commands, rites",
@2e2: "*TO* *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, to report",
@2f: "to permit allow",
@2f1: "when the fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits",
@2f2: "gives itself up, presents itself"
Due to the gravitas and propensity of such becoming an acute and risky
precipice consideration in the circumstance of the CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING #273 as *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY*
in my view the *ISOPSEPHIC* extents of the GEMATRIA {ie. the
*ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3373 v's #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY} /
UMBRA {ie. as having the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3260 and not #800 as
false presupposition} as threshold in having an equivalence to the
*ORDINAL* value of 26th letter to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages
AS THEN CAUSAL FOR OUR INVESTIGATION INTO THE EUROPEAN UNION NOTION OF
STATE AS HYPOTHETICAL OF IT BEING IN GREAT AND IMMANENT PERIL SUCH THAT
I ENVISIONED THERE WILL BE RENEWED IMPETUS FOR NEGOTIATED COOPERATION
DURING BREXIT:
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
{29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION
OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH
{#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
#111 % #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b)
the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for
this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment)
It also includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in
adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing
passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b)
chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for
their amendment);
And thusly my reasonable objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 -
substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 - WREATHS & SOVEREIGNTY / #288
- MEMORIAL & ANTI-SEMITISM / #419 - SLAUGHTER} war dead and usurping the
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOGENEOUS basis to our Commonwealth's
Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 /
#21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent {
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
} as the instrumentation of Federation into a nation.
WHICH MIGHT REASONABLY AND PREDICTABLY BE CONSIDERED THAT THE *PRO*
*DOMO* *VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* IS A PERVERSE AND DELIBERATE
SEDITION {#444 - *SPORT* OF COMBAT} BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO THE
AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION) {
@65 {*SOLDIER*} - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
} AGAINST BOTH THE PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION (#364 - ENQUIRY) {
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81
} AND PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - CONTRADICTION) {
@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27
} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND THE PROBITY OF JUDGES
WITHIN AUSTRALIA AS TO WHY ONE CANNOT GET ANY CONSIDERATION OF JUSTICE
FOR ADHERING TO THESE TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLES WHICH ALL INHABITANTS MUST
ADHERE *TO* *AS* FIRST PRINCIPLES OF EXISTENCE AS THAT WHICH OUGHT TO
PROCEED BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE *AND* *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *OUR* *JUDICIAL*
*SYSTEM* WHOM UNDER SECTION III the "GOVERNOR GENERAL MAY CONSTITUTE AND
APPOINT, IN OUR NAME AND ON OUR BEHALF, ALL SUCH JUDGES, COMMISSIONERS,
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, AND OTHER NECESSARY OFFICERS AND MINISTERS OF OUR
SAID COMMONWEALTH, AS MAY BE *LAWFULLY* *CONSTITUTED* OR APPOINTED BY
US" IN ACCORD WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY
PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE ✡️ / ☯️ #164 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY = #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)
BEING ORGANISATION AS PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY FOR #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) {@175 {*MARRIAGE*} - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 -
ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS
FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 =
107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #6 x #364 = #2184:
#1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
#175 {*MARRIAGE*} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL {DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)} {#5 -
last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 - Granting forgiveness}
(1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY}]) / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature:
{DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature} [#175
{*MARRIAGE*} / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature] ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD: *PAPAL* *BREACHES* *OF* *SOVEREIGNTY*
*BY* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *SOLAR* *ECLIPSE* 9 JUNE 2018]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) *AN* *ENCOMPASSING*, *COMPASS*, *CIRCUIT*;
2) that which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS
QUEEN VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 -
FREEDOM from #1827 - OPPRESSION which is derived from a LOGICAL fallacy
in being reliant upon the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #800 as threshold for
its CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus made against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #284 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#289 as [#5, #70, #9, #200, #5] = `atarah (H5850): {UMBRA: #7 as #284 %
#41 = #38} 1) *CROWN*, *WREATH*;
ARE BESTOWING ONLY A CONTEMPT BY IGNORANCE AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT AS PRESENTS {ie.
HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12] as
*GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} BY AN *INCESSANT* *SOCIAL* *ENGINEERING* WHICH IS
HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {
+0, 27, 54,
+0, 9, 18,
+0, 3, 6,
+1, 2, 3
@1 {#1 - HEAR, O ISRAEL; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD [Mark 12:29]} +
@2 {#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} +
@3 {#81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION} +
@4 {#369 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTÀTIS} =
@10 {#492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #12 = #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} <—
IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON
} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE* ENTITLEMENT RIGHT
} BEING SELF JUSTIFICATIONS IN AND OF THEMSELVES {
@1 {#1 - HEAR, O ISRAEL; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD [Mark 12:29]} +
@2 {#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} +
@3 {#81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} +
@5 {#369 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTÀTIS} =
@15 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO CENSURE / #41 = #15
- PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY}
Just as little can the cosmological ideas of the beginning of the world
or the eternity of the world {*A* *PARTE* *ANTE* and its converse: *A*
*PARTE* *POST*} help us to explain any event in the world itself.
CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
CIRCULARITY?:
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
{
"derivation" : "from G5143 (τροχός);",
"kjv_def" : "course",
"lemma" : "τροχός",
"frequency" : 1,
"strongs_def" : " a wheel (as a runner), i.e. (figuratively) a circuit
of physical effects",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a wheel"
},
"strongs" : "G5164",
"xlit" : "trochós",
"umbra" : {
"1340" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"1190" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70, 50], "1340" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70,
200]
}
},
{
"derivation" : "from the same as G1074 (γένεσις);",
"kjv_def" : "generation, nature(-ral)",
"lemma" : "γένεσις",
"frequency" : 5,
"strongs_def" : " nativity; figuratively, nature",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "source, origin",
"@1a" : "a book of one's lineage, i.e. in which his ancestry or
progeny are enumerated",
"@2" : "used of birth, nativity",
"@3" : "of that which follows origin, viz. existence, life",
"@3a" : "the wheel of life (Jas 3:6), other explain it, the wheel of
human origin which as soon as men are born begins to run, i.e. its
course of life"
},
"strongs" : "G1078",
"xlit" : "génesis",
"umbra" : {
"473" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 10, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"473" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 10, 200], "1268" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 5,
800, 200]
}
}
Which Immanuel Kant has cautioned against in accordance with a correct
maxim of natural philosophy, we must refrain from all explanations of
the organization of nature drawn from the will of a supreme being,
because this is no longer natural philosophy but an admission that we
have come to the end of it.
*JEWISH* *CHRONOLOGICAL* / *MATHEMATICAL* *VIEW* *OF* *NATURAL* /
*COMMON* *AND* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW* *AS* *SYLLOGISTIC* *MICROCOSM*
Being constituted by the three higher numbers of the Decade and which
stand for the invisible and metempirical philosophical and metaphysical
theology as the Torah's which is an Intellectual Property to an AUTONOMY
OF WILL conveying the claim of Natural and Common Law as the Universal
basis to an egalitarian right derived from a legitimate cosmogonic
perspective establishing the existence of a sovereign autonomous right
to govern which is expressed lawfully by a logical syllogism by the
first three 3 ordinance statements of the 10 Commandments.
In English, Natural Law is a term is frequently employed as equivalent
to the laws of nature, meaning the order which governs the activities of
the material universe:
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
"AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, 'I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
BEFORE ME..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
AS BEING A VALID LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
"... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND *FOURTH* GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE
ME; AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
COMMANDMENTS..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
4. FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW AS SOVEREIGNTY / *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
{3W1D}
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80 - Serug {Branch, Layer; twining}]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30 - Arphaxad {I shall fail as the breast:
he cursed the breast-bottle, A healer; a releaser}]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7 - Enoch {Initiated. Figuratively to
initiate or discipline; dedicate, train up}]
5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2 - Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God
has heard my prayer and has delivered me out of affliction. Power &
Strength; put; who puts; fixed}]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100 - Terah {Station, delay, a station of
Israel in the wilderness, To breathe; scent; blow}]
6. FORMULA OF AUTONOMY AS INDIVIDUAL / *DO* *NOT* *KILL*
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50 - Heber {The region beyond, One that
passes; anger}]
7. FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *AVOID* *SPIRITUAL* *ADULTERY* *AS*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* {CIRCA 49J7W} [John 5:43-47]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9 - Lamech {Powerful, Poor; made low}]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4 - Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively
a chamber or dwelling:-nest, room), buyer; owner}]
8. DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) AS OBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY
/ *DO* *NOT* *STEAL* {72J + 3(3²+1)/2}
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300 - Isaac {He laughs}]
9. BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?) AS FAUX SUBJECTIVE
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
"Infinity itself is the actual Logos as concept. Both the 'logical' and
the 'subjective' grounding of infinity--as we call them in short--are
already carried out in the thoroughly concrete investigation ... [and
found that] everything [was] still at the beginning and is more within
the scope of a confrontation with tradition; it has not yet found its
own necessary shape.
This happens for the first time in the 'System of Science' {ie. The
science, whose system is at issue, is the totality of the highest and
most essential knowledge as philosophy--The way in which philosophy
unfolds itself as absolute knowledge. By providing all sciences with
their foundation, philosophy must certainly be a science}, whose first
part, the Phenomenology, represents the grounding we mentioned as our
2nd point (the grounding of infinity in the subject and as subject),
while the second part, the Logic, implements the 1st grounding that we
mentioned above (the logical grounding), which is inherently and
necessarily grounded in the 2nd one." [Martin Heidegger (1889-1976 CE),
'Mediatedness & the Dialectical Movement' on 'Hegel's Phenomenology of
Spirit', p 78]
THE LOGOS AS THE FAUX LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#AYIN / #70 - Reu {Friend, His friend; his shepherd}
as 'eye', 'to see', and by extension, to understand and obey, it
represents the primeval light, that is the spiritual light of God
[Genesis 1:3] as distinct to the celestial lights [Genesis 1:14-18]] =
#0 CE as BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?) AS FAUX LOGICAL
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS* *BY*
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN &
WICKEDNESS?) being a binary (ie. gender and spermatic as bifurcated
entities) unnatural autonomic transformative prototype imposed upon the
biological natural order and commences the symbolic associator series as
the MACROCOSM:
#15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE, #111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20 - Shem {Exhalted Name, Name, renown}] =
#400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6 - Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding;
coming down}] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1 - Adam {Taken from 4 corners, Earthy;
red}] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90 - Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}] =
#1600 CE
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
"...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
10. MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA DENUNTIANS) / *DO* *NOT* *COVET* {122J3W1D +
9(9²+1)/2}
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses} as waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the
spring of Torah being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = #2000 Y2K /
Equinox of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 + (5 *
364) + 182 days = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
THE LOGOS AS THE SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY IN THE SUBJECT AND AS
MY BESTOWED ETERNITY
The ENNEAD of THOTH as Anthropic Cosmological Principle appears
equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8 - Methuselah {Man of the dart/javelin
(weapon, missile, sprout), He has sent his death}]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3 - Enosh {Husband, (certain, mortal) man;
sick; despaired of; forgetful}]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200 - Abraham {Father of a multitude, chief
of multitude}]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60 - Peleg {Division}]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10 - Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5 - Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [(c) 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
NOTE: That within the year 2019, the full moon will come on 21 March
(after the spring equinox). Yet, the ecclesiastical Easter will fall on
21 April 2019 by which concludes the cycle as a process of #236 -
PAIRING relativity intentioned upon implementation of a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which given the absence of any viable
*reverse*-*transcriptase* *inhibitor* natural process (as discussed
below with the #288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE {*REGENERATION*}:
@1 = @728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD},
@5 = PENTECOST {#FIVE: + 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY WHICH *CONFLICTS*
*WITH* *ARCHBISHOP* *GEORGE* *PELL'S* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* AT
SAINT PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CATHEDRAL, MELBOURNE UPON PENTECOST SUNDAY /
BEERSHEBA MEMORIAL DAY OF 31 MAY 1998 AND PENTECOST {#382 - *THE*
*SCIENCE* *INTO* *A* *PERMANENT* *STATE*; #383; #384; #385; #386} OF
SUNDAY 11 JUNE 2000 (SOLAR ECLIPSE YEAR FOLLOWING: 21 JUNE Prototype:
*HOMOIOS* {#382 / #385} / HETEROS {#384 / #386} / TORAH {#378 / #383}):
#337 as [#30, #50, #7, #200, #10, #40] = naziyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #7 as
#267 % #41 = #21} 1) consecrated or devoted one, Nazarite; 1a)
*CONSECRATED* *ONE*; 1b) *DEVOTEE*, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#474 as [#100, #4, #10, #300, #10, #50] = qaddiysh (Aramaic) (H6922):
{UMBRA: #6 as #414 % #41 = #4} 1) *HOLY*, *SEPARATE*; 2) (TWOT)
*ANGELS*, *SAINTS*;
},
#65 = *SOLDIER*,
#175 = *MARRIAGE*
THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY
EXPLANTATION AND SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY TO JEWISH
/ CHRISTIAN APOSTLES AS A SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION OF NAZARENES / #509 -
YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY [Acts 24:1-6; Acts 28:17-22] WHICH WAS
INITIALLY CONVEYED WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18
NOVEMBER 2018.
“THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} ENTERED INTO THE JUDGMENT HALL AGAIN,
AND CALLED JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH
{SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART; SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED},
AND SAID UNTO HIM, ART THOU THE #410 - *KING* OF THE JEWS?
H3468@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 16 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 57 (#97),
@4: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 70 (#167),
Male: #91; Feme: #167
} // #410
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166
#410 as [#30, #10, #300, #70] = yesha` (H3468): {UMBRA: #9 as #380 % #41
= #11} 1) *DELIVERANCE*, *SALVATION*, *RESCUE*, *SAFETY*, *WELFARE*; 1a)
safety, welfare, prosperity; 1b) salvation; 1c) victory;
JESUS ANSWERED HIM, SAYEST THOU THIS THING OF THYSELF, OR DID OTHERS
TELL IT THEE OF ME?
PILATE ANSWERED, AM I A JEW? THINE OWN NATION AND THE CHIEF PRIESTS HAVE
DELIVERED {ie. #325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1,
#100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100,
#1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as
#582 % #41 = #8}} THEE UNTO ME: WHAT HAST THOU DONE?
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN (3.8.3.19.0)@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 61 (#95); Ego: 27 (#61),
@3: Sup: 80 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 19 (#80),
@4: Sup: 48 (#223); Ego: 49 (#129),
@5: Sup: 2 (#225); Ego: 35 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@6: Sup: 81 (#306); Ego: 79 (#243),
@7: Sup: 1 (#307); Ego: 1 (#244),
@8: Sup: 34 (#341 - SEE BELOW KANT'S IDEA: *ONE* *CAN* *TINKER*
*AROUND* *WITH* #41 {#329} - *METAPHYSICS* *IN* *SUNDRY* *WAYS*
*WITHOUT* *EVEN* *SUSPECTING* *THAT* *ONE* *MIGHT* *BE* *VENTURING*
*INTO* *UNTRUTH* / *WHETHER* *THE* *WORLD* *HAS* *EXISTED* *FROM*
*ETERNITY*, *OR* *HAS* *A* *BEGINNING*?); Ego: 33 (#277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
A TEST),
@9: Sup: 79 (#420 - *VAULT* *OF* *THE* *HEAVENS*, *FIRMAMENT* *AS*
*BINDING* *EARTH* *TO* *THE* *HEAVENS*); Ego: 45 (#322),
Male: #420; Feme: #322
}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #52 AS IDEA @341: "*ONE*
*CAN* *TINKER* *AROUND* *WITH* #41 {#329} - *METAPHYSICS* *IN* *SUNDRY*
*WAYS* *WITHOUT* *EVEN* *SUSPECTING* *THAT* *ONE* *MIGHT* *BE*
*VENTURING* *INTO* *UNTRUTH*. For if only we do not contradict ourselves
– something that is indeed entirely possible with synthetic, though
completely fanciful, propositions – then we can never be refuted by
experience in all such cases where the concepts we connect are mere
ideas, which can by no means be given (in their entire content) in
experience. For how would we decide through experience: *WHETHER* *THE*
*WORLD* *HAS* *EXISTED* *FROM* *ETERNITY*, *OR* *HAS* *A* *BEGINNING*?
Whether matter is infinitely divisible, or is constituted out of simple
parts? Concepts such as these cannot be given in any experience (even
the greatest possible), and so the falsity of the affirmative or
negative thesis cannot be discovered through that touchstone.
*THE* *SINGLE* *POSSIBLE* *CASE* *IN* *WHICH* *REASON* *WOULD* *REVEAL*
(*AGAINST* *ITS* *WILL*) *ITS* *SECRET* *DIALECTIC* (*WHICH* *IT*
*FALSELY* *PASSES* *OFF* *AS* *DOGMATICS*:
H4378@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 60 (#100); Ego: 20 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#117); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#144); Ego: 10 (#108),
@5: Sup: 47 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 20 (#128),
@6: Sup: 6 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#168
- I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #197; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #260 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140
#330 as [#40, #20, #200, #10, #20, #40] = makkar (H4378): {UMBRA: #6 as
#260 % #41 = #14} 1) acquaintance, *FRIEND*;
"THE JEWS CRIED OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT
CAESAR’S #330 - *FRIEND*: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A #410 - *KING*
SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12 (KJV)]
) *WOULD* *BE* *THAT* *IN* *WHICH* *IT* *BASED* *AN* *ASSERTION* *ON*
*A* *UNIVERSALLY* *ACKNOWLEDGED* *PRINCIPLE*, *AND*, *WITH* *THE*
*GREATEST* *PROPRIETY* *IN* *THE* *MODE* *OF* *INFERENCE*, *DERIVED*
*THE* *DIRECT* *OPPOSITE* *FROM* *ANOTHER* *EQUALLY* *ACCREDITED*
*PRINCIPLE*. Now this case is here actual, and indeed is so with respect
to *FOUR* *NATURAL* *IDEAS* *OF* *REASON*, from which there arise – each
with proper consistency and from universally acknowledged principles –
four assertions on one side and just as many counter assertions on the
other, thereby revealing the dialectical illusion of pure reason in the
use of these principles, which otherwise would have had to remain
forever hidden.
H7256@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 40 (#78); Ego: 2 (#40),
@3: Sup: 29 (#107); Ego: 70 (#110),
@4: Sup: 39 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 10 (#120),
@5: Sup: 79 (#225); Ego: 40 (#160),
Male: #225; Feme: #160
} // #322
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; *I* *AM* *NOT* *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *WEEPING* *TO* *ANY*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#322 as [#200, #2, #70, #10, #40] = ribbea` (H7256): {UMBRA: #6 as #272
% #41 = #26} 1) pertaining to the *FOURTH*;
"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD
thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children unto the third and *FOURTH* {#322 as [#200, #2, #70, #10, #40]
= ribbea` (H7256): fourth} generation of them that hate me;" [Exodus
20:5 (KJV)]
Here is, therefore, a decisive test, which must necessarily disclose to
us [IDEA: @341] a fault that lies hidden in the presuppositions of reason:
NOTE: I therefore desire that the critical reader concern himself
mainly with this antinomy {ie. a #312 - *CONTRADICTION* between two
beliefs or conclusions that are in themselves reasonable; a paradox},
because *NATURE* *ITSELF* *SEEMS* *TO* *HAVE* *SET* *IT* *UP* *TO*
*MAKE* *REASON* *SUSPICIOUS* *IN* *ITS* *BOLD* *CLAIMS* *AND* *TO*
*FORCE* *A* *SELF*-*EXAMINATION*. I promise to answer for each proof I
have given of both thesis and antithesis, and thereby to establish the
certainty of the inevitable antinomy of reason. If the reader is
induced, through this strange phenomenon, to reexamine the
presupposition that underlies it, he will then feel constrained to
investigate more deeply with me the *PRIMARY* *FOUNDATION* *OF* *ALL*
*COGNITION* *THROUGH* *PURE* *REASON*.
Of two mutually contradictory propositions both cannot be false save
when the concept underlying them both is itself contradictory; e.g., the
two propositions: a square circle is round, and: a square circle is not
round, are both false. For, as regards the first, it is false that the
aforementioned circle is round, since it is square; but it is also false
that it is not round, i.e., has corners, since it is a circle. The
logical mark of the impossibility of a concept consists, then, in this:
that under the presupposition of this concept, two contradictory
propositions would be false simultaneously; and since between these two
no third proposition can be thought, through this concept nothing at all
is thought." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @341, pages 92-93]
Nous: #36
Time: 06:45 hrs
Date: 2019.7.3
Torah:
Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering
#260 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - *FRIEND* / *REBELLIOUS* / #410 - *YESHUA* /
*KING*} / HETEROS {#352 - *A* *PROVING* *TRIAL* / *MARY* / #421 -
*EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*} / TORAH {#373 - *FROM* *TRUTH* *INTO* *ERROR* /
#472 - *CURSE*}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:7,nous:36&idea:{m,330}&idea:{f,410}&idea:{m,352}&idea:{f,421}&idea:{m,373}&idea:{f,472}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 7, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.7.3, Time: 06:45
hrs, Super: #330 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #410 / #36 -
Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]
JESUS ANSWERED, *MY* *KINGDOM* *IS* *NOT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*: *IF* *MY*
*KINGDOM* *WERE* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*, *THEN* *WOULD* *MY* *SERVANTS*
*FIGHT*,
HALLELUJAH (2.3.7.36.0)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 36 (#117); Ego: 36 (#117),
@3: Sup: 22 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 67 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 8 (#147); Ego: 67 (#251),
@5: Sup: 24 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 16
(#267),
@6: Sup: 55 (#226); Ego: 31 (#298),
@7: Sup: 41 (#267); Ego: 67 (#365),
@8: Sup: 58 (#325 - THAT I SHOULD NOT BE #330 - *DELIVERED* {#325 /
#260} TO THE JEWS: BUT NOW IS MY #410 - *KINGDOM* NOT FROM HENCE); Ego:
17 (#382),
@9: Sup: 5 (#330); Ego: 28 (#410),
Male: #330; Feme: #410
}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #43 AS IDEA @330: "In the
Critique I always gave my greatest attention not only to how I could
distinguish carefully the types of cognition, but also to how I could
derive all the concepts belonging to each type from their common source,
so that I might not only, by learning their origin, be able to determine
their use with certainty, but also might have the inestimable advantage
(never yet imagined) of cognizing a priori, hence according to
principles, the completeness of the enumeration, classification, and
specification of the [IDEA: @330] concepts.
YOUTUBE: "Hallelujah (Pentatonix)"
Failing this, everything in metaphysics is nothing but rhapsody, in
which one never knows whether what one has is enough, or whether and
where something may still be lacking. Such an advantage is, of course,
available only in pure philosophy, but it constitutes the essence of
that philosophy.
Since I had found the origin of the categories in the four logical
functions of all judgments of the understanding, it was completely
natural to look for the origin of the ideas in the three functions of
syllogisms (i.e., inferences of reason); for once such pure concepts of
reason (transcendental ideas) have been granted, then, if they are not
to be taken for innate, they could indeed be found nowhere else except
in this very act of reason, which, insofar as it relates merely to form,
constitutes the logical in syllogisms, but, insofar as it represents the
judgments of the understanding as determined with respect to one or
another a priori form, constitutes the transcendental concepts of pure
reason.
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762;
A RESTATEMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES PREMISE:
G2470@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 37 (#95); Ego: 70 (#118),
@4: Sup: 6 (#101); Ego: 50 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #101; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #480 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#330 as [#10, #200, #70, #50] = isos (G2470): {UMBRA: #24 as #480 % #41
= #29} 1) *EQUAL*, *IN* *QUANTITY* *OR* *QUALITY*;
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
The formal distinction of syllogisms necessitates their division into
categorical, hypothetical, and disjunctive. Therefore the concepts of
reason based thereupon contain first, the idea of the complete subject
(the sub-stantial), second, the idea of the complete series of
conditions, and third, the determination of all concepts in the idea of
a complete sum total of the possible.∗ *THE* *FIRST* *IDEA* *WAS*
*PSYCHOLOGICAL*, *THE* *SECOND* *COSMOLOGICAL*, *THE* *THIRD*
*THEOLOGICAL*; *AND* *SINCE* *ALL* *THREE* *GIVE* *RISE* *TO* *A*
*DIALECTIC*, but each in its own way, all this provided the basis for
dividing the entire dialectic of pure reason into the paralogism, the
antinomy, and finally the ideal of pure reason – through which
derivation it is rendered completely certain that all claims of pure
reason are represented here in full, and not one can be missing, since
the faculty of reason itself, whence they all originate, is thereby
fully surveyed." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @330, pages 82-83]
THAT I SHOULD NOT BE #330 - *DELIVERED* {#325 / #260} TO THE JEWS: BUT
NOW IS MY #410 - *KINGDOM* NOT FROM HENCE.
H4560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 49 (#149); Ego: 60 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#155); Ego: 38 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #155; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#330 as [#30, #40, #60, #200] = macar (H4560): {UMBRA: #7 as #300 % #41
= #13} 1) *TO* *SET* *APART*, *DELIVER* *UP*, *OFFER*; 1a) (Qal) to set
apart; 1b) (Niphal) to be delivered over, be assigned to, be set apart;
H4428@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 16 (#73); Ego: 40 (#97),
@3: Sup: 46 (#119); Ego: 30 (#127),
@4: Sup: 66 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 20
(#147),
@5: Sup: 5 (#190); Ego: 20 (#167),
Male: #190; Feme: #167
} // #410
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#410 as [#300, #40, #30, #20, #20] = melek (H4428): {UMBRA: #10 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) *KING*;
PILATE THEREFORE SAID UNTO HIM, ART THOU A #410 - *KING* THEN? JESUS
ANSWERED, THOU SAYEST THAT I AM A #410 - *KING*. TO THIS END WAS I BORN,
AND FOR THIS CAUSE CAME I INTO THE WORLD, THAT I SHOULD BEAR WITNESS
UNTO THE TRUTH. EVERY ONE THAT IS OF THE TRUTH HEARETH MY VOICE .
SEE ALSO: "*VOX* *POPULI* *VOX* *DEI*"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Vox%20Populi%20Vox%20Dei.pdf>
PILATE SAITH UNTO HIM, WHAT IS TRUTH? AND WHEN HE HAD SAID THIS, HE WENT
OUT AGAIN UNTO THE JEWS, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, I FIND IN HIM NO #330 -
*FAULT* AT ALL.
H2642@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 14 (#20); Ego: 8 (#14),
@3: Sup: 74 (#94); Ego: 60 (#74),
@4: Sup: 31 (#125); Ego: 38 (#112),
@5: Sup: 37 (#162); Ego: 6 (#118),
@6: Sup: 6 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego:
50 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #168; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #324 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#330 as [#6, #8, #60, #200, #6, #50] = checrown (H2642): {UMBRA: #0 as
#324 % #41 = #37} 1) *THE* *THING* *LACKING*, *DEFECT*, *DEFICIENCY*;
BUT YE HAVE A CUSTOM, THAT I SHOULD RELEASE UNTO YOU ONE AT THE
PASSOVER: WILL YE THEREFORE THAT I RELEASE UNTO YOU THE KING OF THE
JEWS?” [John 18:33-39 (KJV)]
Drawing then upon this temporal notion from 'TIME TO TIME' as #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY which severally appears within QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900:
THE PREAMBLE: "Office of Governor General shall be FROM TIME TO TIME
APPOINTED"
SECTION VIII: "In the event of his death, #273 - *INCAPACITY*, or #473 -
*ABSENCE* {ie.
"AND THEY DREW ALEXANDER {ONE WHO ASSISTS MEN} OUT OF THE MULTITUDE, THE
JEWS PUTTING HIM FORWARD. AND ALEXANDER BECKONED WITH THE HAND, AND
WOULD HAVE MADE HIS DEFENCE UNTO THE PEOPLE {#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70,
#200] = demos (G1218): people}." [Acts 19:33 (KJV)]
From the Greek: dēmos meaning: free citizens, sovereign people; popular
government, democracy; popular assembly as having by implication an
*ISOPSEPHIC* equivalence to the #1340 - COURSE-trochos OF #473 -
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as a circularity
Nous: #19
Time: 18:50 hrs
Date: 2019.1.3
Torah: [#10, #8, #6]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 18 (#28); Ego: 8 (#18),
@3: Sup: 24 (#52); Ego: 6 (#24),
Male: #52; Feme: #24
} // #24
Dao: Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity
Tetra: #58 - Gathering In
I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations
Latin: Recordabilis {God who knows all things} Alt: Haziel {Seeing of God} {
1. PROTECTOR OF PRINCES, SERVES TO UNCOVER PLOTS & TRAITORS
2. IN UNDOING THEIR PLANS
3. JUST RULERS
4. Ouestucati
}
David {Well-beloved, dear}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - *VAULT* *OF* *THE* *HEAVENS*, *FIRMAMENT*
*AS* *BINDING* *EARTH* *TO* *THE* *HEAVENS* / #322 - *FREE* *CITIZENS*,
*SOVEREIGN* *PEOPLE*; *POPULAR* *GOVERNMENT*, *DEMOCRACY*; *POPULAR*
*ASSEMBLY*} / HETEROS {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} /
TORAH {#369 - DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:8,col:3,nous:19&idea:{m,420}&idea:{f,322}&idea:{m,404}&idea:{f,314}&idea:{m,369}&idea:{f,337}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 19 [Date: 2019.1.3, Time: 18:50
hrs, Super: #420 / #80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in
Isolation; I-Ching: H16 - Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For,
Excess; Tetra: 23 - Ease, Ego: #322 / #19 - Argument for Ethical
Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle
Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #44 AS IDEA @322: "If one
considers the properties of the circle by which this figure unifies in a
universal rule at once so many arbitrary determinations of the space
within it, one cannot refrain from ascribing a nature to this
geometrical thing. Thus, in particular, two lines that intersect each
other and also the circle, however they happen to be drawn, nonetheless
always partition each other in a regular manner such that the rectangle
from the parts of one line is equal to that from the other. Now I ask:
“Does this law lie in the circle, or does it lie in the understanding?”
i.e., does this figure, independent of the understanding, contain the
basis for this law in itself, or does the understanding, since it has
itself constructed the figure in accordance with its concepts (namely,
the equality of the radii), at the same time insert into it the law that
chords cut one another in geometrical proportion?
If [IDEA: @321] one traces the proofs of this law, one soon sees that it
can be derived only from the condition on which the understanding based
the construction of this figure, namely, the equality of the radii. If
we now expand upon this concept so as to follow up still further the
unity of the manifold properties of geometrical figures under common
laws, and we consider the circle as a conic section, which is therefore
subject to the very same fundamental conditions of construction as other
conic sections, we then find that all chords that intersect within these
latter (within the ellipse, the parabola, and the hyperbola) always do
so in such a way that the rectangles from their parts are not indeed
equal, but always stand to one another in equal proportions. If from
there we go still further, namely to the *FUNDAMENTAL* *DOCTRINES* *OF*
*PHYSICAL* *ASTRONOMY*, there appears a physical law of reciprocal
attraction, extending to all material nature, the rule of which is that
these attractions decrease inversely with the square of the distance
from each point of attraction, exactly as the spherical surfaces into
which this force spreads itself increase, something that seems to reside
as necessary in the nature of the things themselves and which therefore
is customarily presented as cognizable a priori.
<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion on 3 JULY {#330 / #410} and 147,000,000+
kilometers for perihelion on 3 JANUARY {#420 / #322}: Gothika (vector
image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY SA 3.0, via
Wikimedia Commons @ <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]
The elliptical shape of Earth's orbit causes the variation in the length
of the seasons – and brings us closest to the sun in January. Bottom
line: In 2019, Earth's closest point to the sun – called its perihelion
– comes on January 3 at 05:20 Universal Time (on January 2 at 11:20 p.m.
CST). For an object moving in an elliptical orbit about another
celestial body, the point of closest approach is called the periapsis
(from the Greek peri = near). At this point in the orbit, the object is
travelling at its greatest speed (Kepler’s Second Law).
As simple as are the sources of this law – in that they rest merely on
the relation of spherical surfaces with different radii – the
consequence therefrom is nonetheless so excellent with respect to the
variety and regularity of its agreement that not only does it follow
that all possible orbits of the celestial bodies are conic sections, but
also that their mutual relations are such that no other law of
attraction save that of the inverse square of the distances can be
*CONCEIVED* *AS* *SUITABLE* *FOR* *A* *SYSTEM* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*.
G1218@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 12 (#16); Ego: 8 (#12),
@3: Sup: 52 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 40 (#52),
@4: Sup: 41 (#109); Ego: 70 (#122),
@5: Sup: 79 (#188); Ego: 38 (#160),
Male: #188; Feme: #160
} // #322
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #322 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70, #200] = demos (G1218): {UMBRA: #11 as #322 %
#41 = #35} 1) *THE* *PEOPLE*, the mass of people assembled in a public
place;
Here then is nature that rests on laws that the understanding cognizes a
priori, and indeed chiefly from universal principles of the
determination of space. Now I ask: do these laws of nature lie in space,
and does the understanding learn them in that it merely seeks to
investigate the wealth of meaning that lies in space, or do they lie in
the understanding and in the way in which it determines space in
accordance with the conditions of the synthetic unity toward which its
concepts are one and all directed? *SPACE* *IS* *SOMETHING* *SO*
*UNIFORM*, *AND* *SO* *INDETERMINATE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *ALL*
*SPECIFIC* *PROPERTIES*, *THAT* *CERTAINLY* *NO* *ONE* *WILL* *LOOK*
*FOR* *A* *STOCK* *OF* *NATURAL* *LAWS* *WITHIN* *IT*. By contrast, that
which determines space into the figure of a circle, a cone, or a sphere
is the understanding, insofar as it contains the basis [IDEA: @322] for
the unity of the construction of these figures. The bare universal form
of intuition called space is therefore certainly the substratum of all
intuitions determinable upon particular objects, and, admittedly, the
condition for the possibility and variety of those intuitions lies in
this space; but the unity of the objects is determined solely through
the understanding, and indeed according to conditions that reside in its
own nature; and so the understanding is the origin of the universal
order of nature, in that it comprehends all appearances under its own
laws and thereby first brings about experience a priori (with respect to
its form), in virtue of which everything that is to be cognized only
through experience is necessarily subject to its laws. For we are not
concerned with the nature of the things in themselves, which is
independent of the conditions of both our senses and understanding, but
with nature as an object of possible experience, and here the
understanding, since it makes experience possible, at the same time
makes it that the sensible world is either not an object of experience
at all, or else is nature." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @322,
pages 73-74]
YOUTUBE: "*HOLY* *HOLY* *HOLY* *GOD* *ALMIGHTY*(Agnus Dei)
"AND THE PEOPLE {#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70, #200] = demos (G1218):
people} GAVE A SHOUT, SAYING, IT IS THE VOICE OF A GOD, AND NOT OF A
MAN." [Acts 12:22 (KJV)]
}, to such person or persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our
said Commonwealth."
{
"derivation" : "from G575 (ἀπόδημος) and G1218 (ἀπόδημος);",
"kjv_def" : "taking a far journey",
"lemma" : "ἀπόδημος",
"frequency" : 1,
"strongs_def" : " absent from one's own people, i.e. a foreign traveller",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "away from one's people, go abroad"
},
"strongs" : "G590",
"xlit" : "apódēmos",
"umbra" : {
"473" : [1, 80, 70, 4, 8, 40, 70, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"473" : [1, 80, 70, 4, 8, 40, 70, 200]
}
}
SECTION IX: "FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE,
ALTER, OR AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET"
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE* / PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE {#205} - DISCRIMINATING NORM {#369} / PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
{#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS / PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 X 7 = #2184}]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
— FORTUNE COOKIE ANYONE? —
[Posted @ 0447 hours on 20 February 2019]
"CONTRADICTION CONTRADICTION.
THAT'S ALL WHICH I HEAR. {@3: Sup: 15 (#121); Ego: 77 (#130 - I AM NOT
EVIL MINDED {%3})},
SUCH OPINION OF MALEDICTION. {@4: Sup: 49 (#170); Ego: 62 (#192 - I AM
NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39})},
IT'S REALLY WITHOUT PEER. {@5: Sup: 27 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY
SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 20 (#212)},
BUT YOUR MIND IS SO SMALL.
LITTLE WONDER OF TRUTH TELL.
CHINESE MARXISM AND IT'S #410 - PALL.
CERTAINLY KNOWS DEATH'S #410 - KNELL." {@9: Sup: 61 (#331: SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA); Ego: 3 (#313)},
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #44 AS IDEA @331: "[IDEA:
@331] In this examination it is in general further noteworthy: *THAT*
*THE* *IDEAS* *OF* *REASON* *ARE* *NOT*, *LIKE* *THE* *CATEGORIES*,
*HELPFUL* *TO* *US* *IN* *SOME* *WAY* *IN* *USING* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*
*WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *EXPERIENCE*, *BUT* *ARE* *COMPLETELY*
*DISPENSABLE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *SUCH* *USE*, *NAY*, *ARE*
*CONTRARY* *TO* *AND* *OBSTRUCTIVE* *OF* *THE* *MAXIMS* *FOR* *THE*
*COGNITION* *OF* *NATURE* *THROUGH* *REASON*, although they are still
quite necessary in another respect, yet to be determined. In explaining
the appearances of the soul, we can be completely indifferent to whether
it is a simple substance or not; for we are unable through any possible
experience to make the concept of a simple being sensorily intelligible,
hence intelligible *IN* *CONCRETO*; and this concept is therefore
completely empty with respect to all hoped-for insight into the cause of
the appearances, and cannot serve as a principle of explanation of that
which supplies inner or outer experience. JUST AS LITTLE CAN THE
COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD OR THE ETERNITY OF THE
WORLD {ie.
*A* *PARTE* *ANTE* is a term and its converse *A* *PARTE* *POST* that
are used to denote respectively the two notions of eternity in the past
and eternity in the future. These notions involve a #312 -
*CONTRADICTION*, inasmuch as the thought of eternity involves the
illimitable, and the present constitutes a limit both to the past and
the future. For the former, if we mean by the past eternity, infinite
time, we make it impossible that the present or any given moment should
ever be arrived at. For the latter, as we must start from the present,
we must substitute for the idea of eternity that of an endless future.
This #312 - *CONTRADICTION* results from giving eternity the definition
of infinite time, whereas it means independence of time, a state in
which all is alike present, a state which can never be that of the
creature, who can be endued with immortality, but cannot, like the high
and the lofty *ONE*, inhabit eternity which as the Latin phrase *NUNC*
*FLUENS*, Latin for "flowing now," is the belief in time and the flow of
it through an eternity, never beginning nor stopping. The constant
present of the latter has been entitled the Latin phrase *NUNC* *STANS*
for "abiding now," is the belief that time itself doesn't exist, and
that any distinctions between now, before and the future have either
fallen away or don't exist.
) HELP US TO EXPLAIN ANY EVENT IN THE WORLD ITSELF. FINALLY, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A CORRECT MAXIM OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY, WE MUST REFRAIN
FROM ALL EXPLANATIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF NATURE DRAWN FROM THE WILL
OF A SUPREME BEING, BECAUSE THIS IS NO LONGER NATURAL PHILOSOPHY BUT AN
ADMISSION THAT WE HAVE COME TO THE END OF IT.
These ideas therefore have a completely different determination of their
use from that of the categories, through which (and through the
principles built upon them) experience itself first became possible.
Nevertheless our laborious analytic of the understanding would have been
entirely superfluous, if our aim had been directed toward nothing other
than mere cognition of nature insofar as such cognition can be given in
experience; for reason conducts its affairs in both mathematics and
natural science quite safely and quite well, even without any such
subtle deduction; hence our critique of the understanding joins with the
ideas of pure reason for a purpose that lies beyond the use of the
understanding in experience, though we have said above that the use of
the understanding in this regard is wholly impossible and without object
or significance. There must nonetheless be agreement between what
belongs to the nature of reason and of the understanding, and the former
must contribute to the perfection of the latter and cannot possibly
confuse it.
The solution to this question is as follows: Pure reason does not, among
its ideas, have in view particular objects that might lie beyond the
field [IDEA: @332] of experience, but it merely demands completeness in
the use of the understanding in the connection of experience. This
completeness can, however, only be a completeness of principles, but not
of intuitions and objects. Nonetheless, in order to represent these
principles determinately, reason conceives of them as the cognition of
an object, cognition of which is completely determined with respect to
these rules – though the object is only an idea – so as to bring
cognition through the understanding as close as possible to the
completeness that this idea signifies." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY
OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @331,
pages 83-84]
A reasonable question in regard to the logical nature of its *IN*
*CONCRETO* grounding as *ONE* {ie.
THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
} that as argumentation is made of EMANATION theology in relation to the
perspective for instance of ASYLUM INFLUX which may be viewed as an
irrational product of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct to
imperial governance as artifice perspective of the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
dynamic.
Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:
A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.
The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the *POLICE*, *FIRE* *SERVICE*, *LOCAL* *GOVERNMENT* *BODIES*
*OR* *SCHOOLS*. [<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]
That MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of
an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law;
wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public trust
[Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com] by engaging
within allegedly irregular #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a PRIVATE
NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY OF AS
DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY BEING AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
“DIEU ET MON DROIT” was by CARPE DIEM VOCALISED OBJECTION an entirely
propitious characteristic as conformity to #873 - *PROBITY* and within
bounds of decorum as ontological pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY)
values which were compliant with the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET badge purchased the year prior
before Remembrance Day of 11 November 2016 and was not simply an action
of nostalgia by fanciful decoration being only a contrived dignity.
REGARDING ON THE PROVISION OF THE NECESSARY DETAILS BY THEN MAKING AN
APPLICATION UNDER REQUISITE LEGISLATION (perhaps: CHARTER OF HUMAN
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006) FOR THE #390 - CROWN TO MEET ALL
OUR LEGAL COSTS AND BEFORE ANY OTHER MATTERS CAN BE ADDRESSED, DIRECTING
TO THE NOMINATED BARRISTER THE QUESTION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANY
'FOREIGN POWER':
'YOU WILL TO YOUR UTTERMOST BEAR FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE UNTO THE QUEEN'S
MAJESTY {ie. @115 = *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*,
*AUTHORITY*, *POWER*)}; AND WILL ASSIST AND DEFEND ALL JURISDICTIONS,
PRE-EMINENCES, AND AUTHORITIES, GRANTED TO HER MAJESTY, AND ANNEXED TO
THE CROWN BY ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, OR *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL*
*FOREIGN* *PRINCES*, *PERSONS*, *PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR*
*POTENTATES*.' [ref: Queen Victoria's 29 OCTOBER 1900 Letters Patent to
AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL” dated 17 SEPTEMBER
1900 that is conveyed by the OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD / DIEU ET MON DROIT
which dates back to at least 1570]
Ought therefore to be unlawful conduct by any PUBLIC AUTHORITY under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1) Subject to this section, it is
unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible
with a human right or, in making a decision, to fail to give proper
consideration to a relevant human right.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if, as a result of a statutory
provision or a provision made by or under an Act of the Commonwealth or
otherwise under law, the public authority could not reasonably have
acted differently or made a different decision..
(3) This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
(4) Subsection (1) does not require a public authority to act in a way,
or make a decision, that has the effect of impeding or preventing a
religious body (including itself in the case of a public authority that
is a religious body) from acting in conformity with the religious
doctrines, beliefs or principles in accordance with which the religious
body operates.
(5) In this section religious body means—
(a) a body established for a religious purpose; or
(b) an entity that establishes, or directs, controls or administers, an
educational or other charitable entity that is intended to be, and is,
conducted in accordance with religious doctrines, beliefs or principles.
There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as PUBLIC AUTHORITY and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
Governor General as #2184 - ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.
In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a code of conduct and
circularity which as intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY as it’s grounding that as temporality is anchored within
49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J {ie. IPSO
FACTO: 49 as JULIAN YEAR x #2184 = 6J as 294 years x 364 = 107016 days /
293 years = 365.24232 TROPICAL YEAR as @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF*
*TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR*}.
As assistance to the considerations of the COURT we have in compliance
with the provisions of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900, hereby provided a justification for the #322 - *SOVEREIGNTY* *OF*
*THE* *PEOPLE* within their own right as democracy attributed by #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (which is inclusive of the indigenous populace as
aboriginals) by a narrative published within 1783 as OCCURRING 5 YEARS
BEFORE AUSTRALIA WAS INITIALLY LANDED UPON 18 JANUARY 1788 {ie.
BEING CONTRADICTION OF 16 to 20 JANUARY WITHIN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL
SCHEMA: #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 -
REMEMBER THE SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
TOTAL: @45 + @68 = #113 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (#364 - PRINCIPLE OF
ENQUIRY) #113 as [#6, #10, #6, #90, #1] = yatsa' (H3318): {UMBRA: #2 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) to go out, come out, exit, go forth; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to go or come out or forth, depart; 1a2) to go forth (to a place);
1a3) to go forward, proceed to (to or toward something); 1a4) to come or
go forth (with purpose or for result); 1a5) to come out of; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to go or come out, bring out, lead out; 1b2) to
bring out of; 1b3) to lead out; 1b4) to deliver; 1c) (Hophal) to be
brought out or forth;
H3318@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 22 (#44); Ego: 6 (#22),
@4: Sup: 31 (#75); Ego: 9 (#31),
@5: Sup: 32 (#107); Ego: 1 (#32),
Male: #107; Feme: #32
} // #113
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #113 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
"Go {#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} forth {#113
as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} of the ark, thou, and
thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee." [Genesis 8:16 (KJV)]
"Bring {#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} forth
{#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} with thee every
living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of
cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that
they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply
upon the earth." [Genesis 8:17 (KJV)]
} AND THE COLONY PROPER WAS ESTABLISHED BY ADMIRAL ARTHUR PHILLIP (11
October 1738 – 31 August 1814) AS A ROYAL NAVY OFFICER AND THE FIRST
GOVERNOR OF NEW SOUTH WALES UPON 26 JANUARY 1788 (AUSTRALIA DAY) {ie.
BEING CONTRADICTION OF 26 to 30 JANUARY WITHIN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL SCHEMA
*CORNERSTONE*: #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
TOTAL: @130 + @139 + #140 + @146 + @148 + @150 + @156 + @157 + @158 +
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC
PROGRESSION) [#3, #10, #50, #800, #200, #20, #5, #300, #800] / #474 as
[#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as #1883 %
#41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;
4 x #547 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5,
#50, #70, #10] = paralogizomai (G3884): {UMBRA: #28 as #423 % #41 = #13}
1) to reckon wrong, miscount; 2) to cheat by false reckoning; 3) to
deceive, delude, circumvent; 2a) to deceive by false reasoning;
G3884@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 50 (#250); Ego: 30 (#131),
@6: Sup: 39 (#289); Ego: 70 (#201),
@7: Sup: 42 (#331); Ego: 3 (#204),
@8: Sup: 52 (#383); Ego: 10 (#214),
@9: Sup: 59 (#442); Ego: 7 (#221),
@10: Sup: 48 (#490); Ego: 70 (#291),
@11: Sup: 7 (#497); Ego: 40 (#331),
@12: Sup: 12 (#509); Ego: 5 (#336),
@13: Sup: 62 (#571); Ego: 50 (#386),
@14: Sup: 51 (#622); Ego: 70 (#456),
@15: Sup: 61 (#683); Ego: 10 (#466),
Male: #683; Feme: #466
} // #547
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #423 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
"And this I say, lest- any man should beguile {#547 as [#80, #1, #100,
#1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = paralogizomai
(G3884): beguile} you with enticing words." [Colossians 2:4 (KJV)]
"But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving {#547 as
[#80, #1, #100, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10]
= paralogizomai (G3884): beguile} your own selves." [James 1:22 (KJV)]
Having provided an essential blueprint proof of an #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE as the #420 - BINDING THE EARTH TO
THE HEAVENS {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN} DYNAMIC by means of a SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMOUS TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL NOUMENON definition of human sapience
and cognition surely then GROWTH will come to the COMMONWEALTH ECONOMY
from innovation within every faculty of human endeavour and therefore I
must respectfully disagree with this statement: “Even when 5G arrives,
it will be hard to penetrate the smartphone market further. Growth will
come from pricing...” [Al Root, Barrons @ 1243 HOURS ON 23 FEBRUARY 2019]
AL ROOT (DOW JONES) @ 0043 HOURS ON 24 FEBRUARY 2019: “Very interesting.”
DOLF @ 0143 HOURS ON 24 FEBRUARY 2019: “Thank you and here [are] the
object[s] which is the noumenon.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/gizmo.json>
<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/transform-prototypes.json>
With respect to its *CORNERSTONE* contextual history, I refer to
observations of ‘CHURCHES AND FEDERATION’ made by IAN BREWARD from pages
219 to 221 within ‘A HISTORY OF THE CHURCHES IN AUSTRALASIA’ (1991
edition) in relation to individual conscience {ie. #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE
WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)} and the role of religion
in political life associated with the adoption of Section 116 of the
Constitution:
CHURCHES, FEDERATION, REJECTION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC PRECEDENCE ON
SUPERIORITY AND THEIR NON-PARTICIPATION WITHIN THE OFFICIAL COMMONWEALTH
INAUGURATION CEREMONY
“The move to Federation of the Australasian colonies demonstrated the
determination of leaders to reject sectarianism. Some were willing to
create a secular constitution rather than see the possibility of a
persecuting establishment. That led to some vigorous discussion on the
desirability of ‘God’ being mentioned in the proposed constitution.
Some opponents were strong Christians, who saw no need for any formal
relation between religion and politics. Indeed, they argued, with a
considerable amount of historical justification, that the freedom of
churches to carry out their mission came from God, and did not need any
constitutional foundation, apart from the liberty of individual
conscience, and the prohibition of any religious tests for the holding
of public office. Seventh-day Adventists, with American precedents in
mind, were determined that they should not be the victims of Protestant
Sabbatarians who denied them the right to work on Sunday. Some Jews
felt equally strongly, even though the number of Orthodox Jews was not
great.
OTHER PROTESTANT GROUPS, LIKE THE NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES,
WERE NOT ONLY PRESSING FOR THE RECOGNITION OF GOD, BUT ALSO FOR
PARLIAMENT TO BE OPENED WITH PRAYER {
"derivation" : "from G2172 (εὐχή);",
"kjv_def" : "prayer, vow",
"lemma" : "εὐχή",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " properly, a wish, expressed as a petition to God, or
in votive obligation",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a prayer to God",
"@2" : "a vow"
},
"strongs" : "G2171",
"xlit" : "euchḗ",
"umbra" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8],
"1063" : [5, 400, 600, 8, 50]
}
}, AND THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL TO HAVE THE POWER TO CALL DAYS OF NATIONAL
*THANKSGIVING* {
"derivation" : "from G2170 (εὐχαριστία);",
"kjv_def" : "thankfulness, (giving of) thanks(-giving)",
"lemma" : "εὐχαριστία",
"frequency" : 13,
"strongs_def" : " gratitude; actively, grateful language (to God, as an
act of worship)",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "thankfulness",
"@2" : "the giving of thanks"
},
"strongs" : "G2169",
"xlit" : "eucharistía",
"umbra" : {
"1627" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"1626" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 9, 1],
"1627" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1],
"1637" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 10],
"1677" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 50],
"1827" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 200],
"2476" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 800, 50]
}
} *AND* *HUMILIATION*." THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS MANAGED A VERY
EFFECTIVE COUNTER CAMPAIGN. THEY WERE PAINFULLY AWARE THAT WILLIAM AND
HENRY FIRTH HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO THE STOCKS IN PARRAMATTA ON 22 APRIL
1894.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#348 / #213} / HETEROS {#296 / #187} / TORAH {#328
/ #203}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&idea:{m,28}&idea:{f,22}&idea:{m,348}&idea:{f,213}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 1, col: 9, nous: 16 [Date: 2018.4.22, Time: 02:05
hrs, Super: #348 / #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship, Ego: #213 / #16 - Being a Guide,
Returning to the Root; I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great
Exceeding, Preponderance of the great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure]
THEY HAD BEEN PROSECUTED BY THE NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES FOR
WORKING ON SUNDAY.
In addition to their in-house paper, the Bible Echo, they also published
the quarterly Sentinel, and Herald of Liberty, modelled on a similar
journal in the USA. It reached a circulation figure of 4,000 and its
emphases were welcomed by some of the major dailies.
The small Seventh-day Adventist church was able exercise such leverage
because it reaffirmed principles which had already been used by
Baptists, Congregationalists, and some Presbyterians to defeat a dual
system of education. It distributed tracts door-to-door in tens of
thousands and, as a result, won over 22,000 signatures to their petition
against any religious clause or declaration of belief in the
Constitution. Even the Bulletin approved of their common sense, but the
recognition petition still managed to gain more than twice the number of
signatures, as well as some weighty political supporters.
THE FIRST REFERENDUM ON FEDERATION FAILED ON 3 JUNE 1898.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#452 / #404} / HETEROS {#444 / #400} / TORAH {#444
/ #400}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:9,nous:46&idea:{m,86}&idea:{f,133}&idea:{m,452}&idea:{f,404}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 9, nous: 46 [Date: 2018.6.3, Time: 04:50
hrs, Super: #452 / #52 - So What?, Returning to the Origin; I-Ching: H45
- Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together (massing),
Finished; Tetra: 61 - Embellishment, Ego: #404 / #46 - Guiding
Contentment, Moderation of Desire; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 37 - Purity]
CARDINAL MORAN, WHO HAD UNSUCCESSFULLY STOOD FOR THE CONVENTION IN 1896,
CAREFULLY INTERVENED IN THE LATE STAGES OF THE CAMPAIGN PRIOR TO THE
SECOND REFERENDUM, WITH THE RESULT THAT MANY PRIESTS URGED THEIR
PARISHIONERS TO VOTE FOR THE BILL.
In Brisbane, the Revd William Higlett, a Baptist minister, argued that
federation would enhance Australia’s ability to fulfil it missionary
responsibility to the Pacific Islands. The pro vote increased by
36,000, giving the bill a comfortable majority over the almost 83,000
who voted against it.
SIR GEORGE REID, A PREMIER OF NEW SOUTH WALES, HAD ALSO CHANGED SIDES,
AND SOME MODEST CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE BILL, BUT THE CHURCHES WERE
CLEARLY INFLUENTIAL. BOTH MORAN AND THE ANGLICAN ARCHBISHOP, SAUMAREZ
SMITH, WERE IN FAVOUR {
"derivation" : "from G2095 (εὔχρηστος) and G5543 (εὔχρηστος);",
"kjv_def" : "profitable, meet for use",
"lemma" : "εὔχρηστος",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " easily used, i.e. useful",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "easy to make use of, useful"
},
"strongs" : "G2173",
"xlit" : "eúchrēstos",
"umbra" : {
"1883" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 200]
}, "gematria" : {
"1733" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 50],
"1883" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 200]
}
} OF SECTION 116 OF THE CONSTITUTION, WHICH PREVENTED SABBATARIAN
LEGISLATION, AND ENSURED THAT THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL COULD NOT PROCLAIM
DAYS OF HUMILIATION AND *THANKSGIVING*. THE ISSUE OF PRAYERS {
"derivation" : "from G2172 (εὐχή);",
"kjv_def" : "prayer, vow",
"lemma" : "εὐχή",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " properly, a wish, expressed as a petition to God, or
in votive obligation",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a prayer to God",
"@2" : "a vow"
},
"strongs" : "G2171",
"xlit" : "euchḗ",
"umbra" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8],
"1063" : [5, 400, 600, 8, 50]
}
} IN PARLIAMENT, AND QUESTIONS OF ECCLESIASTICAL PRECEDENCE {
"derivation" : "from G756 (ἀρχή);",
"kjv_def" : "beginning, *CORNER*, (at the, the) first (estate),
magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule",
"lemma" : "ἀρχή",
"frequency" : 57,
"strongs_def" : " (properly abstract) a commencement, or (*CONCRETELY*)
chief (in various applications of order, time, place, or rank)",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "beginning, origin",
"@2" : "the person or thing that commences, the first person or thing
in a series, the leader",
"@3" : "that by which anything begins to be, the origin, the active
cause",
"@4" : "the extremity of a thing",
"@4a" : "of the corners of a sail",
"@5" : "the first place, principality, rule, magistracy",
"@5a" : "of angels and demons"
},
"strongs" : "G746",
"xlit" : "archḗ",
"umbra" : {
"709" : [1, 100, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"709" : [1, 100, 600, 8],
"712" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 10],
"719" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 10],
"759" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 50],
"902" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 200],
"909" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 200],
"912" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 10, 200]
}
},
{
"derivation" : "from G1832 (ἐξουσία) (in the sense of ability);",
"kjv_def" : "authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength",
"lemma" : "ἐξουσία",
"frequency" : 110,
"strongs_def" : " privilege, i.e. (subjectively) force, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) mastery (concretely, magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, token of control), delegated influence",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases",
"@1a" : "leave or permission",
"@2" : "physical and mental power",
"@2a" : "the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he
either possesses or exercises",
"@3" : "the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)",
"@4" : "the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will
and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)",
"@4a" : "universally",
"@4a1" : "authority over mankind",
"@4b" : "specifically",
"@4b1" : "the power of judicial decisions",
"@4b2" : "of authority to manage domestic affairs",
"@4c" : "metonymically",
"@4c1" : "a thing subject to authority or rule",
"@4c1i" : "jurisdiction",
"@4c2" : "one who possesses authority",
"@4c2i" : "a ruler, a human magistrate",
"@4c2ii" : "the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates",
"@4c3" : "a sign of the husband's authority over his wife",
"@4c3i" : "the veil with which propriety required a women to cover
herself",
"@4c4" : "the sign of regal authority, a crown"
},
"strongs" : "G1849",
"xlit" : "exousía",
"umbra" : {
"746" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"745" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 9, 1],
"746" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1],
"756" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 10],
"796" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 50],
"946" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 200],
"956" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 10, 200],
"1595" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 800, 50]
}
}, CAUSED SOME DISCUSSION, BUT THE LATTER WAS A PREROGATIVE MATTER.
NEVERTHELESS, IT CAUSED CONSIDERABLE TENSION, BECAUSE OF THE SYMBOLIC
IMPORTANCE OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED.
*MORAN* *REFUSED* *TO* *SHARE* *IN* *THE* *OFFICIAL* *INAUGURATION*
*CEREMONY* *WHEN* *HIS* *CLAIM* *TO* *PRECEDENCE* *ON* *SENIORITY* *WAS*
*REJECTED*. SMITH READ THE PRAYER ON 1 JANUARY.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#329 / #329} / HETEROS {#354 / #382} / TORAH {#354
/ #382}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:8,col:3,nous:48&idea:{m,48}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,329}&idea:{f,329}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.1.1, Time: 18:40
hrs, Super: #329 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering,
Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance]
PRESBYTERIANS ALSO HAD SOME CLAIM TO PRECEDENCE BECAUSE OF LINKS WITH
THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND, BUT FAILING THAT THEY ARGUED FOR EQUALITY. AT
THE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT, LORD HOPETOUN READ A PRAYER, WHICH CREATED AN
IMPORTANT PRECEDENT. W. Knox and J.T. Walker moved, in each house, that
prayer begin each session.
They had support from all major church leaders in Victoria, and though
some argued that this would break Section 116 of the Commonwealth’s
Constitution, the majority agreed that a standing order was not a law.
But the prayer was theist rather than Christian, showing, yet again,
that lay Christianity was non-sectarian and not interested in issues of
dogma. The prayer was read by the Speaker. There has never been a
chaplain to either house, unlike the practice in the US Congress. Only
a New Zealand delegate asked about the constitutional position of the
Aborigines, who were completely ignored in the final drafts.”
A PUBLIC RELEASE (CENSORED) VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE HERE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%203%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
TO BE CONTINUED ...
Initial Post: 10 December 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 24 February, 2019
We begin PART 3 of this FILING SUBMISSION by making a further
explanation to what has been stated previously within PARTS 1 and 2 of
this document, that in whatever circumstance such as the instance
conveyed below of IDEA @311 constituting a SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN IMPETUS OF 3 APRIL 33 AD MADE AGAINST THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED WITHIN 1783 AND DUE TO HIS FORMER RELIGIOUS
EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE SPECTRUM AS
HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING WHICH ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS
COMPRISING THE INTELLECTUAL TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
+ #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL
APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER* ITSELF:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
As to being a duplicitous redefinition and thereby a logical fallacy,
which is nevertheless capable of being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for delivery and staging that is
accorded entirely by my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as being sapient
encapsulation provisioned by the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE utilising a DATA SET
comprising #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 = #364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as
being only a SUB-SET of the available LEXICON gnosis constituting some
14,298 RECORDS.
We have now met that requirement for the development of some additional
program functions against the originating DATA SET. Before then
commencing (ie. as concluded with the publishing data of 38Mb upon 20
February 2019} the actual process of regenerating into aggregated
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING our wholsitic 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE
OBJECTS comprising the individual LEXICON JSON resource files and making
them available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>
Noting that the GEMATRIA {ie. as having the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3373
v's #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY} / UMBRA {ie. as having the
*ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3260} and not #800 as false presupposition being
the threshold having equivalence to the *ORDINAL* value of 26th letter
to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages, suggesting that there is a
probable CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus made against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS by the SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30
NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE from otherwise LATIN / ARABIC or OTHER BINOMIAL
LINGUISTIC GROUPS by its pantomime and regular patterning which
undertaken by INTERNET MILITIA is intentioned upon #325 {MAGIC SUM OF
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5,
#9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] =
paradidomi (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
@1: "to give into the hands (of another)",
@2: "to give over into (one's) power or use",
@2a: "to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage",
@2b: "to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished,
scourged, tormented, put to death",
@2c: "to deliver up treacherously",
@2c1: "by betrayal to cause one to be taken",
@2c2: "to deliver one to be taught, moulded",
@2d: "to commit, to commend",
@2e: "to deliver verbally",
@2e1: "commands, rites",
@2e2: "*TO* *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, to report",
@2f: "to permit allow",
@2f1: "when the fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits",
@2f2: "gives itself up, presents itself"
Due to the gravitas and propensity of such becoming an acute and risky
precipice consideration in the circumstance of the CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING #273 as *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY*
in my view the *ISOPSEPHIC* extents of the GEMATRIA {ie. the
*ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3373 v's #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY} /
UMBRA {ie. as having the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #3260 and not #800 as
false presupposition} as threshold in having an equivalence to the
*ORDINAL* value of 26th letter to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages
AS THEN CAUSAL FOR OUR INVESTIGATION INTO THE EUROPEAN UNION NOTION OF
STATE AS HYPOTHETICAL OF IT BEING IN GREAT AND IMMANENT PERIL SUCH THAT
I ENVISIONED THERE WILL BE RENEWED IMPETUS FOR NEGOTIATED COOPERATION
DURING BREXIT:
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
{29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION
OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH
{#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
#111 % #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b)
the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for
this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment)
It also includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in
adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing
passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b)
chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for
their amendment);
And thusly my reasonable objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 -
substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 - WREATHS & SOVEREIGNTY / #288
- MEMORIAL & ANTI-SEMITISM / #419 - SLAUGHTER} war dead and usurping the
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOGENEOUS basis to our Commonwealth's
Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 /
#21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent {
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
} as the instrumentation of Federation into a nation.
WHICH MIGHT REASONABLY AND PREDICTABLY BE CONSIDERED THAT THE *PRO*
*DOMO* *VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* IS A PERVERSE AND DELIBERATE
SEDITION {#444 - *SPORT* OF COMBAT} BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO THE
AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION) {
@65 {*SOLDIER*} - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
} AGAINST BOTH THE PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION (#364 - ENQUIRY) {
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81
} AND PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - CONTRADICTION) {
@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27
} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND THE PROBITY OF JUDGES
WITHIN AUSTRALIA AS TO WHY ONE CANNOT GET ANY CONSIDERATION OF JUSTICE
FOR ADHERING TO THESE TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLES WHICH ALL INHABITANTS MUST
ADHERE *TO* *AS* FIRST PRINCIPLES OF EXISTENCE AS THAT WHICH OUGHT TO
PROCEED BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE *AND* *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *OUR* *JUDICIAL*
*SYSTEM* WHOM UNDER SECTION III the "GOVERNOR GENERAL MAY CONSTITUTE AND
APPOINT, IN OUR NAME AND ON OUR BEHALF, ALL SUCH JUDGES, COMMISSIONERS,
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, AND OTHER NECESSARY OFFICERS AND MINISTERS OF OUR
SAID COMMONWEALTH, AS MAY BE *LAWFULLY* *CONSTITUTED* OR APPOINTED BY
US" IN ACCORD WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY
PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE ✡️ / ☯️ #164 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY = #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)
BEING ORGANISATION AS PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY FOR #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) {@175 {*MARRIAGE*} - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 -
ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS
FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 =
107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #6 x #364 = #2184:
#1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
#175 {*MARRIAGE*} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL {DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)} {#5 -
last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 - Granting forgiveness}
(1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY}]) / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature:
{DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature} [#175
{*MARRIAGE*} / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature] ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD: *PAPAL* *BREACHES* *OF* *SOVEREIGNTY*
*BY* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *SOLAR* *ECLIPSE* 9 JUNE 2018]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) *AN* *ENCOMPASSING*, *COMPASS*, *CIRCUIT*;
2) that which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS
QUEEN VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 -
FREEDOM from #1827 - OPPRESSION which is derived from a LOGICAL fallacy
in being reliant upon the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #800 as threshold for
its CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus made against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #284 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#289 as [#5, #70, #9, #200, #5] = `atarah (H5850): {UMBRA: #7 as #284 %
#41 = #38} 1) *CROWN*, *WREATH*;
ARE BESTOWING ONLY A CONTEMPT BY IGNORANCE AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT AS PRESENTS {ie.
HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12] as
*GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} BY AN *INCESSANT* *SOCIAL* *ENGINEERING* WHICH IS
HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {
+0, 27, 54,
+0, 9, 18,
+0, 3, 6,
+1, 2, 3
@1 {#1 - HEAR, O ISRAEL; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD [Mark 12:29]} +
@2 {#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} +
@3 {#81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION} +
@4 {#369 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTÀTIS} =
@10 {#492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #12 = #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} <—
IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON
} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE* ENTITLEMENT RIGHT
} BEING SELF JUSTIFICATIONS IN AND OF THEMSELVES {
@1 {#1 - HEAR, O ISRAEL; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD [Mark 12:29]} +
@2 {#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} +
@3 {#81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} +
@5 {#369 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTÀTIS} =
@15 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO CENSURE / #41 = #15
- PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY}
Just as little can the cosmological ideas of the beginning of the world
or the eternity of the world {*A* *PARTE* *ANTE* and its converse: *A*
*PARTE* *POST*} help us to explain any event in the world itself.
CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
CIRCULARITY?:
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
{
"derivation" : "from G5143 (τροχός);",
"kjv_def" : "course",
"lemma" : "τροχός",
"frequency" : 1,
"strongs_def" : " a wheel (as a runner), i.e. (figuratively) a circuit
of physical effects",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a wheel"
},
"strongs" : "G5164",
"xlit" : "trochós",
"umbra" : {
"1340" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"1190" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70, 50], "1340" : [300, 100, 70, 600, 70,
200]
}
},
{
"derivation" : "from the same as G1074 (γένεσις);",
"kjv_def" : "generation, nature(-ral)",
"lemma" : "γένεσις",
"frequency" : 5,
"strongs_def" : " nativity; figuratively, nature",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "source, origin",
"@1a" : "a book of one's lineage, i.e. in which his ancestry or
progeny are enumerated",
"@2" : "used of birth, nativity",
"@3" : "of that which follows origin, viz. existence, life",
"@3a" : "the wheel of life (Jas 3:6), other explain it, the wheel of
human origin which as soon as men are born begins to run, i.e. its
course of life"
},
"strongs" : "G1078",
"xlit" : "génesis",
"umbra" : {
"473" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 10, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"473" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 10, 200], "1268" : [3, 5, 50, 5, 200, 5,
800, 200]
}
}
Which Immanuel Kant has cautioned against in accordance with a correct
maxim of natural philosophy, we must refrain from all explanations of
the organization of nature drawn from the will of a supreme being,
because this is no longer natural philosophy but an admission that we
have come to the end of it.
*JEWISH* *CHRONOLOGICAL* / *MATHEMATICAL* *VIEW* *OF* *NATURAL* /
*COMMON* *AND* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW* *AS* *SYLLOGISTIC* *MICROCOSM*
Being constituted by the three higher numbers of the Decade and which
stand for the invisible and metempirical philosophical and metaphysical
theology as the Torah's which is an Intellectual Property to an AUTONOMY
OF WILL conveying the claim of Natural and Common Law as the Universal
basis to an egalitarian right derived from a legitimate cosmogonic
perspective establishing the existence of a sovereign autonomous right
to govern which is expressed lawfully by a logical syllogism by the
first three 3 ordinance statements of the 10 Commandments.
In English, Natural Law is a term is frequently employed as equivalent
to the laws of nature, meaning the order which governs the activities of
the material universe:
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
"AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, 'I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
BEFORE ME..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
AS BEING A VALID LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
"... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND *FOURTH* GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE
ME; AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
COMMANDMENTS..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
4. FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW AS SOVEREIGNTY / *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
{3W1D}
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80 - Serug {Branch, Layer; twining}]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30 - Arphaxad {I shall fail as the breast:
he cursed the breast-bottle, A healer; a releaser}]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7 - Enoch {Initiated. Figuratively to
initiate or discipline; dedicate, train up}]
5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2 - Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God
has heard my prayer and has delivered me out of affliction. Power &
Strength; put; who puts; fixed}]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100 - Terah {Station, delay, a station of
Israel in the wilderness, To breathe; scent; blow}]
6. FORMULA OF AUTONOMY AS INDIVIDUAL / *DO* *NOT* *KILL*
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50 - Heber {The region beyond, One that
passes; anger}]
7. FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *AVOID* *SPIRITUAL* *ADULTERY* *AS*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* {CIRCA 49J7W} [John 5:43-47]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9 - Lamech {Powerful, Poor; made low}]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4 - Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively
a chamber or dwelling:-nest, room), buyer; owner}]
8. DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) AS OBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY
/ *DO* *NOT* *STEAL* {72J + 3(3²+1)/2}
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300 - Isaac {He laughs}]
9. BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?) AS FAUX SUBJECTIVE
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
"Infinity itself is the actual Logos as concept. Both the 'logical' and
the 'subjective' grounding of infinity--as we call them in short--are
already carried out in the thoroughly concrete investigation ... [and
found that] everything [was] still at the beginning and is more within
the scope of a confrontation with tradition; it has not yet found its
own necessary shape.
This happens for the first time in the 'System of Science' {ie. The
science, whose system is at issue, is the totality of the highest and
most essential knowledge as philosophy--The way in which philosophy
unfolds itself as absolute knowledge. By providing all sciences with
their foundation, philosophy must certainly be a science}, whose first
part, the Phenomenology, represents the grounding we mentioned as our
2nd point (the grounding of infinity in the subject and as subject),
while the second part, the Logic, implements the 1st grounding that we
mentioned above (the logical grounding), which is inherently and
necessarily grounded in the 2nd one." [Martin Heidegger (1889-1976 CE),
'Mediatedness & the Dialectical Movement' on 'Hegel's Phenomenology of
Spirit', p 78]
THE LOGOS AS THE FAUX LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#AYIN / #70 - Reu {Friend, His friend; his shepherd}
as 'eye', 'to see', and by extension, to understand and obey, it
represents the primeval light, that is the spiritual light of God
[Genesis 1:3] as distinct to the celestial lights [Genesis 1:14-18]] =
#0 CE as BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?) AS FAUX LOGICAL
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS* *BY*
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN &
WICKEDNESS?) being a binary (ie. gender and spermatic as bifurcated
entities) unnatural autonomic transformative prototype imposed upon the
biological natural order and commences the symbolic associator series as
the MACROCOSM:
#15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE, #111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20 - Shem {Exhalted Name, Name, renown}] =
#400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6 - Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding;
coming down}] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1 - Adam {Taken from 4 corners, Earthy;
red}] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90 - Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}] =
#1600 CE
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
"...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
10. MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA DENUNTIANS) / *DO* *NOT* *COVET* {122J3W1D +
9(9²+1)/2}
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses} as waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the
spring of Torah being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = #2000 Y2K /
Equinox of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 + (5 *
364) + 182 days = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
THE LOGOS AS THE SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY IN THE SUBJECT AND AS
MY BESTOWED ETERNITY
The ENNEAD of THOTH as Anthropic Cosmological Principle appears
equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8 - Methuselah {Man of the dart/javelin
(weapon, missile, sprout), He has sent his death}]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3 - Enosh {Husband, (certain, mortal) man;
sick; despaired of; forgetful}]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200 - Abraham {Father of a multitude, chief
of multitude}]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60 - Peleg {Division}]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10 - Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5 - Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [(c) 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
NOTE: That within the year 2019, the full moon will come on 21 March
(after the spring equinox). Yet, the ecclesiastical Easter will fall on
21 April 2019 by which concludes the cycle as a process of #236 -
PAIRING relativity intentioned upon implementation of a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which given the absence of any viable
*reverse*-*transcriptase* *inhibitor* natural process (as discussed
below with the #288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE {*REGENERATION*}:
@1 = @728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD},
@5 = PENTECOST {#FIVE: + 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY WHICH *CONFLICTS*
*WITH* *ARCHBISHOP* *GEORGE* *PELL'S* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* AT
SAINT PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CATHEDRAL, MELBOURNE UPON PENTECOST SUNDAY /
BEERSHEBA MEMORIAL DAY OF 31 MAY 1998 AND PENTECOST {#382 - *THE*
*SCIENCE* *INTO* *A* *PERMANENT* *STATE*; #383; #384; #385; #386} OF
SUNDAY 11 JUNE 2000 (SOLAR ECLIPSE YEAR FOLLOWING: 21 JUNE Prototype:
*HOMOIOS* {#382 / #385} / HETEROS {#384 / #386} / TORAH {#378 / #383}):
#337 as [#30, #50, #7, #200, #10, #40] = naziyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #7 as
#267 % #41 = #21} 1) consecrated or devoted one, Nazarite; 1a)
*CONSECRATED* *ONE*; 1b) *DEVOTEE*, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#474 as [#100, #4, #10, #300, #10, #50] = qaddiysh (Aramaic) (H6922):
{UMBRA: #6 as #414 % #41 = #4} 1) *HOLY*, *SEPARATE*; 2) (TWOT)
*ANGELS*, *SAINTS*;
},
#65 = *SOLDIER*,
#175 = *MARRIAGE*
THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY
EXPLANTATION AND SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY TO JEWISH
/ CHRISTIAN APOSTLES AS A SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION OF NAZARENES / #509 -
YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY [Acts 24:1-6; Acts 28:17-22] WHICH WAS
INITIALLY CONVEYED WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18
NOVEMBER 2018.
“THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} ENTERED INTO THE JUDGMENT HALL AGAIN,
AND CALLED JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH
{SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART; SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED},
AND SAID UNTO HIM, ART THOU THE #410 - *KING* OF THE JEWS?
H3468@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 16 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 57 (#97),
@4: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 70 (#167),
Male: #91; Feme: #167
} // #410
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166
#410 as [#30, #10, #300, #70] = yesha` (H3468): {UMBRA: #9 as #380 % #41
= #11} 1) *DELIVERANCE*, *SALVATION*, *RESCUE*, *SAFETY*, *WELFARE*; 1a)
safety, welfare, prosperity; 1b) salvation; 1c) victory;
JESUS ANSWERED HIM, SAYEST THOU THIS THING OF THYSELF, OR DID OTHERS
TELL IT THEE OF ME?
PILATE ANSWERED, AM I A JEW? THINE OWN NATION AND THE CHIEF PRIESTS HAVE
DELIVERED {ie. #325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1,
#100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100,
#1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as
#582 % #41 = #8}} THEE UNTO ME: WHAT HAST THOU DONE?
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN (3.8.3.19.0)@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 61 (#95); Ego: 27 (#61),
@3: Sup: 80 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 19 (#80),
@4: Sup: 48 (#223); Ego: 49 (#129),
@5: Sup: 2 (#225); Ego: 35 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@6: Sup: 81 (#306); Ego: 79 (#243),
@7: Sup: 1 (#307); Ego: 1 (#244),
@8: Sup: 34 (#341 - SEE BELOW KANT'S IDEA: *ONE* *CAN* *TINKER*
*AROUND* *WITH* #41 {#329} - *METAPHYSICS* *IN* *SUNDRY* *WAYS*
*WITHOUT* *EVEN* *SUSPECTING* *THAT* *ONE* *MIGHT* *BE* *VENTURING*
*INTO* *UNTRUTH* / *WHETHER* *THE* *WORLD* *HAS* *EXISTED* *FROM*
*ETERNITY*, *OR* *HAS* *A* *BEGINNING*?); Ego: 33 (#277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
A TEST),
@9: Sup: 79 (#420 - *VAULT* *OF* *THE* *HEAVENS*, *FIRMAMENT* *AS*
*BINDING* *EARTH* *TO* *THE* *HEAVENS*); Ego: 45 (#322),
Male: #420; Feme: #322
}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #52 AS IDEA @341: "*ONE*
*CAN* *TINKER* *AROUND* *WITH* #41 {#329} - *METAPHYSICS* *IN* *SUNDRY*
*WAYS* *WITHOUT* *EVEN* *SUSPECTING* *THAT* *ONE* *MIGHT* *BE*
*VENTURING* *INTO* *UNTRUTH*. For if only we do not contradict ourselves
– something that is indeed entirely possible with synthetic, though
completely fanciful, propositions – then we can never be refuted by
experience in all such cases where the concepts we connect are mere
ideas, which can by no means be given (in their entire content) in
experience. For how would we decide through experience: *WHETHER* *THE*
*WORLD* *HAS* *EXISTED* *FROM* *ETERNITY*, *OR* *HAS* *A* *BEGINNING*?
Whether matter is infinitely divisible, or is constituted out of simple
parts? Concepts such as these cannot be given in any experience (even
the greatest possible), and so the falsity of the affirmative or
negative thesis cannot be discovered through that touchstone.
*THE* *SINGLE* *POSSIBLE* *CASE* *IN* *WHICH* *REASON* *WOULD* *REVEAL*
(*AGAINST* *ITS* *WILL*) *ITS* *SECRET* *DIALECTIC* (*WHICH* *IT*
*FALSELY* *PASSES* *OFF* *AS* *DOGMATICS*:
H4378@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 60 (#100); Ego: 20 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#117); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#144); Ego: 10 (#108),
@5: Sup: 47 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 20 (#128),
@6: Sup: 6 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#168
- I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #197; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #260 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140
#330 as [#40, #20, #200, #10, #20, #40] = makkar (H4378): {UMBRA: #6 as
#260 % #41 = #14} 1) acquaintance, *FRIEND*;
"THE JEWS CRIED OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT
CAESAR’S #330 - *FRIEND*: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A #410 - *KING*
SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12 (KJV)]
) *WOULD* *BE* *THAT* *IN* *WHICH* *IT* *BASED* *AN* *ASSERTION* *ON*
*A* *UNIVERSALLY* *ACKNOWLEDGED* *PRINCIPLE*, *AND*, *WITH* *THE*
*GREATEST* *PROPRIETY* *IN* *THE* *MODE* *OF* *INFERENCE*, *DERIVED*
*THE* *DIRECT* *OPPOSITE* *FROM* *ANOTHER* *EQUALLY* *ACCREDITED*
*PRINCIPLE*. Now this case is here actual, and indeed is so with respect
to *FOUR* *NATURAL* *IDEAS* *OF* *REASON*, from which there arise – each
with proper consistency and from universally acknowledged principles –
four assertions on one side and just as many counter assertions on the
other, thereby revealing the dialectical illusion of pure reason in the
use of these principles, which otherwise would have had to remain
forever hidden.
H7256@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 40 (#78); Ego: 2 (#40),
@3: Sup: 29 (#107); Ego: 70 (#110),
@4: Sup: 39 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 10 (#120),
@5: Sup: 79 (#225); Ego: 40 (#160),
Male: #225; Feme: #160
} // #322
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; *I* *AM* *NOT* *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *WEEPING* *TO* *ANY*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#322 as [#200, #2, #70, #10, #40] = ribbea` (H7256): {UMBRA: #6 as #272
% #41 = #26} 1) pertaining to the *FOURTH*;
"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD
thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children unto the third and *FOURTH* {#322 as [#200, #2, #70, #10, #40]
= ribbea` (H7256): fourth} generation of them that hate me;" [Exodus
20:5 (KJV)]
Here is, therefore, a decisive test, which must necessarily disclose to
us [IDEA: @341] a fault that lies hidden in the presuppositions of reason:
NOTE: I therefore desire that the critical reader concern himself
mainly with this antinomy {ie. a #312 - *CONTRADICTION* between two
beliefs or conclusions that are in themselves reasonable; a paradox},
because *NATURE* *ITSELF* *SEEMS* *TO* *HAVE* *SET* *IT* *UP* *TO*
*MAKE* *REASON* *SUSPICIOUS* *IN* *ITS* *BOLD* *CLAIMS* *AND* *TO*
*FORCE* *A* *SELF*-*EXAMINATION*. I promise to answer for each proof I
have given of both thesis and antithesis, and thereby to establish the
certainty of the inevitable antinomy of reason. If the reader is
induced, through this strange phenomenon, to reexamine the
presupposition that underlies it, he will then feel constrained to
investigate more deeply with me the *PRIMARY* *FOUNDATION* *OF* *ALL*
*COGNITION* *THROUGH* *PURE* *REASON*.
Of two mutually contradictory propositions both cannot be false save
when the concept underlying them both is itself contradictory; e.g., the
two propositions: a square circle is round, and: a square circle is not
round, are both false. For, as regards the first, it is false that the
aforementioned circle is round, since it is square; but it is also false
that it is not round, i.e., has corners, since it is a circle. The
logical mark of the impossibility of a concept consists, then, in this:
that under the presupposition of this concept, two contradictory
propositions would be false simultaneously; and since between these two
no third proposition can be thought, through this concept nothing at all
is thought." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @341, pages 92-93]
Nous: #36
Time: 06:45 hrs
Date: 2019.7.3
Torah:
Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering
#260 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - *FRIEND* / *REBELLIOUS* / #410 - *YESHUA* /
*KING*} / HETEROS {#352 - *A* *PROVING* *TRIAL* / *MARY* / #421 -
*EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*} / TORAH {#373 - *FROM* *TRUTH* *INTO* *ERROR* /
#472 - *CURSE*}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:7,nous:36&idea:{m,330}&idea:{f,410}&idea:{m,352}&idea:{f,421}&idea:{m,373}&idea:{f,472}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 7, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.7.3, Time: 06:45
hrs, Super: #330 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #410 / #36 -
Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]
JESUS ANSWERED, *MY* *KINGDOM* *IS* *NOT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*: *IF* *MY*
*KINGDOM* *WERE* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*, *THEN* *WOULD* *MY* *SERVANTS*
*FIGHT*,
HALLELUJAH (2.3.7.36.0)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 36 (#117); Ego: 36 (#117),
@3: Sup: 22 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 67 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 8 (#147); Ego: 67 (#251),
@5: Sup: 24 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 16
(#267),
@6: Sup: 55 (#226); Ego: 31 (#298),
@7: Sup: 41 (#267); Ego: 67 (#365),
@8: Sup: 58 (#325 - THAT I SHOULD NOT BE #330 - *DELIVERED* {#325 /
#260} TO THE JEWS: BUT NOW IS MY #410 - *KINGDOM* NOT FROM HENCE); Ego:
17 (#382),
@9: Sup: 5 (#330); Ego: 28 (#410),
Male: #330; Feme: #410
}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #43 AS IDEA @330: "In the
Critique I always gave my greatest attention not only to how I could
distinguish carefully the types of cognition, but also to how I could
derive all the concepts belonging to each type from their common source,
so that I might not only, by learning their origin, be able to determine
their use with certainty, but also might have the inestimable advantage
(never yet imagined) of cognizing a priori, hence according to
principles, the completeness of the enumeration, classification, and
specification of the [IDEA: @330] concepts.
YOUTUBE: "Hallelujah (Pentatonix)"
Failing this, everything in metaphysics is nothing but rhapsody, in
which one never knows whether what one has is enough, or whether and
where something may still be lacking. Such an advantage is, of course,
available only in pure philosophy, but it constitutes the essence of
that philosophy.
Since I had found the origin of the categories in the four logical
functions of all judgments of the understanding, it was completely
natural to look for the origin of the ideas in the three functions of
syllogisms (i.e., inferences of reason); for once such pure concepts of
reason (transcendental ideas) have been granted, then, if they are not
to be taken for innate, they could indeed be found nowhere else except
in this very act of reason, which, insofar as it relates merely to form,
constitutes the logical in syllogisms, but, insofar as it represents the
judgments of the understanding as determined with respect to one or
another a priori form, constitutes the transcendental concepts of pure
reason.
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762;
A RESTATEMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES PREMISE:
G2470@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 37 (#95); Ego: 70 (#118),
@4: Sup: 6 (#101); Ego: 50 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #101; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #480 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#330 as [#10, #200, #70, #50] = isos (G2470): {UMBRA: #24 as #480 % #41
= #29} 1) *EQUAL*, *IN* *QUANTITY* *OR* *QUALITY*;
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
The formal distinction of syllogisms necessitates their division into
categorical, hypothetical, and disjunctive. Therefore the concepts of
reason based thereupon contain first, the idea of the complete subject
(the sub-stantial), second, the idea of the complete series of
conditions, and third, the determination of all concepts in the idea of
a complete sum total of the possible.∗ *THE* *FIRST* *IDEA* *WAS*
*PSYCHOLOGICAL*, *THE* *SECOND* *COSMOLOGICAL*, *THE* *THIRD*
*THEOLOGICAL*; *AND* *SINCE* *ALL* *THREE* *GIVE* *RISE* *TO* *A*
*DIALECTIC*, but each in its own way, all this provided the basis for
dividing the entire dialectic of pure reason into the paralogism, the
antinomy, and finally the ideal of pure reason – through which
derivation it is rendered completely certain that all claims of pure
reason are represented here in full, and not one can be missing, since
the faculty of reason itself, whence they all originate, is thereby
fully surveyed." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @330, pages 82-83]
THAT I SHOULD NOT BE #330 - *DELIVERED* {#325 / #260} TO THE JEWS: BUT
NOW IS MY #410 - *KINGDOM* NOT FROM HENCE.
H4560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 49 (#149); Ego: 60 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#155); Ego: 38 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #155; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#330 as [#30, #40, #60, #200] = macar (H4560): {UMBRA: #7 as #300 % #41
= #13} 1) *TO* *SET* *APART*, *DELIVER* *UP*, *OFFER*; 1a) (Qal) to set
apart; 1b) (Niphal) to be delivered over, be assigned to, be set apart;
H4428@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 16 (#73); Ego: 40 (#97),
@3: Sup: 46 (#119); Ego: 30 (#127),
@4: Sup: 66 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 20
(#147),
@5: Sup: 5 (#190); Ego: 20 (#167),
Male: #190; Feme: #167
} // #410
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#410 as [#300, #40, #30, #20, #20] = melek (H4428): {UMBRA: #10 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) *KING*;
PILATE THEREFORE SAID UNTO HIM, ART THOU A #410 - *KING* THEN? JESUS
ANSWERED, THOU SAYEST THAT I AM A #410 - *KING*. TO THIS END WAS I BORN,
AND FOR THIS CAUSE CAME I INTO THE WORLD, THAT I SHOULD BEAR WITNESS
UNTO THE TRUTH. EVERY ONE THAT IS OF THE TRUTH HEARETH MY VOICE .
SEE ALSO: "*VOX* *POPULI* *VOX* *DEI*"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Vox%20Populi%20Vox%20Dei.pdf>
PILATE SAITH UNTO HIM, WHAT IS TRUTH? AND WHEN HE HAD SAID THIS, HE WENT
OUT AGAIN UNTO THE JEWS, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, I FIND IN HIM NO #330 -
*FAULT* AT ALL.
H2642@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 14 (#20); Ego: 8 (#14),
@3: Sup: 74 (#94); Ego: 60 (#74),
@4: Sup: 31 (#125); Ego: 38 (#112),
@5: Sup: 37 (#162); Ego: 6 (#118),
@6: Sup: 6 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego:
50 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #168; Feme: #168
} // #330
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #324 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#330 as [#6, #8, #60, #200, #6, #50] = checrown (H2642): {UMBRA: #0 as
#324 % #41 = #37} 1) *THE* *THING* *LACKING*, *DEFECT*, *DEFICIENCY*;
BUT YE HAVE A CUSTOM, THAT I SHOULD RELEASE UNTO YOU ONE AT THE
PASSOVER: WILL YE THEREFORE THAT I RELEASE UNTO YOU THE KING OF THE
JEWS?” [John 18:33-39 (KJV)]
Drawing then upon this temporal notion from 'TIME TO TIME' as #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY which severally appears within QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900:
THE PREAMBLE: "Office of Governor General shall be FROM TIME TO TIME
APPOINTED"
SECTION VIII: "In the event of his death, #273 - *INCAPACITY*, or #473 -
*ABSENCE* {ie.
"AND THEY DREW ALEXANDER {ONE WHO ASSISTS MEN} OUT OF THE MULTITUDE, THE
JEWS PUTTING HIM FORWARD. AND ALEXANDER BECKONED WITH THE HAND, AND
WOULD HAVE MADE HIS DEFENCE UNTO THE PEOPLE {#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70,
#200] = demos (G1218): people}." [Acts 19:33 (KJV)]
From the Greek: dēmos meaning: free citizens, sovereign people; popular
government, democracy; popular assembly as having by implication an
*ISOPSEPHIC* equivalence to the #1340 - COURSE-trochos OF #473 -
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as a circularity
Nous: #19
Time: 18:50 hrs
Date: 2019.1.3
Torah: [#10, #8, #6]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 18 (#28); Ego: 8 (#18),
@3: Sup: 24 (#52); Ego: 6 (#24),
Male: #52; Feme: #24
} // #24
Dao: Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity
Tetra: #58 - Gathering In
I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations
Latin: Recordabilis {God who knows all things} Alt: Haziel {Seeing of God} {
1. PROTECTOR OF PRINCES, SERVES TO UNCOVER PLOTS & TRAITORS
2. IN UNDOING THEIR PLANS
3. JUST RULERS
4. Ouestucati
}
David {Well-beloved, dear}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - *VAULT* *OF* *THE* *HEAVENS*, *FIRMAMENT*
*AS* *BINDING* *EARTH* *TO* *THE* *HEAVENS* / #322 - *FREE* *CITIZENS*,
*SOVEREIGN* *PEOPLE*; *POPULAR* *GOVERNMENT*, *DEMOCRACY*; *POPULAR*
*ASSEMBLY*} / HETEROS {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} /
TORAH {#369 - DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:8,col:3,nous:19&idea:{m,420}&idea:{f,322}&idea:{m,404}&idea:{f,314}&idea:{m,369}&idea:{f,337}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 19 [Date: 2019.1.3, Time: 18:50
hrs, Super: #420 / #80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in
Isolation; I-Ching: H16 - Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For,
Excess; Tetra: 23 - Ease, Ego: #322 / #19 - Argument for Ethical
Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle
Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #44 AS IDEA @322: "If one
considers the properties of the circle by which this figure unifies in a
universal rule at once so many arbitrary determinations of the space
within it, one cannot refrain from ascribing a nature to this
geometrical thing. Thus, in particular, two lines that intersect each
other and also the circle, however they happen to be drawn, nonetheless
always partition each other in a regular manner such that the rectangle
from the parts of one line is equal to that from the other. Now I ask:
“Does this law lie in the circle, or does it lie in the understanding?”
i.e., does this figure, independent of the understanding, contain the
basis for this law in itself, or does the understanding, since it has
itself constructed the figure in accordance with its concepts (namely,
the equality of the radii), at the same time insert into it the law that
chords cut one another in geometrical proportion?
If [IDEA: @321] one traces the proofs of this law, one soon sees that it
can be derived only from the condition on which the understanding based
the construction of this figure, namely, the equality of the radii. If
we now expand upon this concept so as to follow up still further the
unity of the manifold properties of geometrical figures under common
laws, and we consider the circle as a conic section, which is therefore
subject to the very same fundamental conditions of construction as other
conic sections, we then find that all chords that intersect within these
latter (within the ellipse, the parabola, and the hyperbola) always do
so in such a way that the rectangles from their parts are not indeed
equal, but always stand to one another in equal proportions. If from
there we go still further, namely to the *FUNDAMENTAL* *DOCTRINES* *OF*
*PHYSICAL* *ASTRONOMY*, there appears a physical law of reciprocal
attraction, extending to all material nature, the rule of which is that
these attractions decrease inversely with the square of the distance
from each point of attraction, exactly as the spherical surfaces into
which this force spreads itself increase, something that seems to reside
as necessary in the nature of the things themselves and which therefore
is customarily presented as cognizable a priori.
<Loading Image...
>[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion on 3 JULY {#330 / #410} and 147,000,000+
kilometers for perihelion on 3 JANUARY {#420 / #322}: Gothika (vector
image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY SA 3.0, via
Wikimedia Commons @ <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]
The elliptical shape of Earth's orbit causes the variation in the length
of the seasons – and brings us closest to the sun in January. Bottom
line: In 2019, Earth's closest point to the sun – called its perihelion
– comes on January 3 at 05:20 Universal Time (on January 2 at 11:20 p.m.
CST). For an object moving in an elliptical orbit about another
celestial body, the point of closest approach is called the periapsis
(from the Greek peri = near). At this point in the orbit, the object is
travelling at its greatest speed (Kepler’s Second Law).
As simple as are the sources of this law – in that they rest merely on
the relation of spherical surfaces with different radii – the
consequence therefrom is nonetheless so excellent with respect to the
variety and regularity of its agreement that not only does it follow
that all possible orbits of the celestial bodies are conic sections, but
also that their mutual relations are such that no other law of
attraction save that of the inverse square of the distances can be
*CONCEIVED* *AS* *SUITABLE* *FOR* *A* *SYSTEM* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*.
G1218@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 12 (#16); Ego: 8 (#12),
@3: Sup: 52 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 40 (#52),
@4: Sup: 41 (#109); Ego: 70 (#122),
@5: Sup: 79 (#188); Ego: 38 (#160),
Male: #188; Feme: #160
} // #322
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #322 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70, #200] = demos (G1218): {UMBRA: #11 as #322 %
#41 = #35} 1) *THE* *PEOPLE*, the mass of people assembled in a public
place;
Here then is nature that rests on laws that the understanding cognizes a
priori, and indeed chiefly from universal principles of the
determination of space. Now I ask: do these laws of nature lie in space,
and does the understanding learn them in that it merely seeks to
investigate the wealth of meaning that lies in space, or do they lie in
the understanding and in the way in which it determines space in
accordance with the conditions of the synthetic unity toward which its
concepts are one and all directed? *SPACE* *IS* *SOMETHING* *SO*
*UNIFORM*, *AND* *SO* *INDETERMINATE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *ALL*
*SPECIFIC* *PROPERTIES*, *THAT* *CERTAINLY* *NO* *ONE* *WILL* *LOOK*
*FOR* *A* *STOCK* *OF* *NATURAL* *LAWS* *WITHIN* *IT*. By contrast, that
which determines space into the figure of a circle, a cone, or a sphere
is the understanding, insofar as it contains the basis [IDEA: @322] for
the unity of the construction of these figures. The bare universal form
of intuition called space is therefore certainly the substratum of all
intuitions determinable upon particular objects, and, admittedly, the
condition for the possibility and variety of those intuitions lies in
this space; but the unity of the objects is determined solely through
the understanding, and indeed according to conditions that reside in its
own nature; and so the understanding is the origin of the universal
order of nature, in that it comprehends all appearances under its own
laws and thereby first brings about experience a priori (with respect to
its form), in virtue of which everything that is to be cognized only
through experience is necessarily subject to its laws. For we are not
concerned with the nature of the things in themselves, which is
independent of the conditions of both our senses and understanding, but
with nature as an object of possible experience, and here the
understanding, since it makes experience possible, at the same time
makes it that the sensible world is either not an object of experience
at all, or else is nature." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @322,
pages 73-74]
YOUTUBE: "*HOLY* *HOLY* *HOLY* *GOD* *ALMIGHTY*(Agnus Dei)
"AND THE PEOPLE {#322 as [#4, #8, #40, #70, #200] = demos (G1218):
people} GAVE A SHOUT, SAYING, IT IS THE VOICE OF A GOD, AND NOT OF A
MAN." [Acts 12:22 (KJV)]
}, to such person or persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our
said Commonwealth."
{
"derivation" : "from G575 (ἀπόδημος) and G1218 (ἀπόδημος);",
"kjv_def" : "taking a far journey",
"lemma" : "ἀπόδημος",
"frequency" : 1,
"strongs_def" : " absent from one's own people, i.e. a foreign traveller",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "away from one's people, go abroad"
},
"strongs" : "G590",
"xlit" : "apódēmos",
"umbra" : {
"473" : [1, 80, 70, 4, 8, 40, 70, 200]
},
"gematria" : {
"473" : [1, 80, 70, 4, 8, 40, 70, 200]
}
}
SECTION IX: "FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE,
ALTER, OR AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET"
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE* / PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE {#205} - DISCRIMINATING NORM {#369} / PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
{#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS / PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 X 7 = #2184}]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
— FORTUNE COOKIE ANYONE? —
[Posted @ 0447 hours on 20 February 2019]
"CONTRADICTION CONTRADICTION.
THAT'S ALL WHICH I HEAR. {@3: Sup: 15 (#121); Ego: 77 (#130 - I AM NOT
EVIL MINDED {%3})},
SUCH OPINION OF MALEDICTION. {@4: Sup: 49 (#170); Ego: 62 (#192 - I AM
NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39})},
IT'S REALLY WITHOUT PEER. {@5: Sup: 27 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY
SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 20 (#212)},
BUT YOUR MIND IS SO SMALL.
LITTLE WONDER OF TRUTH TELL.
CHINESE MARXISM AND IT'S #410 - PALL.
CERTAINLY KNOWS DEATH'S #410 - KNELL." {@9: Sup: 61 (#331: SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA); Ego: 3 (#313)},
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #44 AS IDEA @331: "[IDEA:
@331] In this examination it is in general further noteworthy: *THAT*
*THE* *IDEAS* *OF* *REASON* *ARE* *NOT*, *LIKE* *THE* *CATEGORIES*,
*HELPFUL* *TO* *US* *IN* *SOME* *WAY* *IN* *USING* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*
*WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *EXPERIENCE*, *BUT* *ARE* *COMPLETELY*
*DISPENSABLE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *SUCH* *USE*, *NAY*, *ARE*
*CONTRARY* *TO* *AND* *OBSTRUCTIVE* *OF* *THE* *MAXIMS* *FOR* *THE*
*COGNITION* *OF* *NATURE* *THROUGH* *REASON*, although they are still
quite necessary in another respect, yet to be determined. In explaining
the appearances of the soul, we can be completely indifferent to whether
it is a simple substance or not; for we are unable through any possible
experience to make the concept of a simple being sensorily intelligible,
hence intelligible *IN* *CONCRETO*; and this concept is therefore
completely empty with respect to all hoped-for insight into the cause of
the appearances, and cannot serve as a principle of explanation of that
which supplies inner or outer experience. JUST AS LITTLE CAN THE
COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD OR THE ETERNITY OF THE
WORLD {ie.
*A* *PARTE* *ANTE* is a term and its converse *A* *PARTE* *POST* that
are used to denote respectively the two notions of eternity in the past
and eternity in the future. These notions involve a #312 -
*CONTRADICTION*, inasmuch as the thought of eternity involves the
illimitable, and the present constitutes a limit both to the past and
the future. For the former, if we mean by the past eternity, infinite
time, we make it impossible that the present or any given moment should
ever be arrived at. For the latter, as we must start from the present,
we must substitute for the idea of eternity that of an endless future.
This #312 - *CONTRADICTION* results from giving eternity the definition
of infinite time, whereas it means independence of time, a state in
which all is alike present, a state which can never be that of the
creature, who can be endued with immortality, but cannot, like the high
and the lofty *ONE*, inhabit eternity which as the Latin phrase *NUNC*
*FLUENS*, Latin for "flowing now," is the belief in time and the flow of
it through an eternity, never beginning nor stopping. The constant
present of the latter has been entitled the Latin phrase *NUNC* *STANS*
for "abiding now," is the belief that time itself doesn't exist, and
that any distinctions between now, before and the future have either
fallen away or don't exist.
) HELP US TO EXPLAIN ANY EVENT IN THE WORLD ITSELF. FINALLY, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A CORRECT MAXIM OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY, WE MUST REFRAIN
FROM ALL EXPLANATIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF NATURE DRAWN FROM THE WILL
OF A SUPREME BEING, BECAUSE THIS IS NO LONGER NATURAL PHILOSOPHY BUT AN
ADMISSION THAT WE HAVE COME TO THE END OF IT.
These ideas therefore have a completely different determination of their
use from that of the categories, through which (and through the
principles built upon them) experience itself first became possible.
Nevertheless our laborious analytic of the understanding would have been
entirely superfluous, if our aim had been directed toward nothing other
than mere cognition of nature insofar as such cognition can be given in
experience; for reason conducts its affairs in both mathematics and
natural science quite safely and quite well, even without any such
subtle deduction; hence our critique of the understanding joins with the
ideas of pure reason for a purpose that lies beyond the use of the
understanding in experience, though we have said above that the use of
the understanding in this regard is wholly impossible and without object
or significance. There must nonetheless be agreement between what
belongs to the nature of reason and of the understanding, and the former
must contribute to the perfection of the latter and cannot possibly
confuse it.
The solution to this question is as follows: Pure reason does not, among
its ideas, have in view particular objects that might lie beyond the
field [IDEA: @332] of experience, but it merely demands completeness in
the use of the understanding in the connection of experience. This
completeness can, however, only be a completeness of principles, but not
of intuitions and objects. Nonetheless, in order to represent these
principles determinately, reason conceives of them as the cognition of
an object, cognition of which is completely determined with respect to
these rules – though the object is only an idea – so as to bring
cognition through the understanding as close as possible to the
completeness that this idea signifies." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY
OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @331,
pages 83-84]
A reasonable question in regard to the logical nature of its *IN*
*CONCRETO* grounding as *ONE* {ie.
THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
} that as argumentation is made of EMANATION theology in relation to the
perspective for instance of ASYLUM INFLUX which may be viewed as an
irrational product of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct to
imperial governance as artifice perspective of the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
dynamic.
Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:
A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.
The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the *POLICE*, *FIRE* *SERVICE*, *LOCAL* *GOVERNMENT* *BODIES*
*OR* *SCHOOLS*. [<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]
That MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of
an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law;
wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public trust
[Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com] by engaging
within allegedly irregular #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a PRIVATE
NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY OF AS
DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY BEING AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
“DIEU ET MON DROIT” was by CARPE DIEM VOCALISED OBJECTION an entirely
propitious characteristic as conformity to #873 - *PROBITY* and within
bounds of decorum as ontological pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY)
values which were compliant with the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET badge purchased the year prior
before Remembrance Day of 11 November 2016 and was not simply an action
of nostalgia by fanciful decoration being only a contrived dignity.
REGARDING ON THE PROVISION OF THE NECESSARY DETAILS BY THEN MAKING AN
APPLICATION UNDER REQUISITE LEGISLATION (perhaps: CHARTER OF HUMAN
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006) FOR THE #390 - CROWN TO MEET ALL
OUR LEGAL COSTS AND BEFORE ANY OTHER MATTERS CAN BE ADDRESSED, DIRECTING
TO THE NOMINATED BARRISTER THE QUESTION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANY
'FOREIGN POWER':
'YOU WILL TO YOUR UTTERMOST BEAR FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE UNTO THE QUEEN'S
MAJESTY {ie. @115 = *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*,
*AUTHORITY*, *POWER*)}; AND WILL ASSIST AND DEFEND ALL JURISDICTIONS,
PRE-EMINENCES, AND AUTHORITIES, GRANTED TO HER MAJESTY, AND ANNEXED TO
THE CROWN BY ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, OR *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL*
*FOREIGN* *PRINCES*, *PERSONS*, *PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR*
*POTENTATES*.' [ref: Queen Victoria's 29 OCTOBER 1900 Letters Patent to
AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL” dated 17 SEPTEMBER
1900 that is conveyed by the OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD / DIEU ET MON DROIT
which dates back to at least 1570]
Ought therefore to be unlawful conduct by any PUBLIC AUTHORITY under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1) Subject to this section, it is
unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible
with a human right or, in making a decision, to fail to give proper
consideration to a relevant human right.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if, as a result of a statutory
provision or a provision made by or under an Act of the Commonwealth or
otherwise under law, the public authority could not reasonably have
acted differently or made a different decision..
(3) This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
(4) Subsection (1) does not require a public authority to act in a way,
or make a decision, that has the effect of impeding or preventing a
religious body (including itself in the case of a public authority that
is a religious body) from acting in conformity with the religious
doctrines, beliefs or principles in accordance with which the religious
body operates.
(5) In this section religious body means—
(a) a body established for a religious purpose; or
(b) an entity that establishes, or directs, controls or administers, an
educational or other charitable entity that is intended to be, and is,
conducted in accordance with religious doctrines, beliefs or principles.
There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as PUBLIC AUTHORITY and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
Governor General as #2184 - ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.
In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a code of conduct and
circularity which as intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY as it’s grounding that as temporality is anchored within
49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J {ie. IPSO
FACTO: 49 as JULIAN YEAR x #2184 = 6J as 294 years x 364 = 107016 days /
293 years = 365.24232 TROPICAL YEAR as @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF*
*TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR*}.
As assistance to the considerations of the COURT we have in compliance
with the provisions of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900, hereby provided a justification for the #322 - *SOVEREIGNTY* *OF*
*THE* *PEOPLE* within their own right as democracy attributed by #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (which is inclusive of the indigenous populace as
aboriginals) by a narrative published within 1783 as OCCURRING 5 YEARS
BEFORE AUSTRALIA WAS INITIALLY LANDED UPON 18 JANUARY 1788 {ie.
BEING CONTRADICTION OF 16 to 20 JANUARY WITHIN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL
SCHEMA: #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 -
REMEMBER THE SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
TOTAL: @45 + @68 = #113 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (#364 - PRINCIPLE OF
ENQUIRY) #113 as [#6, #10, #6, #90, #1] = yatsa' (H3318): {UMBRA: #2 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) to go out, come out, exit, go forth; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to go or come out or forth, depart; 1a2) to go forth (to a place);
1a3) to go forward, proceed to (to or toward something); 1a4) to come or
go forth (with purpose or for result); 1a5) to come out of; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to go or come out, bring out, lead out; 1b2) to
bring out of; 1b3) to lead out; 1b4) to deliver; 1c) (Hophal) to be
brought out or forth;
H3318@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 22 (#44); Ego: 6 (#22),
@4: Sup: 31 (#75); Ego: 9 (#31),
@5: Sup: 32 (#107); Ego: 1 (#32),
Male: #107; Feme: #32
} // #113
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #113 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
"Go {#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} forth {#113
as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} of the ark, thou, and
thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee." [Genesis 8:16 (KJV)]
"Bring {#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} forth
{#113 as [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): out} with thee every
living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of
cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that
they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply
upon the earth." [Genesis 8:17 (KJV)]
} AND THE COLONY PROPER WAS ESTABLISHED BY ADMIRAL ARTHUR PHILLIP (11
October 1738 – 31 August 1814) AS A ROYAL NAVY OFFICER AND THE FIRST
GOVERNOR OF NEW SOUTH WALES UPON 26 JANUARY 1788 (AUSTRALIA DAY) {ie.
BEING CONTRADICTION OF 26 to 30 JANUARY WITHIN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL SCHEMA
*CORNERSTONE*: #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
TOTAL: @130 + @139 + #140 + @146 + @148 + @150 + @156 + @157 + @158 +
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC
PROGRESSION) [#3, #10, #50, #800, #200, #20, #5, #300, #800] / #474 as
[#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as #1883 %
#41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;
4 x #547 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5,
#50, #70, #10] = paralogizomai (G3884): {UMBRA: #28 as #423 % #41 = #13}
1) to reckon wrong, miscount; 2) to cheat by false reckoning; 3) to
deceive, delude, circumvent; 2a) to deceive by false reasoning;
G3884@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 50 (#250); Ego: 30 (#131),
@6: Sup: 39 (#289); Ego: 70 (#201),
@7: Sup: 42 (#331); Ego: 3 (#204),
@8: Sup: 52 (#383); Ego: 10 (#214),
@9: Sup: 59 (#442); Ego: 7 (#221),
@10: Sup: 48 (#490); Ego: 70 (#291),
@11: Sup: 7 (#497); Ego: 40 (#331),
@12: Sup: 12 (#509); Ego: 5 (#336),
@13: Sup: 62 (#571); Ego: 50 (#386),
@14: Sup: 51 (#622); Ego: 70 (#456),
@15: Sup: 61 (#683); Ego: 10 (#466),
Male: #683; Feme: #466
} // #547
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #423 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
"And this I say, lest- any man should beguile {#547 as [#80, #1, #100,
#1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = paralogizomai
(G3884): beguile} you with enticing words." [Colossians 2:4 (KJV)]
"But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving {#547 as
[#80, #1, #100, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10]
= paralogizomai (G3884): beguile} your own selves." [James 1:22 (KJV)]
Having provided an essential blueprint proof of an #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE as the #420 - BINDING THE EARTH TO
THE HEAVENS {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN} DYNAMIC by means of a SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMOUS TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL NOUMENON definition of human sapience
and cognition surely then GROWTH will come to the COMMONWEALTH ECONOMY
from innovation within every faculty of human endeavour and therefore I
must respectfully disagree with this statement: “Even when 5G arrives,
it will be hard to penetrate the smartphone market further. Growth will
come from pricing...” [Al Root, Barrons @ 1243 HOURS ON 23 FEBRUARY 2019]
AL ROOT (DOW JONES) @ 0043 HOURS ON 24 FEBRUARY 2019: “Very interesting.”
DOLF @ 0143 HOURS ON 24 FEBRUARY 2019: “Thank you and here [are] the
object[s] which is the noumenon.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/gizmo.json>
<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/transform-prototypes.json>
With respect to its *CORNERSTONE* contextual history, I refer to
observations of ‘CHURCHES AND FEDERATION’ made by IAN BREWARD from pages
219 to 221 within ‘A HISTORY OF THE CHURCHES IN AUSTRALASIA’ (1991
edition) in relation to individual conscience {ie. #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE
WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)} and the role of religion
in political life associated with the adoption of Section 116 of the
Constitution:
CHURCHES, FEDERATION, REJECTION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC PRECEDENCE ON
SUPERIORITY AND THEIR NON-PARTICIPATION WITHIN THE OFFICIAL COMMONWEALTH
INAUGURATION CEREMONY
“The move to Federation of the Australasian colonies demonstrated the
determination of leaders to reject sectarianism. Some were willing to
create a secular constitution rather than see the possibility of a
persecuting establishment. That led to some vigorous discussion on the
desirability of ‘God’ being mentioned in the proposed constitution.
Some opponents were strong Christians, who saw no need for any formal
relation between religion and politics. Indeed, they argued, with a
considerable amount of historical justification, that the freedom of
churches to carry out their mission came from God, and did not need any
constitutional foundation, apart from the liberty of individual
conscience, and the prohibition of any religious tests for the holding
of public office. Seventh-day Adventists, with American precedents in
mind, were determined that they should not be the victims of Protestant
Sabbatarians who denied them the right to work on Sunday. Some Jews
felt equally strongly, even though the number of Orthodox Jews was not
great.
OTHER PROTESTANT GROUPS, LIKE THE NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES,
WERE NOT ONLY PRESSING FOR THE RECOGNITION OF GOD, BUT ALSO FOR
PARLIAMENT TO BE OPENED WITH PRAYER {
"derivation" : "from G2172 (εὐχή);",
"kjv_def" : "prayer, vow",
"lemma" : "εὐχή",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " properly, a wish, expressed as a petition to God, or
in votive obligation",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a prayer to God",
"@2" : "a vow"
},
"strongs" : "G2171",
"xlit" : "euchḗ",
"umbra" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8],
"1063" : [5, 400, 600, 8, 50]
}
}, AND THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL TO HAVE THE POWER TO CALL DAYS OF NATIONAL
*THANKSGIVING* {
"derivation" : "from G2170 (εὐχαριστία);",
"kjv_def" : "thankfulness, (giving of) thanks(-giving)",
"lemma" : "εὐχαριστία",
"frequency" : 13,
"strongs_def" : " gratitude; actively, grateful language (to God, as an
act of worship)",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "thankfulness",
"@2" : "the giving of thanks"
},
"strongs" : "G2169",
"xlit" : "eucharistía",
"umbra" : {
"1627" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"1626" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 9, 1],
"1627" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1],
"1637" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 10],
"1677" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 50],
"1827" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 1, 200],
"2476" : [5, 400, 600, 1, 100, 10, 200, 300, 10, 800, 50]
}
} *AND* *HUMILIATION*." THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS MANAGED A VERY
EFFECTIVE COUNTER CAMPAIGN. THEY WERE PAINFULLY AWARE THAT WILLIAM AND
HENRY FIRTH HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO THE STOCKS IN PARRAMATTA ON 22 APRIL
1894.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#348 / #213} / HETEROS {#296 / #187} / TORAH {#328
/ #203}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&idea:{m,28}&idea:{f,22}&idea:{m,348}&idea:{f,213}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 1, col: 9, nous: 16 [Date: 2018.4.22, Time: 02:05
hrs, Super: #348 / #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship, Ego: #213 / #16 - Being a Guide,
Returning to the Root; I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great
Exceeding, Preponderance of the great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure]
THEY HAD BEEN PROSECUTED BY THE NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES FOR
WORKING ON SUNDAY.
In addition to their in-house paper, the Bible Echo, they also published
the quarterly Sentinel, and Herald of Liberty, modelled on a similar
journal in the USA. It reached a circulation figure of 4,000 and its
emphases were welcomed by some of the major dailies.
The small Seventh-day Adventist church was able exercise such leverage
because it reaffirmed principles which had already been used by
Baptists, Congregationalists, and some Presbyterians to defeat a dual
system of education. It distributed tracts door-to-door in tens of
thousands and, as a result, won over 22,000 signatures to their petition
against any religious clause or declaration of belief in the
Constitution. Even the Bulletin approved of their common sense, but the
recognition petition still managed to gain more than twice the number of
signatures, as well as some weighty political supporters.
THE FIRST REFERENDUM ON FEDERATION FAILED ON 3 JUNE 1898.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#452 / #404} / HETEROS {#444 / #400} / TORAH {#444
/ #400}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:9,nous:46&idea:{m,86}&idea:{f,133}&idea:{m,452}&idea:{f,404}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 9, nous: 46 [Date: 2018.6.3, Time: 04:50
hrs, Super: #452 / #52 - So What?, Returning to the Origin; I-Ching: H45
- Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together (massing),
Finished; Tetra: 61 - Embellishment, Ego: #404 / #46 - Guiding
Contentment, Moderation of Desire; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 37 - Purity]
CARDINAL MORAN, WHO HAD UNSUCCESSFULLY STOOD FOR THE CONVENTION IN 1896,
CAREFULLY INTERVENED IN THE LATE STAGES OF THE CAMPAIGN PRIOR TO THE
SECOND REFERENDUM, WITH THE RESULT THAT MANY PRIESTS URGED THEIR
PARISHIONERS TO VOTE FOR THE BILL.
In Brisbane, the Revd William Higlett, a Baptist minister, argued that
federation would enhance Australia’s ability to fulfil it missionary
responsibility to the Pacific Islands. The pro vote increased by
36,000, giving the bill a comfortable majority over the almost 83,000
who voted against it.
SIR GEORGE REID, A PREMIER OF NEW SOUTH WALES, HAD ALSO CHANGED SIDES,
AND SOME MODEST CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE BILL, BUT THE CHURCHES WERE
CLEARLY INFLUENTIAL. BOTH MORAN AND THE ANGLICAN ARCHBISHOP, SAUMAREZ
SMITH, WERE IN FAVOUR {
"derivation" : "from G2095 (εὔχρηστος) and G5543 (εὔχρηστος);",
"kjv_def" : "profitable, meet for use",
"lemma" : "εὔχρηστος",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " easily used, i.e. useful",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "easy to make use of, useful"
},
"strongs" : "G2173",
"xlit" : "eúchrēstos",
"umbra" : {
"1883" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 200]
}, "gematria" : {
"1733" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 50],
"1883" : [5, 400, 600, 100, 8, 200, 300, 70, 200]
}
} OF SECTION 116 OF THE CONSTITUTION, WHICH PREVENTED SABBATARIAN
LEGISLATION, AND ENSURED THAT THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL COULD NOT PROCLAIM
DAYS OF HUMILIATION AND *THANKSGIVING*. THE ISSUE OF PRAYERS {
"derivation" : "from G2172 (εὐχή);",
"kjv_def" : "prayer, vow",
"lemma" : "εὐχή",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : " properly, a wish, expressed as a petition to God, or
in votive obligation",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "a prayer to God",
"@2" : "a vow"
},
"strongs" : "G2171",
"xlit" : "euchḗ",
"umbra" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"1013" : [5, 400, 600, 8],
"1063" : [5, 400, 600, 8, 50]
}
} IN PARLIAMENT, AND QUESTIONS OF ECCLESIASTICAL PRECEDENCE {
"derivation" : "from G756 (ἀρχή);",
"kjv_def" : "beginning, *CORNER*, (at the, the) first (estate),
magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule",
"lemma" : "ἀρχή",
"frequency" : 57,
"strongs_def" : " (properly abstract) a commencement, or (*CONCRETELY*)
chief (in various applications of order, time, place, or rank)",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "beginning, origin",
"@2" : "the person or thing that commences, the first person or thing
in a series, the leader",
"@3" : "that by which anything begins to be, the origin, the active
cause",
"@4" : "the extremity of a thing",
"@4a" : "of the corners of a sail",
"@5" : "the first place, principality, rule, magistracy",
"@5a" : "of angels and demons"
},
"strongs" : "G746",
"xlit" : "archḗ",
"umbra" : {
"709" : [1, 100, 600, 8]
},
"gematria" : {
"709" : [1, 100, 600, 8],
"712" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 10],
"719" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 10],
"759" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 50],
"902" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 200],
"909" : [1, 100, 600, 8, 200],
"912" : [1, 100, 600, 1, 10, 200]
}
},
{
"derivation" : "from G1832 (ἐξουσία) (in the sense of ability);",
"kjv_def" : "authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength",
"lemma" : "ἐξουσία",
"frequency" : 110,
"strongs_def" : " privilege, i.e. (subjectively) force, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) mastery (concretely, magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, token of control), delegated influence",
"outline" : {
"@1" : "power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases",
"@1a" : "leave or permission",
"@2" : "physical and mental power",
"@2a" : "the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he
either possesses or exercises",
"@3" : "the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)",
"@4" : "the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will
and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)",
"@4a" : "universally",
"@4a1" : "authority over mankind",
"@4b" : "specifically",
"@4b1" : "the power of judicial decisions",
"@4b2" : "of authority to manage domestic affairs",
"@4c" : "metonymically",
"@4c1" : "a thing subject to authority or rule",
"@4c1i" : "jurisdiction",
"@4c2" : "one who possesses authority",
"@4c2i" : "a ruler, a human magistrate",
"@4c2ii" : "the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates",
"@4c3" : "a sign of the husband's authority over his wife",
"@4c3i" : "the veil with which propriety required a women to cover
herself",
"@4c4" : "the sign of regal authority, a crown"
},
"strongs" : "G1849",
"xlit" : "exousía",
"umbra" : {
"746" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"745" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 9, 1],
"746" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1],
"756" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 10],
"796" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 50],
"946" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 200],
"956" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 1, 10, 200],
"1595" : [5, 60, 70, 400, 200, 10, 800, 50]
}
}, CAUSED SOME DISCUSSION, BUT THE LATTER WAS A PREROGATIVE MATTER.
NEVERTHELESS, IT CAUSED CONSIDERABLE TENSION, BECAUSE OF THE SYMBOLIC
IMPORTANCE OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED.
*MORAN* *REFUSED* *TO* *SHARE* *IN* *THE* *OFFICIAL* *INAUGURATION*
*CEREMONY* *WHEN* *HIS* *CLAIM* *TO* *PRECEDENCE* *ON* *SENIORITY* *WAS*
*REJECTED*. SMITH READ THE PRAYER ON 1 JANUARY.
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#329 / #329} / HETEROS {#354 / #382} / TORAH {#354
/ #382}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:8,col:3,nous:48&idea:{m,48}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,329}&idea:{f,329}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.1.1, Time: 18:40
hrs, Super: #329 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering,
Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance]
PRESBYTERIANS ALSO HAD SOME CLAIM TO PRECEDENCE BECAUSE OF LINKS WITH
THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND, BUT FAILING THAT THEY ARGUED FOR EQUALITY. AT
THE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT, LORD HOPETOUN READ A PRAYER, WHICH CREATED AN
IMPORTANT PRECEDENT. W. Knox and J.T. Walker moved, in each house, that
prayer begin each session.
They had support from all major church leaders in Victoria, and though
some argued that this would break Section 116 of the Commonwealth’s
Constitution, the majority agreed that a standing order was not a law.
But the prayer was theist rather than Christian, showing, yet again,
that lay Christianity was non-sectarian and not interested in issues of
dogma. The prayer was read by the Speaker. There has never been a
chaplain to either house, unlike the practice in the US Congress. Only
a New Zealand delegate asked about the constitutional position of the
Aborigines, who were completely ignored in the final drafts.”
A PUBLIC RELEASE (CENSORED) VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE HERE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%203%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
TO BE CONTINUED ...
Initial Post: 10 December 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
