-- OH BOUDICA REGINA HERO THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE: ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF
NERO FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 January, 2019
For our next update to the GRAPPLE prototype we have to give some
consideration on how to resolve the perennial problem of SOCIAL MEDIA
conquest defined as the:
PRO DOMO {ie. FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE OF IDENTITY}
SUI JURIS AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {eg: IGNORANCE}
MEMBRUM VIRILE AS #120 / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"
http://youtu.be/YFGHEZMSek4
Dynamic within the context of the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE quest {#312
- ATTRIBUTE DIFFERENTIALS / #288 - IDEALISATIONS} for sexual opportunism:
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPES
OF THE PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}
#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 24 (#32); Ego: 16 (#24),
@3: Sup: 48 (#80); Ego: 24 (#48),
@4: Sup: 80 (#160); Ego: 32 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 6 (#205); Ego: 48 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@7: Sup: 62 (#267); Ego: 56 (#224),
@8: Sup: 45 (#312 - CONTRADICTION BY *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS*);
Ego: 64 (#288 - *MEMORIAL*, *REMINDER*, *REMEMBRANCE* COMMON WITH ADOLF
HITLER'S USAGE),
@9: Sup: 36 (#348); Ego: 72 (#360),
Male: #348; Feme: #360
}
I've just watched the latest SBS TV episode of "Pope: The Most Powerful
Man In History" and I have to say with respects to COMMUNISM as being
entirely a semantical political construct by dialectics of #312 -
CONTRADICTION that is distinct from the repulsive machinations of
FASCISM / CATHOLICISM {ie. as competatively #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
/ #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AGAINST THE BIOLOGICAL ORDER} whereby
they are facilitators within the process of REASON:
#364
#312
#273
As no less than the FRENCH by their societal revolution of 1789.
So how are we going to achieve this?
That the PRO DOMO, SUI JURIS, MEMBRUM VIRILE might be considered in
terms of a LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM:
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will:
In the consideration of a #72 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROTOTYPE this might be
thought of as the default birth DAEMON or any IMPETUS as CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING (ie. #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE*):
The #1 - seraphim, #2 - cherubim, #3 - thrones, #4 - dominions, #5 -
virtues, #6 - powers,#7 - principalities, #8 - arch-angel, #9 - angel
prime directive which is the default disposition
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law:
This might be a consideration of the #231 - JUXTAPOSITION prototype
directive from #73 to #81 as CONTROL (ie. #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*)
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand:
This might be a consideration of the ONTIC syncretism {ie. #205 / #164:
#364 ... #312 ... #273 dialectics} process which in metaphysical terms
is the cohesion that occurs before there is a streaming of consciousness
within the instantiation of temporality.
So we may need to define a totally new grappleIDEA which is capable as
perhaps a composite of the GIZMO array populated with relevant ONTIC and
TEMPORAL DIALECTIC CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:
{nous: #nn, z: n, x: n, y: n, directive: #nnn, category: #nnn, type: (m
| f)}
which will then act as WATCHERS / RECEIVERS in conveying such a
composite notion so that we can explore by analytic judgements such a
notion as GNOSIS EX MACHINA.
We shall not be able to address this issue in any material manner of
javascript prototyping until we have *COMPLETED* our court submission by
26 JANUARY 2019 that is titled:
"SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY COURT
APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S
INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A
FOREIGN POWER"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>
Yet egotistically, SOCIAL MEDIA often ALSO claims as its integral view,
the resorting to a process as disenfranchising of the essence and soul
of the human dignity itself as the value of the person being the other
by its habituated pervasive carelessness as a culture of disrespect
which is always a quantification as:
#1 - A DEGREE OF AVARICIOUS WANT;
#2 - THE POTENTIAL OF LIMITATIONS UPON REALITY;
#3 - A CAPABILITY TO BEGUILE AND STUPEFY WITH WORDS, THE QUARRY SOUGHT
AS THE OBJECT OF VIRILE NECESSITY;
#4 - VARIANCE OF ACCEPTABILITY AS THE CAUSE FOR IMPROBABILITY;
#5 - THE PERMISSIBILITY OF IDEALISATIONS;
#6 - THE ORGANISATIONAL READINESS TO ELIMINATE ANY INHIBITORS TO THE
PHYSICAL DYNAMICS OF OPPORTUNITY;
#7 - TO FACILITATE A SPORTING PROWESS OF A PROUD ACCOMPLISHMENT IN A
MUTUALLY SATISFYING PURPOSED DELIVERY; AND
#8 - A JOB WELL DONE, ALWAYS WANTS MORE.
I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed as
long ago as 12 FEBRUARY 2017 but not exhaustively made of the sexual
act. Been accused of over intellectualising how people engage their
wants within this physical act.
Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a ***@CK
YOU and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.
Now that SAME SEX MARRIAGE has been adopted within LEGISLATION, how
effectively and strategically the GLBTQI COMMUNITY engages within this
process can do more to effectively control and eliminate neo-nazism and
religious extremism than 17 years of the Afghanistan or Iraqi Wars could
ever do.
With the continuing rise of neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry
this nation especially needs you to be mindful of the effect that the
sexual opportunities you make can win that war.
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on
initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a
deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a
later state.
YOUTUBE: "The Butterfly Effect | This Video Will Change Your Life |
Documentary"
http://youtu.be/G2xFJUSLEv8
Sadly such ignorance of individual #391 - HOMOGENEOUS accountability in
safe guarding any PRO DOMO entitlement without diminishing another
party's SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE human rights / constitutional
protections within sexual opportunism amongst GRINDR users is especially
deprecated to the extent that its culpability and deprivation within the
community is worse than any socially communicable disease of living memory.
So within the coming weeks we're going to give some consideration to
expanding the GRAPPLE prototype with PRO DOMO / SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE notions as methodology functions.
Thus in terms of any cognitive processes (ie. as then the foundational
basis for probability theory as determinism of occurrence} what I desire
to observe is the process of intuition as the osmosis intersections
which occur within the neurological predisposition as nuanced syllogism
(ie. we need to still develop adequate semantics of nomenclature which
agreeably convey this).
So for example if I wanted to determine the reality of the notion: “this
is a test” as a criteria of existentiality, this would then require a
resolution of the criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as:
#61 / #122 against the default neurological and personalistic disposition:
[this, {@1: Sup: 49 (#49); Ego: 74 (#74)},
is, {@2: Sup: 5 (#54); Ego: 28 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})},
a, {@3: Sup: 6 (#60); Ego: 1 (#103)},
test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)}
#49 + #54 + #60 + #61 = #224 - *TO* *BRING* *FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO* *SHOW*
#74 + #102 + #103 + #122 = #401 - *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;
G1925@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
@4: Sup: 13 (#31); Ego: 4 (#94),
@5: Sup: 18 (#49); Ego: 5 (#99 as [#3, #30, #10, #6, #700] =
gillayown (H1549): {UMBRA: #61 as #99 % #41 = #17} 1) table, tablet,
mirror, flat shiny ornament),
@6: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 10 (#109),
@7: Sup: 7 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#169 -
I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
@8: Sup: 12 (#96); Ego: 5 (#174),
@9: Sup: 62 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 50 (#224),
Male: #158; Feme: #224
} // #224
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #224 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#224 as [#5, #80, #5, #4, #5, #10, #60, #5, #50] = epideiknumi (G1925):
{UMBRA: #57 as #224 % #41 = #19} 1) to exhibit, show; 1a) *TO* *BRING*
*FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO* *SHOW*; 1a1) furnish to be looked at, produce
what may looked at; 1a2) to display something belonging to one's self;
1b) to prove, demonstrate, set forth to be known and acknowledged;
#401 as #1, #400 = Self; #1, #400 = At; by; with; toward; the particle
of directed emphasis: THIS! (first and last Hebrew letters, like Alpha
and Omega); #40, #70, #90, #200 = *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;
So in order to do so we might need an interim pulse() function by which
we can then approximate thinking as the actuation of any dialectic set
{eg: #364, #312, #273, #237 - STUBBORN WILL} process and its enquiry
before arriving at any final disposition of intersections being then the
composition of knowing and its presentation.
G991@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 32 (#34); Ego: 30 (#32),
@3: Sup: 37 (#71); Ego: 5 (#37),
@4: Sup: 36 (#107); Ego: 80 (#117),
@5: Sup: 41 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 5 (#122),
Male: #148; Feme: #122
} // #122
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #122 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; I have no unjust preferences.
#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite strenuous
efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228
@memeBrain SYNCRETISM:
test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)},
Thus within this instance of “this is a test” the condition of criteria:
#40, #80, #27, #81 is met within the #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*
#122 as [#2, #30, #5, #80, #5] = blepo (G991): {UMBRA: #93 as #122 % #41
= #40} 1) to see, discern, of the bodily eye; 2) metaphor: to see with
the mind's eye; 3) in a geographical sense of places, mountains,
buildings, etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were, facing it; 1a)
with the bodily eye: to be possessed of sight, have the power of seeing;
1b) perceive by the use of the eyes: to see, look descry; 1c) to turn
the eyes to anything: to look at, look upon, gaze at; 1d) to perceive by
the senses, to feel; 1e) to discover by use, to know by experience; 2a)
to have (the power of) understanding; 2b) to discern mentally, observe,
perceive,
discover, understand; 2c) to turn the thoughts or direct the mind to a
thing, to consider, contemplate, to look at, to weigh carefully, examine;
THIS COGNITIVE FUNCTION HAS NEVER BEFORE BEEN CONCEIVED IN TERMS OF AN
INTUITIVE COMPUTING FUNCTION() but we want to explore it none the less
so as to determine whether it is a viable means in describing the human
sapient paradigm of existence and reality—we may be wrong but it is not
improper to advance a proposition as then an avenue of self discovery.
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION)
IDEA: @B159 THIRD SECTION: OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION OF ALL SYNTHETIC PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
That principles occur anywhere at all is due solely to the pure
understanding, which is not only the faculty of rules with respect to
that which [IDEA: @B198] happens, but is itself the source of the
principles in accordance with which [IDEA: @A159] everything (that can
come forward to us only as object) necessarily falls under rules, since
without such rules the appearances could never amount to cognition of an
object corresponding to them. Even the #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE /
12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE
OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {ie. #2184 ipso facto 6 x #364 - OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as
[#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*}, 7 x #312 -
AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}, 7 x #273 - ASSISTING / DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)
{#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1) *WEAK*;
*INCAPACITY*} UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS
UNDER SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT} that we can know
only through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of
appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.
OBEDIENT(H7522)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 46 (#60); Ego: 38 (#46),
@4: Sup: 55 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 9 (#55),
@5: Sup: 61 (#176); Ego: 6 (#61),
@6: Sup: 30 (#206); Ego: 50 (#111),
@7: Sup: 40 (#246); Ego: 10 (#121),
Male: #246; Feme: #121
}
H7522@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 77 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 9 (#77),
@4: Sup: 46 (#221); Ego: 50 (#127),
@5: Sup: 66 (#287); Ego: 20 (#147),
@6: Sup: 25 (#312); Ego: 40 (#187),
Male: #312; Feme: #187
} // #430
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra: 49 - Flight;
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; *I*
*TROUBLE* *MYSELF* *ONLY* *WITH* *MY* *OWN* *AFFAIRS*.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
#POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
#TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
#CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 (#18); Ego: 18 (#18),
@2: Sup: 76 (#94); Ego: 58 (#76),
@3: Sup: 16 (#110); Ego: 21 (#97),
@4: Sup: 7 (#117); Ego: 72 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169 {#273 as [#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1)
*REMEMBRANCE*}
#364 as [#6, #2, #200, #90, #6, #50, #10] / #430 as [#30, #200, #90,
#50, #20, #40] = ratsown (H7522): {UMBRA: #14 as #346 % #41 = #18} 1)
pleasure, delight, favour, goodwill, acceptance, will; 1a) goodwill,
favour; 1b) acceptance; 1c) will, desire, pleasure, self-will;
AIDING(H5826)@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
@4: Sup: 31 (#120); Ego: 7 (#112),
@5: Sup: 69 (#189); Ego: 38 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #189; Feme: #150
}
H5826@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#105); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 38 (#155),
@5: Sup: 3 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 10 (#165),
@6: Sup: 43 (#225); Ego: 40 (#205),
Male: #225; Feme: #205
} // #367
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186 {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}
#312 as [#30, #5, #70, #7, #200] / #367 as [#40, #70, #7, #200, #10,
#40] = âzar (H5826): {UMBRA: #4 as #277 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *HELP*,
*SUCCOUR*, *SUPPORT*; 1a) (Qal) to help; 1b) (Niphal) to be helped; 1c)
(Hiphil) to help;
DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
Male: #191; Feme: #111
}
H5144@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #279
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #257 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166 {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1)
*WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
#273 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200] / #279 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200, #6]
= nazar (H5144): {UMBRA: #4 as #257 % #41 = #11} 1) to dedicate,
consecrate, separate; 2) (Hiphil) to be a Nazarite, live as a Nazarite;
1a) (Niphal) to dedicate oneself, devote oneself; 1b) (Hiphil) to keep
sacredly separate; 2) *SOVEREIGN*; *ONE* *CHOSEN* *OR* *SET* *APART*;
*SEPARATED*; *CROWNED*; SANCTIFIED;
MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."
MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.
...
MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
from Mr
MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].
His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.
MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
planet.
Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
C-squared:
Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]
That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
that is used in...
HYPOTEÍNOUSA (verb):
- to hypothesise by ratiocination within measured bounds of division
without an incommensurate bias.
(noun):
- [GEOMETRY]: the side of a right triangle opposite the right angle.
- Also: hypothenuse.
ETYMOLOGY:
The word hypotenuse comes from Late Latin hypotēnūsa, a transliteration
of Ancient Greek ὑποτείνουσα [πλευρά] (hypoteínousa [pleurá]), meaning
"[side] subtending [the right angle]". The word was used for the
hypotenuse of a triangle c. 360 BCE by Plato in the Timaeus (dialogue)
54d and by many other ancient authors.
#1586 as [#400, #80, #70, #300, #5, #10, #50, #70, #400, #200, #1] as
'You Need Me Day And Night Gematria'
HYPOTENUSE@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
@2: Sup: 75 (#151); Ego: 80 (#156),
@3: Sup: 64 (#215); Ego: 70 (#226),
@4: Sup: 40 (#255); Ego: 57 (#283),
@5: Sup: 45 (#300); Ego: 5 (#288 - *UMBRA*), <-- *MAPPED* *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND TORAH PROTOTYPE #THREE: #96 / #288
@6: Sup: 55 (#355); Ego: 10 (#298),
@7: Sup: 24 (#379); Ego: 50 (#348),
@8: Sup: 13 (#392); Ego: 70 (#418),
@9: Sup: 8 (#400 - *TAU*); Ego: 76 (#494),
@10: Sup: 46 (#446); Ego: 38 (#532),
@11: Sup: 47 (#493); Ego: 1 (#533),
Male: #493; Feme: #533
} // #1586 <-- *UNITED* *NATIONS* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS* *COUNCIL*
A folk etymology incorrectly claims that tenuse means "side" and
hypotenuse means a support like a prop or buttress
ORIGIN: 1565–75; earlier hypotenusa < Latin hypotēnūsa < Greek
hypoteínousa (grámmē) subtending (line) (feminine present participle of
hypoteínein to subtend), equivalent to hypo- hypo- + tein- stretch (see
thin) + -ousa feminine present participle suffix
Within geometry, a hypotenuse (rarely: hypothenuse) is the longest side
of a right-angled triangle, the side opposite of the right angle. The
length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be found using the
Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the
hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two
sides. For example, if one of the other sides has a length of 3 (when
squared, 9) and the other has a length of 4 (when squared, 16), then
their squares add up to 25. The length of the hypotenuse is the square
root of 25, that is, 5.
PHILOSOPHICAL USE:
Whereas *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) is analogous to the English concepts of
being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated
as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to English as substance and
essence.
Aristotle defined protai ousiai (πρῶται οὐσίαι), "primary substances",
in the Categories as that which is neither said of nor in any subject,
eg., "this human" in particular, or "this ox". The genera in biology and
other natural kinds are substances in a secondary sense, as universals,
formally defined by the essential qualities of the primary substances;
i.e., the individual members of those kinds.
Much later, Martin Heidegger said that the original meaning of the word
*OUSIA* was lost in its translation to the Latin, and, subsequently, in
its translation to modern languages. For him, *OUSIA* means Being, not
substance, that is, not some thing or some being that "stood" (-stance)
"under" (sub-). Moreover, he also uses the binomial parousia–apousia,
denoting presence–absence, and [relativity within the] *HYPOSTASIS*
denoting existence.
THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The word *OUSIA* is not used in the New Testament except in relation to
the substance in the sense of goods twice in the parable of the Prodigal
Son where the son asked his father to divide to him his inheritance, and
then wasted it on riotous living.
An apparently related word, epiousios (affixing the prefix epi- to the
word), is used in the Lord's Prayer, but nowhere else in the scriptures.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ousia>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion and 147,000,000+ kilometers for perihelion:
Gothika (vector image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY
SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons @
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]
YOUTUBE: "Wake Me Up (Avicii [Tim Bergling RIP: 20 April 2018])"
http://youtu.be/yVjjuOqMQIw
The commentary which was published within 4 BCE on the Tetragram #16 -
CONTACT given by the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T’AI HSUAN CHING) as
meta-descriptor (ie. outside time) prototypes which formed the non
encapsulated as artifice basis of the Chinese DAOist (206 BCE to 220 CE)
Empirical governance which had its Grand Inception on the midnight new
moon of the solstice on 21 December 103 BCE (and which continues to this
day), it specifically states: “*THE* *WISE* *PERSON* (ie. HOMO [iOS]
SAPIEN [T]) *AVOIDS* *CONTACT* *WITH* *LESSER*, *BESTIAL* *MEN* {
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>
[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:
1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]
As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.
2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]
} *LEST* *HE* *BE* *INFLUENCED *FOR* *THE* *WORSE*:
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/MALI_ART.jpeg>
[IMAGE: MALI ART OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD]
MALEFICENT (adjective): literary causing harm or destruction, especially
by supernatural means. - Astrology relating to the planets Saturn (#15)
and Mars (#65), traditionally considered to have an unfavourable influence.
MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act
that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing
used especially of an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the
Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
However this MALFEASANCE is unlawful conduct by a public authority such
as the Victoria Police or the Returned Services League (RSL) under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: “(1) Subject to this section, *IT*
*IS* *UNLAWFUL* *FOR* *A* *PUBLIC* *AUTHORITY* *TO* *ACT* *IN* *A* *WAY*
*THAT* *IS* *INCOMPATIBLE* *WITH* *A* *HUMAN* *RIGHT* *OR*, *IN*
*MAKING* *A* *DECISION*, *TO* *FAIL* *TO* *GIVE* *PROPER*
*CONSIDERATION* *TO* *A* *RELEVANT* *HUMAN* *RIGHT*.
MR RIDDELL: Madam, could I object?
...
MR RIDDELL: I am not sure that the intention is entirely relevant. It is
the manner in which I reasonably interpreted those phone messages. There
is a transcript before the court. I was threatened. Mr Boek, by his
conduct today and in the past, on any objective view appears to be
unstable. I think it is inappropriate that this matter be continued.
Peter Riddell on January 2013 published this perspective:
TITLE: "The Illegality Defence: Has your insured been misbehaving?"
Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing life and disability
claims may have cause to consider an insured's unlawful conduct and
whether grounds arise to decline a claim on the basis of the illegality
defence. There are a number of aspects to the illegality defence. This
paper reviews the impact of public policy on claims for indemnity
arising out of unlawful conduct on the part of insureds.
WHO DOES THIS IMPACT?
Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing disability insurance
claims.
WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN?
Unlawful conduct by an insured may allow an insurer to deny liability
for an insurance claim on the grounds that it would be against public
policy to allow an insured to receive a benefit under the policy.
As the application of public policy often involves making difficult
value judgments, each case will depend upon its own particular
circumstances. As such, you may first wish to seek advice as to what
action to take having regard to the facts of your particular claim.
ILLEGALITY AND PUBLIC POLICY
It is well established that a claim that arises out of a loss caused
directly in the commission of a felony or similarly serious criminal
offence by an insured can be denied on the ground that to pay the claim
would be contrary to public policy. This is based on the principle that
no person should benefit from their crime or wrongdoing ("the public
policy principle").
A PDF COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT AUTHORED BY MR. PETER RIDDELL AND TITLED
"TURKALERT: The Illegality Defence: Has your insured been misbehaving?"
IS AVAILABLE FROM THIS URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Illegality-Defence.pdf>
AS THEY CLAIM TO HONOURABLY SWEAR BY OATH [AS DIEU ET MON DROIT] (BUT HE
ONLY BY A WEAK AFFIRMATION)."
There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Templar%20Saint%20Andrews.JPG>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Knights%20Mantra.jpg>
[IMAGES: THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
CÉLÈBRE HAS A SUBSTITUTED ETHOS AS MANTRA BEING AN EULOGY TO THE #419 -
*SLAUGHTER*: "FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS"]
THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons
whom paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A
CONTEMPT BY MALFEASANCE AS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE
1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE
STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA
/ ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 -
*TO* *PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME* AS #444 - *SPORT* / *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391
REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}
V'S
PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 +
#390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341
% #41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN
ABHORRENT RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE
AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling
together; 1a) convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;
#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365
% #41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 % #41 = #13 AS DATA MANIPULATION TO *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF*
*A* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #12 as
#460 % #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling;
1b) like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#541 as [#5, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #10] = `abad (H5647): {UMBRA: #42
as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to work, serve; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to labour, work,
do work; 1a2) to work for another, serve another by labour; 1a3) to
serve as subjects; 1a4) to serve (God); 1a5) to serve (with Levitical
service); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be worked, be tilled (of land); 1b2) to
make oneself a servant; 1c) (Pual) to be worked; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
compel to labour or work, cause to labour, cause to serve; 1d2) to cause
to serve as subjects; 1e) (Hophal) to be led or enticed to serve;
#541 as [#50, #1, #90, #400] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #31 as #541 % #41
= #8} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn, contemn;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c) (Hiphil) to
spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) to be contemned;
#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{UMBRA: #60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2)
metaph. to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a)
to inflict mortal death; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and procure
eternal misery in hell;
It also provides understanding of the underlying methodology as the
precedent PRO DOMO IDEA (12 MAY 1942) @215 / @235 (7 JUNE 1942) assigned
to ADOLF HITLER’S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK depiction as the shooting of
one hundred and thirty bible students whom were indicted by the highest
military court of the Wehrmacht charged with demoralization of the armed
forces.
THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN
VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM
from #1827 - OPPRESSION is:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict
against nature itself."
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 +
#390 + #390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM*
*THE* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, *WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE*." [page 70]
SECTION VI: "And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Act 1900,' {#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}} it is amongst
other things enacted, that we may authorise the GOVERNOR GENERAL to
APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his DEPUTY OR
DEPUTIES: {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 14 = #156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}} within any part of
Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the pleasure
of the GOVERNOR GENERAL such POWERS, and FUNCTIONS of the said GOVERNOR
GENERAL as he thinks fit to assign to such DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, subject
to any #168 - *LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any
person or persons, jointly or severally. To be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES
within any part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that
capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such of his POWERS and
FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or
them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such a DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES
shall not affect the exercise by the GOVERNOR GENERAL himself of any
POWER or FUNCTION."
SECTION VII: "And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, #273 - INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said
GOVERNOR GENERAL out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE
POWERS AND AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further
pleasure is signified therein, be vested in such person as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR of Our said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR in Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or
persons as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to
administer the Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES
SHALL VEST in such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, or such other person or persons,
UNTIL HE OR THEY SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE #108 - *OATHS* *APPOINTED* {
"They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse,
and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the
servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD
our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes {#108 as [#8, #100] = choq
(H2706): statute};" [Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV)]
} to be taken by the GOVERNOR GENERAL of Our said Commonwealth, and in
the manner provided by the Instructions accompanying these Our Letters
Patent."
ASSOCIATED TO THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}:
H5157@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 68 (#138); Ego: 8 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 17 (#155); Ego: 30 (#98),
@5: Sup: 23 (#178); Ego: 6 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #178; Feme: #104
} // #104
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#104 as [#10, #50, #8, #30, #6] = nachal (H5157): {UMBRA: #16 as #104 %
#41 = #22} 1) to get as a possession, acquire, inherit, possess; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to take possession, inherit; 1a2) to have or get as a
possession or property (fig.); 1a3) to divide the land for a possession;
1a4) to acquire (testimonies) (fig.); 1b) (Piel) to divide for a
possession; 1c) (Hithpael) to possess oneself of; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
give as a possession; 1d2) to cause to inherit, give as an inheritance;
1e) (Hophal) to be allotted, be made to possess;
SECTION IX: “And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our #104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER,
OR AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
If they are considered as fundamental laws of the empirical use of the
understanding, at the same time carry with them an expression of
necessity, hence at least the presumption of being determined from
grounds that are valid a priori and before all experience. But all #2184
- *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, without distinction, fall under higher
principles of the understanding, since they merely apply such principles
to particular cases of appearance.
... The table of categories provides us with completely natural
instructions [IDEA: @A161 / @B200] for the table of principles, since
these principles are indeed nothing other than rules for the objective
use of the categories." [pages 180 - 181]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION)
IDEA: @B252 SECOND ANALOGY: PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO
THE LAW OF CAUSALITY
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the
imagination that determines the inner sense with respect to relation in
time. The imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states
in two different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in
time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in
so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a house that stands before me is successive. Now the
question is: whether the manifold of this house itself also is
successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself, but [IDEA:
@B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose transcendental
object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I understand by the
question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the appearance itself
(which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in the successive
apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the appearance that
is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of
such representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
house, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others.
But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I
call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then
B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception a cannot
follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
[IDEA: @B238] the top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T ***@CK YOUR COUNTRY WITH
#325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE) PLAY YOUR PART FOR THE COUNTRY
AND DON'T LET neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry BECOME AN
UNSTOPPABLE PLAGUE
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/uncle-sam-wants-you.png>
WHAT HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?
YOUTUBE: “In the Navy (Village People)”
http://youtu.be/InBXu-iY7cw
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0924 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "You will write a couple of hundred lines of gobbledygook, as usual."
DOLF @ 1117 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "NO I'M ACTUALLY GIVING A VALID
EXPLANATION WHICH CONVEYS PRINCIPLES OF Existential phenomenology that
exceeds Martin Heidegger's brand of phenomenology:
Wanting to determine the reality of the notion: 'this is a test' as a
criteria of existentiality, this would then require a resolution of the
criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as: #61 / #122 against
the default neurological and personalistic disposition:
THUS I CONVEY THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE as an INTUITION of the
ONTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE in being DEPENDENT upon ONTIC necessity expressed by:
#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*
#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*
And its CRITERIA of either #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST / #237 -
IMMUTABLE WILL is itself an outcome of a DIALECTIC SYNCRETIC
META-PHYSICAL PROCESS:
#364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETISM
Which although outside time or preceding instantiation within TIME as an
IDEA:
[I, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
D, {@2: Sup: 13 (#22); Ego: 4 (#13)},
E, {@3: Sup: 18 (#40); Ego: 5 (#18)},
A] {@4: Sup: 19 (#59); Ego: 1 (#19)},
Nevertheless conforms {#9 + #22 + #40 + #59 = #130 - I AM NOT EVIL
MINDED {%3}} to the ANTHROPOCENTRIC characteristic of TIME.
H3117@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 40 (#80),
@4: Sup: 9 (#159); Ego: 10 (#90),
@5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 33 (#123),
Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #130
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #130 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance;
I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest
thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
#VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
#TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
#POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
#TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
#CANON: #104
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 54 (#61); Ego: 47 (#54),
@3: Sup: 66 (#127); Ego: 12 (#66),
@4: Sup: 23 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104
#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): {UMBRA: #2 as #130 %
#41 = #7} 1) day, time, year; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24
hour period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2)
as a division of time; 1b2a) a working day, a day's journey; 1c) days,
lifetime (pl.); 1d) time, period (general); 1e) year; 1f) temporal
references; 1f1) today; 1f2) yesterday; 1f3) tomorrow;
"And God called the light Day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the
morning were the first day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:5 (KJV)]
"And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning
were the second day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117):
day}." [Genesis 1:8 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the third day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:13 (KJV)]
"And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to
divide the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}
from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days
{#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and years:"
[Genesis 1:14 (KJV)]
"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day {#130
as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and the lesser light
to rule the night: he made the stars also." [Genesis 1:16 (KJV)]
"And to rule over the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day} and over the night, and to divide the light from the
darkness: and God saw that it was good." [Genesis 1:18 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the fourth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:19 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the fifth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:23 (KJV)]
In contrast with his former mentor Edmund Husserl, Heidegger (in his
Being and Time) put ontology before epistemology and thought that
phenomenology would have to be based on an observation and analysis of
Dasein ("being-there"), human being, investigating the fundamental
ontology of the Lebenswelt (lifeworld, Husserl's term) underlying all
so-called regional ontologies of the special sciences. In Heidegger's
philosophy, people are thrown into the world in a given situation, but
they are also a project towards the future, possibility, freedom, wait,
hope, anguish. In contrast with the philosopher Kierkegaard, Heidegger
wanted to explore the problem of Dasein existentially (existenzial),
rather than existentielly (existenziell) because Heidegger argued
Kierkegaard had already described the latter with "penetrating fashion".
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Existential_phenomenology>]
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1349 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "And... you wrote gobbledygook instead."
DOLF @ 1413 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "You are such an imbecile that you
cannot even recognise technical brilliance in explaining why the
biblical narrative of Genesis (1550 BCE) similarly utilises temporal
designations before time itself existed."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1537 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "I recognise that there is no evidence that the bible is, in any
useful way, true."
DOLF @ 1615 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "There is no #492 - REASONING {ie.
RATIONAL PI - 22 HEBREW LETTERS / 7 DAYS} with you is there as your #41
- INNATE prejudice and lack of education is just #451 - ABYSMAL
51 25 74
73 50 27
26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
*KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
[+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}
49 9 65 - *SOLDIER*
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
#YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
#MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
then allows for stages of development.
THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS {ie. DAO-ziran /
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis: #1, #21, #41, #61, #81 / BIRTHDAY
CELEBRATION-genesia} BIBLICAL TEXT RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC
PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOGENEOUS #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}
#11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
spread of Light and industry by Government and Non-Government
Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature
That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
#2184 % #41 = #11
Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
art within a similar manner.
YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
http://youtu.be/qyUxxgwHK8Q
ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
In modern Israeli orthography, vowel and consonant pointing is seldom
used, except in specialised texts such as dictionaries, poetry, or texts
for children or for new immigrants. *LIKE* *ENGLISH* Israeli Hebrew has
five vowel phonemes—/i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ and /u/—but many more written
symbols for them.
What are you doing for AUSTRALIA DAY?"
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1808 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "Babble. Just babble. Try writing in English, ya crazy bastard."
DOLF @ 1824 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "Sorry I don't speak *GOIDELIC*
*HILLBILLY*."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1829 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "I asked you to speak English. You've heard of English, right?
You probably went to school. You seem to be fairly intelligent. Write in
English."
DOLF @ 1833 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "What else of #873 - PROBITY and
#644 - DECORUM accorded to DIGNITY ROYAL would you like to talk about?"
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0643 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY
2019: "On Australia Day (I don't understand why you have to capitalise
words like that.
It's bizarre), I'll be doing the same as usual. Walk the *DOGS* for an
hour. Stay home for the rest of the day.
Why do ask Two *DOGS*?"
DOLF @ 0700 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "I haven't seen your pooper-scooper
mongrel mate LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM)
of late--A thunderous storm is coming and it's off cowering somewhere.
YOUTUBE: "Thunder (Imagine Dragons)"
http://youtu.be/fKopy74weus
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1625 HOURS
ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "Sorry, guess that was my fault for spending a bit of
time at the coast, a bit of time hiking, and a bit of time at the river.
I guess when I go to Tamworth in 12 days Dolf will miss me even more."
DOLF @ 0700 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "And as for AUSTRALIA DAY and the
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *YOUR* *JINGOISTIC* *SOLDIER* *PANTOMIME* which is a
parallax within the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE (ie. #65 - *SOLDIER*) as
historical perspective commonly deployed by ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as
the exemplar mapping to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months
(for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing,
The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE) against #49 - T'AO {Flight} /
H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are
LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is
PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO
CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/tetrayear.jpeg>
[IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to
EIGHT major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days
of NATURAL YEAR / 325.25 days)
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*
#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161
Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
move back and forth around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier
approaches to symmetry within the cyclic structure by substituting the
WINTER SOLSTICE as the #CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated
references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS.
[THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan
1993, page 15-16]
One can readily conclude from the encapsulation of these specific
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35] that the
JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this EPISTEMOLOGICAL
premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER
as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]
HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 day
view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE* PERSPECTIVE
of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the new moon /
midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE:
G3625@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 3 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 76 (#246),
@6: Sup: 43 (#223); Ego: 40 (#286),
@7: Sup: 48 (#271); Ego: 5 (#291),
@8: Sup: 17 (#288 - SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE BY UMBRAL ILLUSION AS
CHIMERA IMPETUS); Ego: 50 (#341 - SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31 DECEMBER:
#341 / #444),
@9: Sup: 25 (#313); Ego: 8 (#349),
@10: Sup: 75 (#388); Ego: 50 (#399),
Male: #388; Feme: #399
} // #723
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #723 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#723 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #400, #40, #5, #50, #8, #50] = oikoumene
(G3625): {UMBRA: #35 as #723 % #41 = #26} 1) the inhabited earth; 2) the
universe, the world; 1a) *THE* *PORTION* *OF* *THE* *EARTH* *INHABITED*
*BY* *THE* *GREEKS*, *IN* *DISTINCTION* *FROM* *THE* *LANDS* *OF* *THE*
*BARBARIANS*; 1b) *THE* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *ALL* *THE* *SUBJECT*S* *OF*
*THE* *EMPIRE*; 1c) the whole inhabited earth, the world; 1d) the
inhabitants of the earth, men;
YOUTUBE: "La Vie En Rose (Grace Jones)"
http://youtu.be/YEM8TspcCBY
"I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE BARBARIANS {ie. THE CHINESE
DAOIST}; BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I
AM READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME ALSO." [Romans
1:14-15 (KJV)]
G1097@{
[#3, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)}
#10, {@2: Sup: 13 (#16); Ego: 10 (#13)}
#50, {@3: Sup: 63 (#79); Ego: 50 (#63)}
#800, {@4: Sup: 53 (#132); Ego: 71 (#134)}
#200, {@5: Sup: 10 (#142); Ego: 38 (#172)}
#20, {@6: Sup: 30 (#172); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH
PRIDE {%39})}
#5, {@7: Sup: 35 (#207); Ego: 5 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH
{%33})}
#300, {@8: Sup: 11 (#218); Ego: 57 (#254)}
#800] {@9: Sup: 1 (#219); Ego: 71 (#325 = MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 -
*SOLDIER*)}
} // #2188
G1097@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
@3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
@4: Sup: 37 (#135); Ego: 76 (#199),
@5: Sup: 75 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}); Ego: 38 (#237),
Male: #210; Feme: #237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL*
*WILL* AS *METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE*
} // #723
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #723 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#2188 as [#3, #10, #50, #800, #200, #20, #5, #300, #800] / #723 as [#3,
#50, #70, #400, #200] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #33 as #723 % #41 =
#26} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of perceive,
feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3) *JEWISH*
*IDIOM* *FOR* *SEXUAL* *INTERCOURSE* *BETWEEN* *A* *MAN* *AND* *A*
*WOMAN*; 4) to become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a)
to understand; 2b) to know;
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE: [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
TOTAL: @130 + @139 + #140 + @146 + @148 + @150 + @156 + @157 + @158 +
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {4 x 547 as [#80, #1,
#100, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] =
paralogizomai (G3884): {UMBRA: #28 as #423 % #41 = #13} 1) to reckon
wrong, miscount; 2) to cheat by false reckoning; 3) to deceive, delude,
circumvent; 2a) to deceive by false reasoning}
G4352@{
[#80, {@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80)}
#100, {@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99 as [#3, #30, #10, #6, #700]
= gillayown (H1549): {UMBRA: #61 as #99 % #41 = #17} 1) table, tablet,
mirror, flat shiny ornament); Ego: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})}
#70, {@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH
MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18})}
#200, {@4: Sup: 45 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38
(#207)}
#20, {@5: Sup: 65 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}); Ego: 20 (#227)}
#400, {@6: Sup: 60 (#275); Ego: 76 (#303)}
#50, {@7: Sup: 29 (#304); Ego: 50 (#353)}
#8, {@8: Sup: 37 (#341 - SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31 DECEMBER: #341
/ #444); Ego: 8 (#361)}
#200, {@9: Sup: 75 (#416); Ego: 38 (#399)}
#800, {@10: Sup: 65 (#481); Ego: 71 (#470)}
#200, {@11: Sup: 22 (#503); Ego: 38 (#508)}
#10, {@12: Sup: 32 (#535); Ego: 10 (#518)}
#50] {@13: Sup: 1 (#536); Ego: 50 (#568)}
} // #2188
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #2188 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; I am not a land-grabber.
#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), daily increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #146
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1725 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
#2188 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #20, #400, #50, #8, #200, #800, #200,
#10, #50] / #1725 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #20, #400, #50, #5, #800] =
proskuneo (G4352): {UMBRA: #2188 % #41 = #15 / #1725 % #41 = #3} 1)
from G4314 and a probable derivative of G2965 (meaning to kiss, like a
*DOG* licking his master's hand); 2) to kiss the hand to (towards) one,
in token of reverence 3) among the Orientals, especially the Persians,
to fall upon the knees and touch the ground with the forehead as an
expression of profound reverence 4) in the New Testament by kneeling or
prostration to do homage (to one) or make obeisance, whether in order to
express respect or to make supplication 4a) *USED* *OF* *HOMAGE* *SHOWN*
*TO* *MEN* *AND* *BEINGS* *OF* *SUPERIOR* *RANK* 4a1) *TO* *THE*
*JEWISH* *HIGH* *PRIESTS* 4a2) *TO* *GOD* 4a3) *TO* *CHRIST* 4a4) *TO*
*HEAVENLY* *BEINGS* 4a5) *TO* *DEMONS*;
"AND HE WROTE A LETTER AFTER THIS MANNER: CLAUDIUS {lame} LYSIAS
{dissolving} UNTO THE MOST EXCELLENT GOVERNOR FELIX {happy, prosperous}
SENDETH GREETING.
THIS MAN WAS TAKEN OF THE JEWS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN KILLED OF THEM:
THEN CAME I WITH AN ARMY, AND RESCUED HIM, HAVING UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS
A ROMAN {strong; powerful: #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring
good}.
AND WHEN I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE CAUSE WHEREFORE THEY ACCUSED HIM, I
BROUGHT HIM FORTH INTO THEIR COUNCIL: WHOM I PERCEIVED TO BE ACCUSED OF
#364 - *QUESTIONS* {
#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
#364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE;
} *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
#430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
*RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
*LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
*CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament;
}, BUT TO HAVE NOTHING LAID TO HIS CHARGE WORTHY OF DEATH OR OF BONDS.
G2213@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
@3: Sup: 72 (#94); Ego: 57 (#72),
@4: Sup: 80 (#174); Ego: 8 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 40 (#253); Ego: 1 (#121),
Male: #253; Feme: #121
} // #364
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #364 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; *I* *PUT* *NO* *CHECK* *UPON* *THE*
*WATER* *IN* *ITS* *FLOW*.
#VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
#TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
#CANON: #184
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
@1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
@2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
@3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
@4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184
AND WHEN IT WAS TOLD ME HOW THAT THE JEWS LAID WAIT {#TOOLS: With
Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil} FOR THE MAN, I SENT STRAIGHTWAY TO
THEE {#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends}, AND GAVE
COMMANDMENT TO HIS ACCUSERS ALSO TO SAY {#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no.
#56), few allies} BEFORE THEE WHAT THEY HAD AGAINST HIM. FAREWELL.
G3551@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 39 (#89); Ego: 70 (#120),
@3: Sup: 79 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 40 (#160),
@4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 70 (#230),
@5: Sup: 25 (#261); Ego: 38 (#268),
Male: #261; Feme: #268
} // #430
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
50 - Vastness/Wasting;
THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
Pa-Amsu, *I* *AM* *NOT* *UNCHASTE* *WITH* *ANY* *ONE*.
#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171
THEN THE #65 - SOLDIERS, AS IT WAS COMMANDED THEM, TOOK PAUL {small;
little}, AND BROUGHT {#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans} HIM
BY NIGHT TO ANTIPATRIS {for, or against the father}.
ON THE MORROW THEY LEFT THE HORSEMEN TO GO WITH HIM, AND RETURNED TO THE
CASTLE: WHO, WHEN THEY CAME TO CAESAREA {#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no.
#60), much wealth}, AND DELIVERED THE EPISTLE TO THE GOVERNOR, PRESENTED
PAUL {small; little} ALSO BEFORE HIM.
NOTE: Herod seized an opportunity to control world trade by building a
seaport on Israel's coast, where the sea routes and the predominant land
route intersected. Caesarea was a glorious city, covered with marble,
and symbolizing the *VAST* *WEALTH* that Herod accumulated by dominating
world trade. [<https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/caesarea>]
AND WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAD READ THE LETTER, HE ASKED {#POSITION: With
Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions} OF WHAT PROVINCE HE WAS. AND
WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS OF CILICIA {which rolls or overturns}; I
WILL HEAR THEE, SAID HE, WHEN THINE ACCUSERS ARE ALSO COME. AND HE
COMMANDED HIM TO BE KEPT {#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation}
IN HEROD’S {son of a hero} JUDGMENT HALL." [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]
YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"
http://youtu.be/rjkrjYitgeA
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0707 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY
2019: "And, we're back to gibberish."
DOLF @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW
MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE
STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE
(vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT) THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN
BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE
(DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION) SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING
DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' STATE."
DE [NUN] CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 0746 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019:
"THEY AREN'T ALT-RIGHT RACISTS OR NEO-NAZIS IT'S ALL FAKE NEWS OR ...
Infiltration by the left.
Seems the tattooed retards and convicted criminals are just concerned
citizens. The web-sites calling for another Cronulla and Romper Stomper
2 were a black flag operation by the left according to Matt, the rally
,sorry concerned citizens meeting, was infiltrated by the left who gave
nazi salutes (why didn't the nice concerned citizens ask them nicely to
desist) according to ANNING and according to PEZ they weren't real nazi
mates of his as they did the moustache thing.
Anyhow if the media reports anything bad about the alt-right it is fake
news. Wait maybe the Sudanese gang violence is fake news or a black face
operation by the alt-right (remember the invasion of Poland, the nazi's
have form) and it never happened if I use the Anning, Matt, pez twisted
reality.
Oh sorry that should be black flag. Sorry one and all, it did really
happen."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1501 HOURS
ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "It's definitely convenient for those who support the
Ponzi scheme that is continued mass-immigration, when objections to such
a policy can be reported on accompanied by pictures of nutbags throwing
Nazi salutes."
DOLF @ 1551 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "We can build a profile on Lions
Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com>
That there is in the email address: "SCREAMING.NUTBAG" an #312 -
ATTRIBUTE DIFFERENTIAL / #288 - IDEALISM as being political
characteristic of "PICTURES OF NUTBAGS THROWING NAZI SALUTES" as if it
didn't equally apply to them as well:
TO SEE HITLER IN THE MIRROR. {@7: Sup: 2 (#287 - SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S
IDEA: *DETERMINATIONS* *OF* *A* *MERE* *FIGMENT* *OF* *OUR* *POETIC*
*PHANTASY*); Ego: 67 (#299 - SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S IDEA: *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* *AND* *NECESSARY* *UNIVERSAL* *VALIDITY* (*FOR* *EVERYONE*)
*ARE* *THEREFORE* *INTERCHANGEABLE* *CONCEPTS*)} ...
— ANZACS WHAT FOR? {@1} —
“OUR ANZACS WENT TO WAR. {@2}
HITLER WAS A CORPORAL. {@3: #99 as [#3, #30, #10, #6, #700] = gillayown
(H1549): {UMBRA: #61 as #99 % #41 = #17} 1) table, tablet, *MIRROR*,
flat shiny ornament); Ego: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}
IT WAS FOR NOTHING MORE. {@4}
PRINCIPLE RIGHT OR MORAL. {@5}
ANZACS DIED SO MAY WE LIVE. {@6}
TO SEE HITLER IN THE *MIRROR*. {@7: *DETERMINATIONS* *OF* *A* *MERE*
*FIGMENT* *OF* *OUR* *POETIC* *PHANTASY* / *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *AND*
*NECESSARY* *UNIVERSAL* *VALIDITY* (*FOR* *EVERYONE*) *ARE* *THEREFORE*
*INTERCHANGEABLE* *CONCEPTS*}
NO REASON CAN THEY GIVE. {@8}
HIS REFLECTION OUR TERROR. {@9: #342}
GOVERNOR GENERAL KNEELS. {@10}
TO PAPAL *RING* CONFOUND. {@11}
FROM US THE EMPIRE STEALS. {@12}
DEAD UPON BARREN GROUND.” {@13}
2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an
object of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible
world. We judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That
means, however, that these principles express something not only about
the actual world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these
principles indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears
that they exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
ANZACS-WHAT-FOR?@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 3 (#22); Ego: 14 (#52),
@3: Sup: 77 (#99 as [#3, #30, #10, #6, #700] = gillayown (H1549):
{UMBRA: #61 as #99 % #41 = #17} 1) table, tablet, mirror, flat shiny
ornament); Ego: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 43 (#142); Ego: 6 (#110),
@5: Sup: 74 (#216); Ego: 49 (#159),
@6: Sup: 69 (#285); Ego: 73 (#232),
@7: Sup: 2 (#287); Ego: 67 (#299),
@8: Sup: 21 (#308); Ego: 22 (#321),
@9: Sup: 78 (#386); Ego: 21 (#342 - TORAH PROTOTYPE: #FIVE / ANKH
EGYPTIAN ROMAN PROTOTYPE: #SIX {#114 / #342} BY POSITION AS OPINION: {#5
+ #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE as AS PONTIFICATED
DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM}),
As a philosophical conception {#2184} about the notion of contingency as
to the dynamic effect of #728 - REACTANCE {8 x #91: 2 x #273 - PRINCIPLE
OF SYNCRETISM + #182 - LIMIT} and the MATERIA PRIMA {#364 - PRINCIPLE OF
ENQUIRY} susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as MATERIA
SECUNDA {#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION} as an alternative canonical
approach to mathematically expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as
MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in terms:
[cf: DIAGRAM OF THE MYSTERY (HSUAN T'U) by YANG HSIUNG, CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) syncretism published 4 / 2 BCE, HAN DYNASTY:
206 BC to 220 AD), page 456]
#1 {#99 - *MIRROR* / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH &
114 / #342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
@10: Sup: 3 (#389); Ego: 26 (#368),
@11: Sup: 76 (#465); Ego: 68 (#436),
@12: Sup: 26 (#491); Ego: 6 (#442),
@13: Sup: 30 (#521); Ego: 28 (#470),
Male: #521; Feme: #470
}
That's sort of like neo-nazis joining the *NATIONAL* PARTY so that they
can subsume the otherwise neutral and agreeable semantics of opportunity
and claim thereby to be *PATRIOTS* when they are in fact participants
within a world wide cause célèbre {#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE* *YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827
*LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*, #288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* /
*NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*, #390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*, #312 - *WITHERED*
*STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*, #419 -
*SLAUGHTER*} in accord with the dictums of a *FOREIGN* *POWER*.
If pussy boy uses the term "NUTBAGS" to describe "NAZIS WITH THEIR
VOCALIZED SALUTES" of salutation then he holds an equivalent value as
"SCREAMING.NUTBAG".
What does he do for a valedictory besides: "***@CK YOU ***@NT!"
SHOW ME SALVATION {ie. ZEIG HEIL as not to be confused with the NAZI
salute SIEG HEIL}."
SHOULD I POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS WITH THIS KANT’S 1783 (APRIORITY TO THE
FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789) CANONICAL STATEMENT AS IDEA: @B180: "Thus, if
I set down five points in succession, {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*}, this is an image of the number five:
As unconscionable attempts to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS:
#FIVE [#111/#333 ***] / TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL.
In contrast, if I think only a number in general, which may be five or
one hundred, then this thought is rather the representation of a method
for representing a multitude (e.g., one thousand) in an image according
to a certain concept than the image itself, which in this last case I
could hardly survey and compare with the concept. I call this
representation of a universal procedure of the imagination for providing
a concept with its image, then, the schema for this concept. [IDEA: @B180]
#1) λ, {@3: Sup: 34 (#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY ); Ego: 30 (#34)}
#2) λ, {@4: Sup: 64 (#105 - ROMAN HETEROS GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #THREE /
JEWISH KABBALAH PROTOTYPE #FOUR / #315);
#3) Ego: 30 (#64 - @5 #CENTRE)}
YOUTUBE: "Monkey Sees A Magic Trick"
http://youtu.be/FIxYCDbRGJc
Although we are considering #64 v’s #65 here the reality is that the
apriority dynamic of a trinomial number is NINE elements whereas the
binomial conception is EIGHT elements as CARDINAL NUMBER...
A cardinal number is a number such as 1, 3, or 10 that tells you how
many things there are in a group but not what order they are in.
An ordinal number or an ordinal is a word such as 'first', 'third', and
'tenth' that tells you where a particular thing occurs in a sequence of
things.
If I then retain ONE as functional #231 - juxtaposition control and then
deploy a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION between its trinomial / binomial meta
state my concept of it at the dialectic level may be different.
#4) ι, {@5: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 10 (#74 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL)}
#5) α] {@6: Sup: 75 (#254); Ego: 1 (#75 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL)}
It would take research worthy of a PhD to resolve such an impetus upon
French history if only made by a hypothetical postulation and impudent
presupposition
In fact, not images of objects but schemata underlie our pure sensory
concepts. No image of a triangle would ever be adequate to the concept
of a triangle in general. For it would not match the generality of the
concept, which makes it valid for all triangles, right or acute, etc.;
rather, it would always be limited to only a portion of this sphere. The
schema of a triangle can never exist anywhere except in thought, and it
signifies a rule of synthesis of the imagination with respect to pure
shapes in space. Still less does an object of experience or an image of
the object match an empirical concept, but such a concept always relates
immediately to the schema of the imagination, as a rule for determining
our intuition according to a certain general concept. The concept of
*DOG* signifies a rule according to which my imagination can specify the
figure of a four-footed animal in general, without being restricted to
any one particular shape presented to me by experience, or even to any
possible image that I can exhibit *IN* *CONCRETO*.” [IDEA: B179]" [pages
173-174]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1802 HOURS
ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "Interesting that you characterise an entire crowd by
a *FANTASY* *OF* *YOUR* *OWN* about 2 or 3 people you imagine were there.
Here is some footage that a person intending to be well-informed would
want to study:
http://youtu.be/dnBa9UmrJMA
Especially interested to hear what you have to say about the warm
welcome the "neo-nazis" give to two Vietnamese guys at 15:50 in the video:
http://youtu.be/dnBa9UmrJMA
As it turned out, there was more brown skin on the "neo-nazi" side of
the rally than on the blindingly-white, red-flag-waving other side of
the police line.
But DECHUCKA and the other marxist dupes just lap up the fake news."
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 *AS* *APRIORITY* *TO* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) IDEA @287: "Pure mathematics, and especially pure
geometry, can have objective *REALITY* *ONLY* *UNDER* *THE* *SINGLE*
*CONDITION* *THAT* *IT* *REFERS* *MERELY* *TO* *OBJECTS* *OF* *THE*
*SENSES*, *WITH* *REGARD *TO* *WHICH* *OBJECTS*, *HOWEVER*, *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *REMAINS* *FIXED*, *THAT* *OUR* *SENSORY* *REPRESENTATION*
*IS* *BY* *NO* *MEANS* *A* *REPRESENTATION* *OF* *THINGS* *IN*
*THEMSELVES*, *BUT* *ONLY* *OF* *THE* *WAY* *IN* *WHICH* *THEY* *APPEAR*
*TO* *US*. From this it follows, not at all that the propositions of
geometry *ARE* *DETERMINATIONS* *OF* *A* *MERE* *FIGMENT* *OF* *OUR*
*POETIC* *PHANTASY*, and therefore could not with certainty be referred
to actual objects, but rather, that they are valid necessarily for space
and consequently for everything that may be found in space, because
space is nothing other than the form of all outer appearances, under
which alone objects of the senses can be given to us.
Sensibility, whose form lies at the foundation of geometry, is that upon
which the possibility of outer appearances rests; these, therefore, can
never contain anything other than what geometry prescribes to them. It
would be completely different if the senses had to represent objects as
they are in themselves. For then it absolutely would not follow from the
representation of space, a representation that serves a priori, with all
the various properties of space, as foundation for the geometer, that
all of this, together with what is deduced from it, must be exactly so
in nature. The space of the geometer would be taken for mere fabrication
and would be credited with no objective validity, because it is simply
not to be seen how things would have to agree necessarily with the image
that we form of them by ourselves and in advance. If, however, this
image – or, better, this formal intuition – is the essential property of
our sensibility by means of which alone objects are given to us, and if
this sensibility represents not things in themselves but only their
appearances, then it is very easy to comprehend, and at the same time to
prove incontrovertibly: that all outer objects of our sensible world
must necessarily agree, in complete exactitude, with the propositions of
geometry, because sensibility itself, through its form of outer
intuition (space), with which the geometer deals, first makes those
objects possible, as mere appearances. [pages 37-38]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 *AS* *APRIORITY* *TO* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #19 AS IDEA @299: "*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *AND*
*NECESSARY* *UNIVERSAL* *VALIDITY* (*FOR* *EVERYONE*) *ARE* *THEREFORE*
*INTERCHANGEABLE* *CONCEPTS*, and although we do not know the object in
itself, nonetheless, if we regard a judgment as universally valid and
hence necessary, objective validity is understood to be included.
Through this judgment we cognize the object (even if it otherwise
remains unknown as it may be in itself) by means of the universally
valid and necessary connection of the given perceptions; and since this
is the case for all objects of the senses, judgments of experience will
not derive their objective validity from the immediate cognition of the
object (for this is impossible), but merely from the condition for the
universal validity of empirical judgments, which, as has been said,
never rests on empirical, or indeed sensory conditions at all, but on a
pure concept of the understanding. The object always remains unknown in
itself; if, however, through the concept of the understanding the
connection of the representations which it provides to our sensibility
is determined as universally valid, then the object is determined
through this relation, and the judgment is objective.
Let us provide examples: that the room is warm, the sugar sweet, the
wormwood repugnant, are merely subjectively valid judgments. I do not at
all require that I should find it so at every time, or that everyone
else should find it just as I do; they express only a relation of two
sensations to the same subject, namely myself, and this only in my
present state of perception, and are therefore not expected to be valid
for the object: these I call judgments of perception. The case is
completely different with judgments of experience. What experience
teaches me under certain circumstances, it must teach me at every time
and teach everyone else as well, and its validity is not limited to the
subject or its state at that time. Therefore I express all such
judgments as objectively valid; as, e.g., if I say: the air is elastic,
then this judgment is to begin with only a judgment of perception; I
relate two sensations in my senses only to one another.
If I want it to be called a judgment of experience, I then require that
this connection be subject to a condition that makes it universally
valid. I want therefore that I, at every time, and also everyone else,
would necessarily have to conjoin the same perceptions under the same
circumstances." [pages 19-20]
— TIME DIDN'T DENY —
[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]
“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY *ROT* {ie. SEE: #1123 / #729 / US corruption on the part of
officials}.
SOIL SODDEN.
WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”
#1123 as [#5, #400, #300, #8, #10, #400] / #729 as [#5, #300, #8, #10,
#400, #6] = shachath (H7843): {UMBRA: #3 as #729 % #41 = #32} 1) to
destroy, corrupt, go to ruin, decay; 1a) (Niphal) to be marred, be
spoiled, be corrupted, be corrupt, be injured, be ruined, be *ROTTED*;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spoil, ruin; 1b2) *TO* *PERVERT*, *CORRUPT*, *DEAL*
*CORRUPTLY* (*MORALLY*); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to spoil, ruin, destroy;
1c2) to pervert, corrupt (morally); 1c3) destroyer (participle); 1d)
(Hophal) spoiled, ruined (participle);
#341 as [#5, #80, #70, #50, #70, #40, #1, #7, #8, #10] = eponomazo
(G2028): {UMBRA: #13 as #1123 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *PUT* *A* *NAME*
*UPON*, *NAME*; 2) *TO* *BE* *NAMED*;
EVIDENCE OF TARGETING: #1123 as [#300, #2, #400, #6, #400, #10, #5] /
#707 as [#5, #300, #2, #400] = shabbath (H7676): {UMBRA: #6 as #707 %
#41 = #10} 1) *SABBATH*; 1a) sabbath; 1b) day of atonement; 1c) sabbath
year; 1d) week; 1e) produce (in sabbath year);
#1123 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #800, #50] / #553 as [#3, #5, #50,
#5, #200, #10, #70, #10, #200] = genesia (G1077): {UMBRA: #22 as #553 %
#41 = #20} 1) *A* *BIRTHDAY* *CELEBRATION*, a birthday feast; 1a) the
earlier Greeks used this word of *FUNERAL* *COMMEMORATIONS*, *A*
*FESTIVAL* *COMMEMORATIVE* *OF* *A* *DECEASED* *FRIEND*;
REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}
V'S
PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 +
#390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341
% #41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN
ABHORRENT RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE
AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling
together; 1a) convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;
#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365
% #41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.
According to IMMANUEL KANT, DAVID HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh)
was a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, and
essayist, who is best known today for his highly influential system of
philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism, who had raised
objections to the notions of equality and congruence (among others)
within geometry, which objections appealed to experience (Treatise,
i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53), thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and
whereby he also *INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS
CONSIDERS ITS OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*
As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {
*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING
v's
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} +
#728 - REACTANCE {8 x #91 = 2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*} +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @7 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC
SUCCESSION {#273}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {ie.
#24 x #7 x #13 as #2184 ipso facto
6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY AS OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7,
#20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*},
7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION AS AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40,
#50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion (G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*},
8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION AS ASSISTING / DEVOTE
ONESELF(H5144) {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772
): 1) *WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182
= SUNSET OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2001} IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS UNDER
SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT
} that we can know only through experience, but lawfulness in the
connection of appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to
know through any experience, because experience itself has need of such
laws, which lie a priori at the basis of its possibility.
That there was a determined campaign of partiality shown to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL established on 29 OCTOBER 1909 being the cornerstone of
Australian identity as ethos of "#OBEDIENT, #AIDING AND #ASSISTING" and
we reject CATEGORICALLY their unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL
assent given to FOREIGN POWERS {ie. ESPECIALLY IRISH, SCOTTISH, RSL /
FREEMASONRY / ROMAN CATHOLIC [BY] SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} as all
unconscionable attempts to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS: #FIVE
[#111/#333 ***] / TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS
AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL {#235 - ADOLF
HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO*
*FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS* *OF* *MERCY* *DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR*
*PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*, *WILLINGLY* *OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*} upon our War Dead and to usurp @1
{HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] / TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234 ***]} the
SOVEREIGNTY embodied within the Governor General as ANTHROPIC
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE {#2184}.
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 +
#390 + #390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM*
*THE* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, *WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE*." [page 70]
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2208 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2018:
"Learn to read for comprehension.
He's a moron because he put forward a defence of thugs by mentioning ONE
chap with his Cleese salute yet right beside him is another doing the
Nazi salute.
[<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-05/neo-nazi-presence-at-st-kildas-far-right-rally/10687296>]
PETZL PENCIL DICK @ 2103 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "Typical of a
collaboration of fakenews..."
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2208 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2018:
"And typical of y[o]u tha[t] you are so incapable of following the news
that you couldn't manage to figure out whi[ch] of the two pics I
provided to identify the neo- Nazi thugs.
Snip of *DOLF* type rant."
PETZL PENCIL DICK @ 2103 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "It cannot be
overstated, Bolsheviks committed the greatest human #419 - *SLAUGHTER*
in history, and the fact that the world is largely ignorant and uncaring
about this fact is proof that the global media are in the hands of the
perpetrators" Russian novelist, historian, and short story writer. A.
Solzhenitsyn - Gulag Archipelago
Stalin has decreed that murder is a capitalist disease; there is no
murder in a communist paradise. The soviet governments job was to shoot
and kill anyone who had proof of something different
'OUR' government and media decree that this 'secular multiculturalism
paradise' does not have immigrant crime and remove anyone stating
different!. Pauline Hanson was falsely jailed for exactly this.
Australians are multi-racial not multicultural..."
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2208 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2018:
"Actually we are both."
PETZL PENCIL DICK @ 2103 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "It's not about
keeping Australia white, it's about keeping Australia right -- having
the right people, the right culture and the right feeling. What we've
got here now is totally away from where we want to be.
PETZL ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens" *LAST*, Federal
State and Council! Or you are voting for Multiculturalism.
Globalisation,Islam, Sharia. All complete lying Charlatans!
"Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same
reason." [Mark Twain]"
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2208 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2018:
"No may be away form where a few neo Nazis want us to be but most of us
like the country we live in. Just because you don't like it doesn't
make our and your neo Nazi mates the arbiters of what happens here."
DOLF @ 2222 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "THUS IN TERMS OF THE 3x3 MAGIC
SQUARE {ie. #205 ☯️ / ✡️ #164 as #41 - ontic necessity of moral
prescriptions} as ARCH / CONCRETE REALITY of INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL:
THE #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ARE THE
ONTIC DEFINITIONS:
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
TOTAL @45 + @68 = #113 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 + @104 + @115 = #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
TOTAL: @130 + @139 + #140 + @146 + @148 + @150 + @156 + @157 + @158 +
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
TOTAL: #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x
#364 IS THE 'OTH CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH
TAKEN THIS *COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]
#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE
#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* ARE THE DIALECTICS OF TEMPORALITY
#2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 as either:
#6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
BY MEANS APPRAISAL of any intuited fluidity, capacity or propensity for
truth telling can be made by deploying vEVENT categories #432 which
conveys the propositional factoid of a common ISOPSEPHIC {ie. isos
meaning 'equal' and psephos meaning 'pebble'; The Hebrew word for
'pebble' is tz'ror – and it happens that this word also means 'bond'}
association whereby the propensity for violence increases where there is
a lack of any truth content as a depreciated integrity between persons:
#432 - VIOLENCE PROPENSITY as [#5, #80, #10, #300, #10, #9, #8, #10]
#432 - TRUTH QUOTIENT as [#40, #1, #300, #1, #10, #70, #10]
Criteria of accountability for any immigrant desiring citizenship in
Australia is a #873 - probity / #644 - decorum for the #2184 - sovereign
/ autonomy as cosmogonic anthropologic principle embodied in the
Governor General and that invigorates compliance to #902 - rule of law:
EGALITÉ, #492 - voluntary free will: LIBERTÉ and a regard for #391 -
homogeneous principles of civil society: FRATERNITÉ
A similar statement would solve your #1827 - problem ...
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN
VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM
from #1827 - OPPRESSION is:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE /
12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE
OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
If the meaning of that statement was known (ie. Queen Victoria died 22
January 1901 within 3 weeks of its enactment) there would NEVER have
been a WORLD WAR ONE / TWO.
That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict
against nature itself.
PROPOSITION MADE TO SALE HOSPITAL ON 19 DECEMBER 2018 REGARDING
TRANSITIONING THE BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY OF TRIAGE TOWARDS A TRINOMIAL
SAPIENT {EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE, KNOWLEDGE PRAGMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE} PARADIGM FOR THE ECONOMICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF AUTONOMY AND
VIABILITY OF FISCAL OPPORTUNITY BY PRODUCTIVITY GAINS:
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X N] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #41 =
#12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* } +
@4 {#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 =
#15 {#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
The importance of this in relation to [α, ρ, χ, η] as being "(properly
abstract) a commencement, or (*CONCRETE*) chief (in various applications
of order, time, place or rank):--beginning, corner, (at the, the) first
(estate), magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule" cannot be
overstated as we've recently publicly shown in having to CORRECT THE
RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY / IGNORANCE ON TRANSCENDENT QUESTIONS OF SOVEREIGNTY /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC WHICH ARE NOT SUB-ORDINATE TO ISLAM RELIGIOUS DOGMAS.
"THEREFORE LEAVING THE #41 - *ONTIC* / #SOUTH NECESSITY PRINCIPLES {
#41 - KANT'S ONTIC PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVE: IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH
METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE
CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE
CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
[α, {@1: Sup: 1 (#1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG / #NORTH); Ego: 1 (#1 -
#NORTH)}
ρ, {@2: Sup: 20 (#21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS / #EAST); Ego: 19 (#20)}
χ, {@3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53)}
η] {@4: Sup: 61 (#135 - ISLAM'S *STOICHEION* *OF* *MORAL*
*BLINDNESS**AS* *LACK* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *IGNORANCE* *ESPECIALLY*
*OF* *DIVINE* *THINGS*); Ego: 8 (#61 - #WEST)}
FOUR MALE SYMBOLS (四象) OF SIGNS (OF HEAVENS, APPROVAL, ETC) AS ADVISORS
(四輔 - SÌFǓ) UPON THE CHARIOTS OF TWENTY-EIGHT LUNAR MANSiONS
#EAST: Azure Dragon (青龍) assigned to the Spring equinox (#21 - I DO NOT
CAUSE TERRORS)
#SOUTH: Vermilion Bird (朱雀) assigned to the Summer solstice (#41)
#WEST: White Tiger (白虎) assigned to the Autumn equinox (#61)
#NORTH: Black Tortoise (玄武) assigned to the Winter solstice (#1 - I AM
NOT A DOER OF WRONG])
#CENTER: Yellow Dragon (黃龍) Earth AND THE HIEROS LOGOS AS THE FAUX
LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
} OF THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, LET US GO ON UNTO PERFECTION; NOT LAYING
AGAIN THE FOUNDATION OF REPENTANCE FROM DEAD WORKS, AND OF FAITH TOWARD
GOD, OF THE DOCTRINE OF BAPTISMS, AND OF LAYING ON OF HANDS, AND OF
RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD, AND OF ETERNAL JUDGMENT. AND THIS WILL WE DO,
IF GOD PERMIT." [Hebrews 6:1-20 (KJV)]
— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —
“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY *RING*.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD. {@9: Sup: 21 (#312 - *CONTRACTION*); Ego: 43 (#333 -
#CENTRE OF ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL PROTOTYPE)}”
AS THE #1827 - HETRODOX BLASPHEMY WHICH IS THE CORRUPT EMBODIMENT OF THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH (VATICAN CITY STATE) DOES NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA
OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR #873 - PROBITY AND #644 - DECORUM IN COMPLIANCE TO
#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE WE ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS THIS AUSTRALIA DAY 26
JANUARY 2019 the TRANSITION INTO PERPETUAL *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *YOUR*
*JINGOISTIC* *SOLDIER* *PANTOMIME* which is a parallax within the #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE (ie. #65 - *SOLDIER*) as historical perspective
commonly deployed by ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as the exemplar mapping to
each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months (for example: #9 - SHU
{Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27 to 31
January / #65 CE) against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33 Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are LINE-BY-LINE POLAR
OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is PARTICULAR to
APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO CLAUDIUS CAESAR
AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 AD – 9 JUNE 68 AD):
— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —
"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})
TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."
YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)
<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>
NOTE: Boudica was a queen of the British Celtic Iceni tribe who led an
uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire in AD 60 or
61, and died shortly after its failure, having supposedly poisoned
herself. She is considered a British folk hero. Boudica's husband,
Prasutagus, ruled as a nominally independent ally of Rome, and left his
kingdom jointly to his daughters and to the Roman emperor in his will.
However, when he died, his will was ignored, and the kingdom was annexed
and his property taken. According to Tacitus, Boudica was flogged and
her daughters raped.
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 *AS* *APRIORITY* *TO* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #34 AS IDEA @317: Two important, nay completely
indispensable, though utterly dry investigations were therefore needed,
which were carried out in the Critique, pp. 137 ff. and 235 ff.14
Through the first of these it was shown that *THE* *SENSES* *DO* *NOT*
*SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*,
*BUT* *ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*, and that the object
appropriate to this schema is found only in experience (as the product
of the understanding from materials of sensibility). In the second
investigation (Critique, p. 235) it is shown: that notwithstanding the
independence from experience of our pure concepts of the understanding
and principles, and even their apparently larger sphere of use,
nonetheless, outside the field of experience nothing at all can be
thought by means of them, because they can do nothing but merely
determine the logical form of judgment with respect to given intuitions;
but since beyond the field of sensibility there is no intuition at all,
these pure concepts lack completely all significance, in that there are
no means through which they can be exhibited *IN* *CONCRETO*, and so all
such noumena, together with their aggregate – an intelligible world –
are nothing but representations of a problem, whose object is in itself
perfectly possible, but whose solution, given the nature of our
understanding, is completely impossible, since our understanding is no
faculty of intuition but only of the connection of given intuitions in
an [IDEA: @317] experience; and experience therefore has to contain all
the objects for our concepts, whereas apart from it all concepts will be
without significance, since no intuition can be put under them." [pages
67-68]
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019:
"***@CK off *DOLT*!
Stop using my name to forge posts!"
— NOW I SEE? —
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT.
THE *MIRROR* TO PEER.
YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
FRAN [CUNNING LINGUIST] SNORTELUS
(***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1627 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019:
"***@CK OF[F] you creep! If you want to forge anyone's sig, try Matty Boys."
DOLF @ 1643 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019: "What else would you as a fascist
whore by self-entitlement of marriage like to talk about relative to the
#873 - PROBITY and #644 - DECORUM accorded to DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS
/ MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD
{%7}} AND BECOMES IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION
(TELOS) A TREASONOUS TRANSGRESSION?"
Je suis paris!
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 4 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
>
>
