-- WE KNOW THAT HE IS PRETENDING HIS PIETY IS WORTH SOMETHING WHEN IT IS NOT BUT WHERE IS Jos Berger Noit?

dolf

2019-03-02 21:53:38 UTC

"And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus {#236 as [#1, #100,
#5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, saying, May we
know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?" [Acts 17:19 (KJV)]

"Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70,
#50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus} hill {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10,
#70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, and said, Ye men of Athens,
I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious." [Acts 17:22 (KJV)]

#400 - #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #236 - *AREUM* *JUDICIUM*
*AN* *CURIA* (*THE* *AREA* *OF* *JUDGES* / *SENATE* *OR* *MEETING*
*HOUSE*): MARS HILL ATHENS WHERE THE APOSTLE PAUL WAS NOT LED TO DEFEND
HIMSELF BEFORE JUDGES, BUT THAT HE MIGHT *SET* *FORTH* *HIS* *OPINIONS*
*ON* *DIVINE* *SUBJECTS* TO A GREATER MULTITUDE OF PEOPLE, FLOCKING
TOGETHER THERE AND EAGER TO HEAR SOMETHING NEW:

YOUTUBE: "Don't Cry for Me Argentina (Elaine Paige)"

"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any
twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and
spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts
and intents {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771):
intent} of the heart." [Hebrews 4:12 (KJV)]

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm
yourselves likewise with the same mind {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10,
#1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): intent}: for he that hath suffered in the
flesh hath ceased from sin;" [1Peter 4:1 (KJV)]

H6965@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 24 (#29); Ego: 19 (#24),
   @3: Sup: 64 (#93); Ego: 40 (#64),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#167); Ego: 10 (#74),
   @5: Sup: 26 (#193); Ego: 33 (#107),
   Male: #193; Feme: #107
} // #195

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #195 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#195 as [#5, #100, #40, #10, #600] = quwm (H6965): {UMBRA: #8 as #195 %
#41 = #31} 1) to rise, arise, stand, rise up, stand up; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to arise; 1a2) to arise (hostile sense); 1a3) to arise, become powerful;
1a4) to arise, come on the scene; 1a5) to stand; 1a5a) to maintain
oneself; 1a5b) to be established, be confirmed; 1a5c) to stand, endure;
1a5d) to be fixed; 1a5e) to be valid; 1a5f) to be proven; 1a5g) to be
fulfilled; 1a5h) to persist; 1a5i) to be set, be fixed; 1b) (Piel); 1b1)
to fulfil; 1b2) to confirm, ratify, establish, impose; 1c) (Polel) to
raise up; 1d) (Hithpael) to raise oneself, rise up; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1)
to cause to arise, raise; 1e2) to raise, set up, erect, build; 1e3) to
raise up, bring on the scene; 1e4) to raise up, rouse, stir up,
investigate; 1e5) to raise up, constitute; 1e6) to cause to stand, set,
station, establish; 1e7) to make binding; 1e8) to carry out, give effect
to; 1f) (Hophal) to be raised up;

G697@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#46); Ego: 5 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#81); Ego: 10 (#35),
   @5: Sup: 24 (#105); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @6: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 50 (#155),
   Male: #179; Feme: #155
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #386 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): {UMBRA: #16
as #386 % #41 = #17} 1) a rocky height in the city of Athens, opposite
the western end of the Acropolis toward the west. This hill belonged to
(Ares) Mars and was called Mar's Hill; so called, because, as the story
went, Mars, having slain Halirrhothius, son of Neptune, for the
attempted violation of his daughter Alicippe, was tried for the murder
here before twelve gods as judges. This place was the location where the
judges convened who, by appointment of Solon, had jurisdiction of
capital offences, (as wilful murder, arson, poisoning, malicious
wounding, and breach of established religious usages). The court itself
was called Areopagus from the place where it sat, also Areum judicium an
curia. To that hill the apostle Paul was not led to defend himself
before judges, but that he might set forth his opinions on divine
subjects to a greater multitude of people, flocking together there and
eager to hear something new;

G1771@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
   @3: Sup: 24 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 50 (#105),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#97); Ego: 70 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   @5: Sup: 23 (#120); Ego: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
   @6: Sup: 24 (#144); Ego: 1 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @7: Sup: 74 (#218); Ego: 50 (#236),
   Male: #218; Feme: #236
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): {UMBRA: #18
as #186 % #41 = #22} 1) the act of thinking, consideration, meditation;
2) a thought, notion, conception; 3) mind, understanding, will, manner
of feeling, and thinking;

}, *ALSO* *EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT*
*EXPELS* *ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE*
*CREEP* *IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING*, *AND* *IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*.
Those concepts that, under the name of concepts of reflection, I had
also put into a table under the guidance of the categories mingle in
ontology with the pure concepts of the understanding without privilege
and legitimate claims, although the latter are concepts of connection
and thereby of the object itself, whereas the former are only concepts
of the mere comparison of already given concepts, and therefore have an
entirely different nature and use; through my law-governed division
(Critique, p. 260) they are extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a
completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of
metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

TOTAL: @166 + @168 + @169 + @171 + @173 + @175 + @177 + @180 + @181 +
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {

@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “It’s a rhetorical question which
strikes at the very heart of Dutch Justice against the sovereign
autonomy of its people as criteria of existence:

'DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF THESE FUCK KNUCKLE REPROBATE ISLAMISTS?'

By such is demanded that the weighty matter as trinomial SCALES OF
JUSTICE are firstly placed within a PROPER BALANCE by the COURT before
any consideration is determined:

#523 as [#5, #200, #300, #1, #9, #8] = histemi (G2476): {UMBRA: #35 as
#523 % #41 = #31} 1) to cause or make to stand, to place, put, set; 2)
to stand; 1a) *TO* *BID* *TO* *STAND* *BY*, [*SET* *UP*]; 1a1) *IN*
*THE* *PRESENCE* *OF* *OTHERS*, *IN* *THE* *MIDST*, *BEFORE* *JUDGES*,
before members of the Sanhedrin;; 1a2) to place; 1b) to make firm, fix
establish; 1b1) to cause a person or a thing to keep his or its place;
1b2) *TO* *STAND*, *BE* *KEPT* *INTACT* (*OF* *FAMILY*, *A* *KINGDOM*),
*TO* *ESCAPE* *IN* *SAFETY*; 1b3) *TO* *ESTABLISH* *A* *THING*, *CAUSE*
*IT* *TO* *STAND*; 1b31) *TO* *UPHOLD* *OR* *SUSTAIN* *THE* *AUTHORITY*
*OR* *FORCE* *OF* *ANYTHING*; 1c) *TO* *SET* *OR* *PLACE* *IN* *A*
*BALANCE*; 1c1) to weigh: money to one (because in very early times
before the introduction of coinage, the metals used to be weighed); 2a)
to stand by or near; 2a1) to stop, stand still, to stand immovable,
stand firm; 2a1a) of the foundation of a building; 2b) to stand; 2b1)
*CONTINUE* *SAFE* *AND* *SOUND*, *STAND* *UNHARMED*, *TO* *STAND*
*READY* *OR* *PREPARED*; 2b2) to be of a steadfast mind; 2b3) of
quality, one who does not hesitate, does not waiver;

And the court be not unduly prejudiced in any lesser or more degree by
the circumstance of irreconcilable dichotomies of sensibility and
circumscribing reality by those which have recourse to a binomial
methodology for professing there are only two sides to a coin. My client
GEERT WILDERS is innocent of the obscenity which is here Dutch Justice.

Mangoes Rice & Cream

PS. This is a parody and such travesty is lawful when artistic merit is
claimed”

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “The point of such goodwill as
respectful objection (ie. as then INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER IN
CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016) made of the DUTCH
JUDICATORY'S ADVERSE DETERMINATION AGAINST POLITICIAN GEERT WILDERS
ISLAMIC DEFAMATION which we have always maintained (ie. within 24 hours
of its determinations and our intuition conveyed then has been hereby
ratified is the impost upon the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic) is against
the notional binomial dichotomy of a MORE / LESS construct is that the
regime of piety defines its nomenclature of belief as an antagonism made
against autonomy itself.

Realizing that from our informal analysis made of the VOC experience
against Captain James Cook @ BATAVIA on 25 December 1770 (and later
having recourse to Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 which has cognition
of TRINOMIAL NUMBER) such antagonism against autonomy itself being in
this instance an absconded sailor, we recognize by the NATURE of the
dialog conforming to implicit and exacting CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
which itself frames our knowledge of there being a TRINOMIAL paradigm
capable by REASON of unambiguously and equitably defining SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY, that the capacity for VOC as an organisation to function with
the traditional binomial notion of STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE is in all
probability due to such TRINOMIAL PARADIGM / BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY being
capable of an orbital and sub-ordinate characteristic of STATEHOOD.

The concern over the MORE / LESS binary construct is that by there being
an implied antagonism against AUTONOMY itself as an attribution of
STATEHOOD {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN}, it is thereby inferring a TRINOMIAL
construct and a consideration is then made in juxtaposition to a regime
of piety which defines itself by a binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic
as its nomenclature against a principle of STATE which is itself defined
as a trinomial construct of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA #325: "Finally, I related
these functions of judging to objects in general, or rather to the
condition [IDEA: @324] for determining judgments as objectively valid,
and there arose pure concepts of the understanding, about which I could
have no doubt that precisely these only, and of them only so many,
*NEITHER* *MORE* *NOR* *FEWER*, can make up our entire cognition of
things out of the bare understanding. As was proper, I called them
categories, after their ancient name, whereby I reserved for myself to
append in full, under the name of predicables, all the concepts
derivable from them – whether by connecting them with one another, or
with the pure form of appearance (space and time), or with its matter,
provided the latter is not yet determined empirically (the object of
sensation in general) – just as soon as a system of transcendental
philosophy should be achieved, on behalf of which I had, at the time,
been concerned only with the critique of reason itself.

NOTE: What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or
value systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of
the world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a
set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.  Each level of cultural and human development
represents a value system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a
meme. Just as genes carry the informational codes for our biological
DNA, these value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with
“themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs,
values, common ways of looking at the world that, like contagious
viruses, spread from brain to brain through word of mouth, through
media, through interaction between people. The third angel’s message is
a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the world with the
divine virus of the gospel.  There are more than 6 billion people in the
world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we
share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this
topic have identified only eight thus far.

But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2
{#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17
SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can colour-code
them (Figure A).

<Loading Image...

>

[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]

When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).  Notice how the Focus
column alternates between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours)
and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the
differences people value the most in each system as they flow from
survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to raw power and
instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies
for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to alternative
forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural
form (Coral).

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL) ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of development in
this chart or any other useful one, for the ideal that God sets before
us is “higher than the highest human thought can reach.” [Courtesy:
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How Cultural
Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]

The essential thing, however, in this system of categories, by which it
is distinguished from that ancient rhapsody (which proceeded without any
principle), and in virtue of which it alone deserves to be counted as
philosophy, consists in this: that through it the *TRUE* *SIGNIFICATION*
*OF* *THE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* and the
condition of their use could be exactly determined. For here it became
apparent that the pure concepts of the understanding are, of themselves,
nothing but logical functions, but that as such they do not constitute
the least concept of an object in itself but rather need sensory
intuition as a basis, and even then they serve only to determine
empirical judgments – which are otherwise undetermined and indifferent
with respect to all the functions of judging – with respect to those
functions, so as to procure universal validity for these judgments, and
thereby to make judgments of experience possible in general.

This sort of insight into the nature of the categories, which would at
the same time restrict their use merely to experience, never occurred to
their first originator, or to anyone after him; but *WITHOUT* *THIS*
*INSIGHT* (*WHICH* *DEPENDS* *PRECISELY* *ON* *THEIR* *DERIVATION* *OR*
*DEDUCTION*), they are completely useless and are a paltry list of
names, without explanation or rule for their use. *HAD* *ANYTHING*
*LIKE* *IT* *EVER* *OCCURRED* *TO* *THE* *ANCIENTS*, *THEN* *WITHOUT*
*DOUBT* *THE* *ENTIRE* *STUDY* *OF* *COGNITION* *THROUGH* *PURE*
*REASON*, which under the name of metaphysics has ruined so many good
minds over the centuries, would have come down to us in a *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *FORM* *AND* *WOULD* [IDEA: @325] *HAVE* *ENLIGHTENED* *THE*
*HUMAN* *UNDERSTANDING*, instead of, as has actually happened,
exhausting it in murky and vain ruminations and making it unserviceable
for true science.

This system of categories now makes all treatment of any object of pure
reason itself systematic in turn, and it yields an undoubted instruction
or guiding thread as to how and through what points of inquiry any
metaphysical contemplation must be directed if it is to be complete; for
it exhausts all moments of the understanding, under which every other
concept must be brought. Thus too has arisen the table of principles, of
whose completeness we can be assured only through the system of
categories; and even in the division of concepts that are supposed to go
beyond the physiological use of the understanding (Critique, p. 344,
also p. 415), there is always the same guiding thread, which, since it
always must be taken through the same fixed points determined a priori
in the human understanding, forms a closed circle every time, leaving no
room for doubt that the object of a pure concept of the understanding or
reason, insofar as it is to be examined philosophically and according to
a priori principles, can be cognized completely in this way. I have not
even been able to refrain from making use of this guide with respect to
one of the *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*,
*NAMELY* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING*, and accordingly from achieving a
rule-governed and necessary table (Critique, p. 292).

*THIS* *VERY* *SYSTEM*, *LIKE* *EVERY* *TRUE* *SYSTEM* *FOUNDED* *ON*
*A* *UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLE* [IDEA: @326] {eg: #277 - *RIGHT* *TO*
*PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY*}, *ALSO*
*EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT* *EXPELS*
*ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE* *CREEP*
*IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, *AND*
*IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*. Those concepts that,
under the name of concepts of reflection, I had also put into a table
under the guidance of the categories mingle in ontology with the pure
concepts of the understanding without privilege and legitimate claims,
although the latter are concepts of connection and thereby of the object
itself, whereas the former are only concepts of the mere comparison of
already given concepts, and therefore have an entirely different nature
and use; through my law-governed division (Critique, p. 260) they are
extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a
completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of
metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

I make the further observation that any postulation made of the binomial
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic which has an embodiment within the IDEA
#325 - *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*, *NAMELY*
*THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING* of it being accomplished by a CANONICAL
TRANSPOSITION {ie.

BINOMIAL EIGHT:

#1 + #2 = #3;
#3 + #4 = #7;
#5 + #6 = #11;
#7 + #8 = #15

AS TOTALLING #36 WITH A MAGIC SUM OF #111 / #666

ELEMENT METATHESIS OF TRANSPOSITION MADE AGAINST THE NINE ELEMENT
TRINOMIAL NUMBER AS EXHIBITING AN #65 / #260 (#64 ELEMENTS) ANALOGY AS
WITH AN #1 RETENTION

} as an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD proposition made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY:

@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

In having an historical precedent as the characteristic of EUNUCHS both
in the embodiment of criminal punishment and loss of autonomy such as in
the instance of WANG FU (eunuch) during the HAN DYNASTY (206 BCE to 220
CE) which is exhibited by the story in 172 CE, when EMPRESS DOWAGER DOU
MIAO died, an unknown vandal wrote on the palace door:

'ALL THAT IS UNDER THE HEAVEN IS IN UPHEAVAL.
CAO AND WANG MURDERED THE EMPRESS DOWAGER.
THE KEY OFFICIALS ONLY KNOW HOW TO BE OFFICIALS,
AND HAD NOTHING FAITHFUL TO SAY.'
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Fu_(eunuch)>]

FROM SLAVES TO POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS
Eunuchs, or 'non-men' as they could be known, first appeared in the
royal courts of ancient pre-imperial Chinese states where they were
employed as servants in the inner chambers of the palace. They were more
or less slaves and were usually acquired as children from border
territories, especially those to the south. Castrated and brought to
serve the royal household, they had no real means of altering their
lives. Eunuchs were *REGARDED* *AS* *THE* *MOST* *TRUSTWORTHY* *OF*
*SERVANTS* *BECAUSE* *THEY* *COULD* *NEITHER* *SEDUCE* *WOMEN* *OF*
*THE* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *FATHER* *CHILDREN* *WHICH* *MIGHT* *FORM* *A*
*DYNASTY* to rival that of the sitting emperor’s.

Eunuchs were powerful political players in ancient Chinese government.
Originating as trusted slaves in the royal household they were ambitious
to use their favoured position to gain political power. Advising the
emperor from within the palace and blocking the access of officials to
their ruler, the eunuchs were eventually able to acquire noble titles
themselves, form a bureaucracy to rival the state’s and even select and
remove emperors of their choosing. Their influence on government would
result in the falling of dynasties and last right up to the 17th century CE.

Very often the eunuchs encouraged and made worse political factions,
which damaged the unity of the government. Eunuchs are charged with
playing a major part in the fall of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE).
During the 2nd century CE, in particular, a succession of weak emperors
were easily manipulated by the eunuchs at court. In 124 CE they even put
their own child candidate on the imperial throne. They gained more
imperial favour and further entrenched their position in 159 CE by
helping Emperor Huan settle a family succession dispute. In gratitude,
the emperor awarded a noble title to five leading eunuchs.

The eunuchs’ even greater power ultimately resulted in government
officials and students banding together and staging protests in 166 and
168-169 CE. The eunuchs would not be put off so lightly though and they
instigated a wave of purges which saw many of those involved in the
protests imprisoned and 100 executed. The luckier officials, students,
and intellectuals who had spoken out against eunuch power were merely
excluded from ever holding public office. In 189 CE events took an even
more brutal turn. The eunuchs murdered the 'Grand General' He Jin after
it was discovered he had plotted to assemble an army to himself purge
the eunuchs. The general’s followers exacted immediate revenge by
killing all the eunuchs in the palace. With this power vacuum there then
ensued a civil war for control of the empire, with the result that the
Han fell and the Wei dynasty was established in 220 CE.
[<https://www.ancient.eu/article/1109/eunuchs-in-ancient-china/>]

Thus given such a history of national identity as the capacity for
antagonisms against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY why then there should
naturally emerge from such conflicted national identity the unique
societal programs as "ONE CHILD POLICY" or "RE-EDUCATION OF UIGHUR
MUSLIMS" as not being *POGROMS* in and of themselves, but attempts to
preserve the balance of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY against any binomial
mindset onslaught.

Thus it could be argued that since the remark: "DO YOU WANT MORE / LESS"
is capable of being conveyed by a non-offensive gesticulation (the LEFT
HAND or the RIGHT HAND) of the person making the REMARK even though
referencing a specific cultural group, it does there by, give credence
to an implied immoral or unlawful impost made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY which are themselves UNIVERSALLY defined by seven moral
proscriptions as principles of ONTIC necessity and of there being a
criminality by its stubborn non-compliance since it is reasonable to
conclude that if any of these metempirical principles are abrogated then
AUTONOMY will be adversely affected as a consequence:

CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

We conclude therefore that, the determination of the COURT breaches the
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* which is concerned with *AVOIDANCE* *OF*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* and that from a technical perspective
this dichotomy as the binomial ontological characteristic being
incommensurate can in the circumstance of speech only be reasonably
resolved by recourse to the epistemological premise at the ONTIC level.

That is by reference to the #164 - *TEMPORAL* *REVERSE* *TRANSCRIPTASE*
*INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* as its ontological dynamic *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY* and impetus for its circumscribing by a rhetorical
contrivance.

THAT OFFENCE IS CAUSED BY AN APPREHENSION AND DEFICIENCY OF THE PERSON
HEARING THE REMARK FAILING TO PROPERLY COGNIZE ITS REFERENCE AS POINT OF
PERSPECTIVE {eg: as our summation of the KOREAN CRISIS being an implicit
cognition made prior to the spasmodic #315 - *WITHDRAWAL* at the HANOI
summit} IN THE SAME MANNER THAT A REMBRANDT PAINTING HAS A POINT OF
REFERENCE AS PERSPECTIVE.

You can certainly view the painting from any perspective but only by
seeing its TRUE LINE, can the MIND of the ARTIST be properly INTERPRETED."

>
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
   Male: #105; Feme: #32 <-- #105 AS ROMAN HETEROS GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE
#THREE / JEWISH KABBALAH PROTOTYPE #FOUR / #315 - *QUACKING* *DUCKS*
} // #113
   Male: #279; Feme: #153
} // #315
UMBRA: #253 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance;
I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest
thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
    #VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
    #TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artiﬁce.
    #POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
    #TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
    #CANON: #104
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #150; Feme: #104
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
#315 as [#6, #200, #6, #3, #50, #10, #40] = ragan (H7279): {UMBRA: #8 as
#253 % #41 = #7} 1) to murmur, whisper; 1a) (Qal) murmurer (participle);
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to murmur; 1b2) *BACKBITER* (participle);
   Male: #265; Feme: #72
} // #315
UMBRA: #313 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
    #VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
    #POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
    #TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
    #CANON: #168
ANY {%26}),
   Male: #73; Feme: #168
Nature [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
#315 as [#2, #300, #6, #2, #5] = shuwbah (H7729): {UMBRA: #11 as #313 %
#41 = #26} 1) retirement, *WITHDRAWAL*;
   Male: #203; Feme: #153
} // #315
UMBRA: #289 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
   Male: #71; Feme: #84
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
#315 as [#10, #80, #9, #10, #200, #6] = patar (H6362): {UMBRA: #7 as
#289 % #41 = #2} 1) to separate, set free, remove, open, escape, burst
through; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *REMOVE* (*ONESELF*), *ESCAPE*; 1a2) to
set free, let out;
{%13}); Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #139; Feme: #72
} // #315
UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; I indulge not in anger.
    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the inﬁnitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {UMBRA: #14 as #315 % #41 = #28}
1) yet, still; 1a) of time; 1a1) *OF* *A* *THING* *WHICH* *WENT* *ON*
*FORMERLY*, *WHEREAS* *NOW* *A* *DIFFERENT* *STATE* *OF* *THINGS*
*EXISTS* *OR* *HAS* *BEGUN* *TO* *EXIST*; 1a2) of a thing which
continues at present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no
longer, no more; 1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2)
besides, more, further;
   Male: #107; Feme: #32
} // #113
   Male: #109; Feme: #32
} // #113
   Male: #109; Feme: #32
} // #113
UMBRA: #113 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
ENQUIRY) as [#6, #10, #6, #90, #1] / [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] / [#1, #6,
#90, #10, #1, #5] / [#10, #6, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): {UMBRA: #41
as #113 % #41 = #31} 1) to go out, come out, exit, go forth; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to go or come out or forth, depart; 1a2) to go forth (to a place);
1a3) to go forward, proceed to (to or toward something); 1a4) to come or
go forth (with purpose or for result); 1a5) to come out of; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to go or come out, bring out, lead out; 1b2) to
bring out of; 1b3) to lead out; 1b4) to deliver; 1c) (Hophal) to be
brought out or forth;
agreement is independent of any sanctions deductions or goals for
diminishing nuclear weapons capacity.
What I desire to know is how North Korea 🇰🇵 intends to harness its
nuclear research for the development of a sustainable electricity supply
/ satellite based technology because without which any realisation of
potential for economic prosperity would be impossible.
If it takes 80% of the Korean nation’s scientific resources to achieve
such “potential for economic prosperity” then ipso facto there is a
“diminished nuclear weapons capacity”
My view (it’s not the first time that I have raised the electricity
supply scenario) is that the participants had not prepared sufficiently
to even be able to adopt any STATIC MECHANICS OF PROSPERITY which ought
to have been RATIFIED at the HANOI SUMMIT by A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING and then formalised at a mutually beneficial time at a
later date.
And now countries like Vietnam have lost face."
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #299; Feme: #167
} // #491
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
    #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
    #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
    #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
    #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own ﬂesh and blood.
    #CANON: #220
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
   Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as
#491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489
% #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaph.; 3) God is called
the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the corporeal
nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote ancestor, the
founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a people, forefather: so
Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie. ancestors,
forefathers, founders of a race; 1c) one advanced in years, a senior;
2a) the originator and transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors of a
family or society of persons animated by the same spirit as himself;
2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who actuates and
governs their minds; 2b) one who stands in a father's place and looks
after another in a paternal way; 2c) a title of honour; 2c1) teachers,
as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training they have
received; 2c2) the members of the Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by
virtue of the wisdom and experience in which they excelled, to take
charge of the interests of others; 3a) of the stars, the heavenly
luminaries, because he is their creator, upholder, ruler; 3b) of all
rational and intelligent beings, whether angels or men, because he is
their creator, preserver, guardian and protector; 3b1) of spiritual
beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ
have been exalted to a specially close and intimate relationship with
God, and who no longer dread him as a stern judge of sinners, but revere
him as their reconciled and loving Father; 3d) the Father of Jesus
Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest bond of
love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes, appointed to
explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation, and made to share
also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*;
3d2) by the apostles;
with the "QUACK OF DUCKS" conveyed by the insubstantial pernicious
opinions of his untrustworthy legal counsel MICHAEL COHEN {ie. the name
itself is a reprobation of Jewish piety}.
Since I am speaking only to this point (ie. the statements of legal
counsel are outside his domain of accountability) regarding the UNITED
STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN of 2018–2019 occurred from midnight
EST on 22 DECEMBER 2018 until 25 JANUARY 2019 (35 days). It was the
longest U.S. government shutdown in history, and the second federal
government shutdown involving furloughs during the presidency of Donald
Trump.
In our view as assessment made prior to the announced intention as
cessation of this unprecedented FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN and the
exact foretelling of its CONCLUSION, that this process was necessary to
properly demarcate the persistent substance being #491 - PRINCIPLE OF
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
Such clarification of AUTHORITY / POWER by the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES in our opinion was essential to the undertaking of any
FOUNDATIONAL TRILATERAL PEACE ACCORD between NORTH / SOUTH KOREA and the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which as STATIC MECHANICS OF PROSPERITY we
anticipated being RATIFIED at the HANOI SUMMIT by A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING and then formalised at a mutually beneficial time at a
later date.
For Koreans, mandarin ducks represent peace, fidelity, and plentiful
offspring. Similar to the Chinese, they believe that these ducks mate
for life. For these reasons, pairs of mandarin ducks called wedding
ducks are often given as wedding gifts and play a significant role in
Korean marriage. [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarin_duck>]
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE
EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
   Male: #246: GOAL, OBJECT, PURPOSE, INTENTION: AD PROVIDAM {#6 - TO
FORESEE / FOR PROVIDENCE} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (BINOMIAL
/ BIFURCATED) THEORY OF NUMBER; Feme: #231: JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
} // #474
#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC
PROGRESSION) [#3, #10, #50, #800, #200, #20, #5, #300, #800] / #474 as
[#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as #1883 %
#41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;
Again we have recourse to MATTERS relating to an INFORMAL OPINION AS
RESPONSE MADE TO THE DUTCH COURT'S JUDGMENT AGAINST THE POLITICIAN GEERT
WILDERS which was then AS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE then DISTORTED AS FACTS
BY PERJURED OATHS then raised as the INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 which was determined by the SALE
MAGISTRATES COURT ON 11 JANUARY 2018 as being a HABITUAL PERVERSE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY SUSPECTED ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY
NEOPHYTES BEING AN ABSOLUTE AS CONTEMPT FOR THE #873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL associated with QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE INITIATING SITUATION OCCURRING 15 DECEMBER,
2016 WHICH HAS NOW ESCALATED TO AN INDICTMENT OF TREASON BEING MADE
CAFE (paraphrased): "Why did you put this rubbish on our CAFE Facebook
Page?"
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of
compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning "MANLY, STRONG" ...
Why should you, in relation to what things are mine and not yours, then
dictate what ought to be on my mind?
Such rubbish as YOU CALL IT because of your abject ignorance which you
make despite the absolute command given under SECTION VIII of the
Letters Patent to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING* *AND* *ASSISTING*", can earn
you a criminal charge of TREASON and 25 years imprisonment (if I wish to
pursue that matter against you), as a contempt of your life and business
towards the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN
PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of
the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Why did you celebrate Christmas with a lunch on this 14th December, 2016
when are you given to such hypocrisy and depravity of being with no
claim that you can make of *JESUS* *CHRIST* *AS* *YOU* *ARE* *A*
*HYPOCRITE* *AND* *A* *GODLESS* *LIAR*?
Stick to croissants and coffee--but leave the things which are mine to
my concern.
DOLF: "Who was it who wrote those ignorant comments in relation to my
attendance here yesterday?"
CAFE: "I want you to leave my business now or I will call the police."
[Showed a contemptuous disdain by a backhanded flicking refuse away
DOLF (paraphrase): "That is fine by me.
Because whether it is yourself, POLLYANNAR BIG PICTURE PHOTOGRAPHER or
REDD CATT CAFE, I will neither keep the company with fascist whores nor
to transact any business with those who come here to this country so as
to show such disrespect for the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES of our COMMONWEALTH.
You cannot thereby claim any piety, specially Christian identity (but
not limited to), your house is now desolate and anyone who does business
with you will now similarly lose their prospect of eternity."
"AND HE CAUSETH ALL, BOTH SMALL AND GREAT, RICH AND POOR, FREE AND BOND,
TO RECEIVE A MARK IN THEIR RIGHT HAND, OR IN THEIR FOREHEADS: AND THAT
NO MAN MIGHT BUY OR SELL, SAVE HE THAT HAD THE MARK, OR THE NAME OF THE
BEAST, OR THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME. HERE IS WISDOM. LET HIM THAT HATH
UNDERSTANDING COUNT THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST: FOR IT IS THE NUMBER OF A
MAN; AND HIS NUMBER IS SIX HUNDRED THREESCORE AND SIX (#666)."
[Revelation 13:14-18 (KJV)]
DOLF: "Go back to where you came from."
have reported you and I will take out an intervention order against you
if you persist in this manner."
been entirely in compliance with NATURE, LAW, ORDER and the JUSTICE of
this LAND as SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES which are defined by a Natural /
Common Law statement as to the existence of an egalitarian right and
that was in accord with such mathematical theoretical noumenon as
Intellectual Property of mine, and with specific regard to the computed
#287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): 1)
necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected
by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO*
*THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*
As that which was required as action of mindful compliance given by you
in the circumstances AS MY LAWFUL demand granted in the prudent and
reasonable exercise of MY PREROGATIVE AS AUTHORITY made in regard to a
submission given to SECTION VIII of the Letters Patent as defining the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES
encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Should your improper, impertinent, unrepentant and bellicose as
threatening public conduct such as this statement: "I will take out an
intervention order against you if you persist in this manner" continue.
I will recommend to the magistrate that a charge of TREASON pursuant to
Section 9A of the Crimes Act (1958) Victoria be brought against you and
that all the necessary documents relative to any successful prosecution
to the charge (as referenced here) have been already served on you.
I will bring your fascist conduct therefore into a proper mindfulness of
contrition and a duty before the law.
Do you understand that?"
PREAMBLE AS NOTICE GIVEN TO THE SALE MAGISTRATES COURT ON 11 JANUARY
2016 OF AN IMPENDING INDICTMENT
1.    These are the material details of Complaint as an Indictment for
"Crimes Against Humanity as War Crimes Constituting Treason" which is
now made to the Sale Magistrates Court on this day of 11 January, 2017
and provided prior to such Court of competent legal jurisdiction,
' I AM NOW INTENT ON PROCEEDING WITH THE TABLING OF A COMPLAINT TO YOU
ALL OF "CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY" AS "WAR CRIMES" CONSTITUTING TREASON'
of 1952 HOURS on 3 January, 2017
'THIS IS A NOTICE OF AN IMPENDING INDICTMENT FOR "CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY" AS "WAR CRIMES" CONSTITUTING TREASON' of 0834 HOURS on 5
January, 2017
2.    And which was made to the following persons, specific interest
- Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission
- Police Ethical Standards and Conduct Unit
SINCE I CONTINUE TO BE SUBJECT TO IRRATIONAL #419 - IMPOSTS MADE UPON MY
AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202 ARE
PRESENTLY BEFORE THE COURTS, A CULTURAL DENIAL (25 YEARS) FAIR POLICING,
LACK OF VIABLE AND WILLING LEGAL REPRESENTATION (THE VICTORIAN JUDICIAL
SYSTEM IS CORRUPT) AND UNBIASED COURT JUDGMENTS, ACCORDINGLY *I* *AM*
*PUBLICLY* *CONVEYING* *MY* *INTENTION* *TO* *SEEK* *POLITICAL* *ASYLUM*
*AND* *RETAINING* *TO* *OURSELVES* *SUCH* *SAPIENT* *TECHNOLOGY* *AS*
*INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *THEREBY**REDUCING* *THE* *AUSTRALIAN*
*COMMONWEALTH*, *THE* *NATION* *AND* *THE* *AUTONOMY* *OF* *ITS*
*PEOPLE* *TO* *A* *QUARRY* *OF* *OPPORTUNISM* *FOR* *RESOURCES* *BY*
*ANOTHER* *SOVEREIGNTY*.
THERE IS NO HOSPITABLE LIFE TO BE ENJOYED WITHIN THIS COUNTRY.
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]
strikes at the very heart of Dutch Justice against the sovereign
'DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF THESE FUCK KNUCKLE REPROBATE ISLAMISTS?'
By such is demanded that the weighty matter as trinomial SCALES OF
JUSTICE are firstly placed within a PROPER BALANCE by the COURT before
#523 as [#5, #200, #300, #1, #9, #8] = histemi (G2476): {UMBRA: #35 as
#523 % #41 = #31} 1) to cause or make to stand, to place, put, set; 2)
to stand; 1a) *TO* *BID* *TO* *STAND* *BY*, [*SET* *UP*]; 1a1) *IN*
*THE* *PRESENCE* *OF* *OTHERS*, *IN* *THE* *MIDST*, *BEFORE* *JUDGES*,
before members of the Sanhedrin;; 1a2) to place; 1b) to make firm, fix
establish; 1b1) to cause a person or a thing to keep his or its place;
1b2) *TO* *STAND*, *BE* *KEPT* *INTACT* (*OF* *FAMILY*, *A* *KINGDOM*),
*TO* *ESCAPE* *IN* *SAFETY*; 1b3) *TO* *ESTABLISH* *A* *THING*, *CAUSE*
*IT* *TO* *STAND*; 1b31) *TO* *UPHOLD* *OR* *SUSTAIN* *THE* *AUTHORITY*
*OR* *FORCE* *OF* *ANYTHING*; 1c) *TO* *SET* *OR* *PLACE* *IN* *A*
*BALANCE*; 1c1) to weigh: money to one (because in very early times
before the introduction of coinage, the metals used to be weighed); 2a)
to stand by or near; 2a1) to stop, stand still, to stand immovable,
stand firm; 2a1a) of the foundation of a building; 2b) to stand; 2b1)
*CONTINUE* *SAFE* *AND* *SOUND*, *STAND* *UNHARMED*, *TO* *STAND*
*READY* *OR* *PREPARED*; 2b2) to be of a steadfast mind; 2b3) of
quality, one who does not hesitate, does not waiver;
And the court be not unduly prejudiced in any lesser or more degree by
the circumstance of irreconcilable dichotomies of sensibility and
circumscribing reality by those which have recourse to a binomial
methodology for professing there are only two sides to a coin. My client
GEERT WILDERS is innocent of the obscenity which is here Dutch Justice.
Mangoes Rice & Cream
PS. This is a parody and such travesty is lawful when artistic merit is
claimed”
respectful objection (ie. as then INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016) made of the DUTCH JUDICATORY'S
DETERMINATION AGAINST POLITICIAN GEERT WILDERS ISLAMIC DEFAMATION which
we have always maintained (ie. within 24 hours of its determinations and
our intuition conveyed then has been hereby ratified is the impost upon
the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic) is against the notional binomial
dichotomy of a MORE / LESS construct is that the regime of piety defines
its nomenclature of belief as an antagonism made against autonomy itself.
Realizing that from our informal analysis made of the VOC experience
having recourse to Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 which has cognition
of TRINOMIAL NUMBER) such antagonism against autonomy itself being in
this instance an absconded sailor, we recognize by the NATURE of the
dialog conforming to implicit and exacting CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
which itself frames our knowledge of there being a TRINOMIAL paradigm
capable by REASON of unambiguously and equitably defining SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY, that the capacity for VOC as an organisation to function with
the traditional binomial notion of STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE is in all
probability due to such TRINOMIAL PARADIGM / BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY being
capable of an orbital and sub-ordinate characteristic of STATEHOOD.
The concern over the MORE / LESS binary construct is that by there being
an implied antagonism against AUTONOMY itself as an attribution of
STATEHOOD {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN}, it is thereby inferring a TRINOMIAL
construct and a consideration is then made in juxtaposition to a regime
of piety which defines itself by a binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic
as its nomenclature against a principle of STATE which is itself defined
as a trinomial construct of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.
I make the further observation that any postulation made of the binomial
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic which has an embodiment within the #325 -
IDEA of it being accomplished by a CANONICAL TRANSPOSITION (ie. BINOMIAL
EIGHT {
#1 + #2 = #3;
#3 + #4 = #7;
#5 + #6 = #11;
#7 + #8 = #15
AS TOTALLING #36 WITH A MAGIC SUM #111 / #666
} ELEMENT METATHESIS OF TRANSPOSITION AGAINST NINE ELEMENT TRINOMIAL
NUMBER AS EXHIBITING AN #65 / #260 (#64 ELEMENTS) ANALOGY WITH #1
RETENTION) as an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD proposition made against the
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
In having an historical precedent as the characteristic of EUNUCHS both
in the embodiment of criminal punishment / loss of autonomy such as the
instance of WANG FU (eunuch) within the HAN DYNASTY (206 BCE to 220 CE)
which is exhibited by the story in 172 CE, when EMPRESS DOWAGER DOU MIAO
'ALL THAT IS UNDER THE HEAVEN IS IN UPHEAVAL.
CAO AND WANG MURDERED THE EMPRESS DOWAGER.
THE KEY OFFICIALS ONLY KNOW HOW TO BE OFFICIALS AND HAD NOTHING FAITHFUL
TO SAY.' [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Fu_(eunuch)>]
FROM SLAVES TO POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS
Eunuchs, or 'non-men' as they could be known, first appeared in the
royal courts of ancient pre-imperial Chinese states where they were
employed as servants in the inner chambers of the palace. They were more
or less slaves and were usually acquired as children from border
territories, especially those to the south. Castrated and brought to
serve the royal household, they had no real means of altering their
lives. Eunuchs were *REGARDED* *AS* *THE* *MOST* *TRUSTWORTHY* *OF*
*SERVANTS* *BECAUSE* *THEY* *COULD* *NEITHER* *SEDUCE* *WOMEN* *OF*
*THE* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *FATHER* *CHILDREN* *WHICH* *MIGHT* *FORM* *A*
*DYNASTY* to rival that of the sitting emperor’s.
Eunuchs were powerful political players in ancient Chinese government.
Originating as trusted slaves in the royal household they were ambitious
to use their favoured position to gain political power. Advising the
emperor from within the palace and blocking the access of officials to
their ruler, the eunuchs were eventually able to acquire noble titles
themselves, form a bureaucracy to rival the state’s and even select and
remove emperors of their choosing. Their influence on government would
result in the falling of dynasties and last right up to the 17th century
CE.
Very often the eunuchs encouraged and made worse political factions,
which damaged the unity of the government. Eunuchs are charged with
playing a major part in the fall of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE).
During the 2nd century CE, in particular, a succession of weak emperors
were easily manipulated by the eunuchs at court. In 124 CE they even put
their own child candidate on the imperial throne. They gained more
imperial favour and further entrenched their position in 159 CE by
helping Emperor Huan settle a family succession dispute. In gratitude,
the emperor awarded a noble title to five leading eunuchs.
The eunuchs’ even greater power ultimately resulted in government
officials and students banding together and staging protests in 166 and
168-169 CE. The eunuchs would not be put off so lightly though and they
instigated a wave of purges which saw many of those involved in the
protests imprisoned and 100 executed. The luckier officials, students,
and intellectuals who had spoken out against eunuch power were merely
excluded from ever holding public office. In 189 CE events took an even
more brutal turn. The eunuchs murdered the 'Grand General' He Jin after
it was discovered he had plotted to assemble an army to himself purge
the eunuchs. The general’s followers exacted immediate revenge by
killing all the eunuchs in the palace. With this power vacuum there then
ensued a civil war for control of the empire, with the result that the
Han fell and the Wei dynasty was established in 220 CE.
[<https://www.ancient.eu/article/1109/eunuchs-in-ancient-china/>]
Thus given such a history of identity as the capacity for antagonisms
against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY why then there should naturally emerge
from such conflicted national identity such societal programs as "ONE
CHILD POLICY" or "RE-EDUCATION OF UIGHUR MUSLIMS" as not being *POGROMS*
but attempts to preserve the balance of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY against any
binomial mindset onslaught.
Thus it could be argued that since the remark: "DO YOU WANT MORE / LESS"
is capable of being conveyed by a non-offensive gesticulation (the LEFT
HAND or the RIGHT HAND) of the person making the REMARK even though
referencing a specific cultural group, it does there by give credence to
an implied immoral or unlawful impost made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY which are themselves UNIVERSALLY defined by seven moral
proscriptions as principles of ONTIC necessity and of there being a
criminality by its non-compliance since it is reasonable to conclude
that if any of these metempirical principles are abrogated then AUTONOMY
CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE*
*SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
We conclude therefore that, the determination of the COURT breaches the
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY which is concerned with *AVOIDANCE* *OF*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* and that from a technical perspective
this dichotomy as the binomial ontological characteristic being
incommensurate can in the circumstance of speech only be reasonably
resolved by recourse to the epistemological premise at the ontic level.
That is by reference to the temporal reverse transcriptase inhibitor as
impetus for its circumscribing as a rhetorical contrivance.
THAT OFFENCE IS CAUSED BY AN APPREHENSION AND DEFICIENCY OF THE PERSON
HEARING THE REMARK FAILING TO PROPERLY COGNIZE ITS REFERENCE AS POINT OF
PERSPECTIVE IN THE SAME MANNER THAT A REMBRANDT PAINTING HAS A POINT OF
REFERENCE AS PERSPECTIVE.
You can certainly view the painting from any perspective but only by
seeing its TRUE LINE, can the MIND of the ARTIST be properly INTERPRETED."
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#114),
IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
    Male: #280; Feme: #225
} // #873
UMBRA: #94 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
    #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
    #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
    #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
    #CANON: #148
   Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN
VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
TO BE CONTINUED ...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%204%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
Initial Post: 10 December 2018

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

2019-03-02 22:18:09 UTC

Permalink

IT TAKES TIME TO POLISH ANY ARGUMENT AND SO HERE IS THE NEXT REVISION...

The *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*, *NAMELY*
*THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING*, and accordingly from achieving a
rule-governed and necessary table (Critique, p. 292).

*THIS* *VERY* *SYSTEM*, *LIKE* *EVERY* *TRUE* *SYSTEM* *FOUNDED* *ON*
*AN* *UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLE* [IDEA: @326] {eg:

SELF-JUSTIFICATION:

#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE*
*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS
22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC PROPOSITION:
#902 - RULE OF LAW *WHICH* *IS* *NOT* *TO* *BE* *FOUND* *WITHIN* *THE*
*COMMONWEALTH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* *AND* *CONCERNING* *WHICH* *THERE* *IS*
*NEVER* *TO* *BE* *ANY* *FORGIVENESS* *OF* *SOUL*.

#400 AS *RATIONALITY* *OF* *SPEECH* MINUS #205 AS *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* = #195 - *TO* *MAINTAIN* *ONESELF*; *TO* *BE*
*ESTABLISHED*, *BE* *CONFIRMED*; *TO* *STAND*, *ENDURE*;

YOUTUBE: "Time To Say Goodbye (Andrea Bocelli, Sarah Brightman)"

http://youtu.be/4L_yCwFD6Jo

"And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus {#236 as [#1, #100,
#5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, saying, May we
know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?" [Acts 17:19 (KJV)]

"Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70,
#50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus} hill {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10,
#70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, and said, Ye men of Athens,
I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious." [Acts 17:22 (KJV)]

#400 AS *RATIONALITY* *OF* *SPEECH* MINUS #164 AS *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY* = #236 - *AREUM* *JUDICIUM* *AN* *CURIA* (*THE* *AREA*
*OF* *JUDGES* / *SENATE* *OR* *MEETING* *HOUSE*): MARS HILL ATHENS
WHERE THE APOSTLE PAUL WAS NOT LED TO DEFEND HIMSELF BEFORE JUDGES, BUT
THAT HE MIGHT *SET* *FORTH* *HIS* *OPINIONS* *ON* *DIVINE* *SUBJECTS* TO
A GREATER MULTITUDE OF PEOPLE, FLOCKING TOGETHER THERE AND EAGER TO HEAR
SOMETHING NEW:

YOUTUBE: "Don't Cry for Me Argentina (Elaine Paige)"

http://youtu.be/ciOalICSUAo

"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any
twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and
spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts
and intents {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771):
intent} of the heart." [Hebrews 4:12 (KJV)]

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm
yourselves likewise with the same mind {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10,
#1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): intent}: for he that hath suffered in the
flesh hath ceased from sin;" [1Peter 4:1 (KJV)]

H6965@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 24 (#29); Ego: 19 (#24),
   @3: Sup: 64 (#93); Ego: 40 (#64),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#167); Ego: 10 (#74),
   @5: Sup: 26 (#193); Ego: 33 (#107),
   Male: #193; Feme: #107
} // #195

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #195 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#195 as [#5, #100, #40, #10, #600] = quwm (H6965): {UMBRA: #8 as #195 %
#41 = #31} 1) to rise, arise, stand, rise up, stand up; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to arise; 1a2) to arise (hostile sense); 1a3) to arise, become powerful;
1a4) to arise, come on the scene; 1a5) to stand; 1a5a) to maintain
oneself; 1a5b) to be established, be confirmed; 1a5c) to stand, endure;
1a5d) to be fixed; 1a5e) to be valid; 1a5f) to be proven; 1a5g) to be
fulfilled; 1a5h) to persist; 1a5i) to be set, be fixed; 1b) (Piel); 1b1)
to fulfil; 1b2) to confirm, ratify, establish, impose; 1c) (Polel) to
raise up; 1d) (Hithpael) to raise oneself, rise up; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1)
to cause to arise, raise; 1e2) to raise, set up, erect, build; 1e3) to
raise up, bring on the scene; 1e4) to raise up, rouse, stir up,
investigate; 1e5) to raise up, constitute; 1e6) to cause to stand, set,
station, establish; 1e7) to make binding; 1e8) to carry out, give effect
to; 1f) (Hophal) to be raised up;

G697@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#46); Ego: 5 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#81); Ego: 10 (#35),
   @5: Sup: 24 (#105); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @6: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 50 (#155),
   Male: #179; Feme: #155
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #386 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): {UMBRA: #16
as #386 % #41 = #17} 1) a rocky height in the city of Athens, opposite
the western end of the Acropolis toward the west. This hill belonged to
(Ares) Mars and was called Mar's Hill; so called, because, as the story
went, Mars, having slain Halirrhothius, son of Neptune, for the
attempted violation of his daughter Alicippe, was tried for the murder
here before twelve gods as judges. This place was the location where the
judges convened who, by appointment of Solon, had jurisdiction of
capital offences, (as wilful murder, arson, poisoning, malicious
wounding, and breach of established religious usages). The court itself
was called Areopagus from the place where it sat, also Areum judicium an
curia. To that hill the apostle Paul was not led to defend himself
before judges, but that he might set forth his opinions on divine
subjects to a greater multitude of people, flocking together there and
eager to hear something new;

G1771@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
   @3: Sup: 24 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 50 (#105),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#97); Ego: 70 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   @5: Sup: 23 (#120); Ego: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
   @6: Sup: 24 (#144); Ego: 1 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @7: Sup: 74 (#218); Ego: 50 (#236),
   Male: #218; Feme: #236
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): {UMBRA: #18
as #186 % #41 = #22} 1) the act of thinking, consideration, meditation;
2) a thought, notion, conception; 3) *MIND*, *UNDERSTANDING*, *WILL*,
*MANNER* *OF* *FEELING*, *AND* *THINKING*;

YOUTUBE: "Sarah Brightman and Antonio Banderas in Royal Albert Hall (The
Phantom Of The Opera)"

}, *ALSO* *EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT*
*EXPELS* *ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE*
*CREEP* *IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING*, *AND* *IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*.
Those concepts that, under the name of concepts of reflection, I had
also put into a table under the guidance of the categories mingle in
ontology with the pure concepts of the understanding without privilege
and legitimate claims, although the latter are concepts of connection
and thereby of the object itself, whereas the former are only concepts
of the mere comparison of already given concepts, and therefore have an
entirely different nature and use; through my law-governed division
(Critique, p. 260) they are extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a
completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of
metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

TOTAL: @166 + @168 + @169 + @171 + @173 + @175 + @177 + @180 + @181 +
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {

@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “It’s a rhetorical question which
strikes at the very heart of Dutch Justice against the sovereign
autonomy of its people as criteria of existence:

'DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF THESE FUCK KNUCKLE REPROBATE ISLAMISTS?'

By such is demanded that the weighty matter as trinomial SCALES OF
JUSTICE are firstly placed within a PROPER BALANCE by the COURT before
any consideration is determined:

#523 as [#5, #200, #300, #1, #9, #8] = histemi (G2476): {UMBRA: #35 as
#523 % #41 = #31} 1) to cause or make to stand, to place, put, set; 2)
to stand; 1a) *TO* *BID* *TO* *STAND* *BY*, [*SET* *UP*]; 1a1) *IN*
*THE* *PRESENCE* *OF* *OTHERS*, *IN* *THE* *MIDST*, *BEFORE* *JUDGES*,
before members of the Sanhedrin;; 1a2) to place; 1b) to make firm, fix
establish; 1b1) to cause a person or a thing to keep his or its place;
1b2) *TO* *STAND*, *BE* *KEPT* *INTACT* (*OF* *FAMILY*, *A* *KINGDOM*),
*TO* *ESCAPE* *IN* *SAFETY*; 1b3) *TO* *ESTABLISH* *A* *THING*, *CAUSE*
*IT* *TO* *STAND*; 1b31) *TO* *UPHOLD* *OR* *SUSTAIN* *THE* *AUTHORITY*
*OR* *FORCE* *OF* *ANYTHING*; 1c) *TO* *SET* *OR* *PLACE* *IN* *A*
*BALANCE*; 1c1) to weigh: money to one (because in very early times
before the introduction of coinage, the metals used to be weighed); 2a)
to stand by or near; 2a1) to stop, stand still, to stand immovable,
stand firm; 2a1a) of the foundation of a building; 2b) to stand; 2b1)
*CONTINUE* *SAFE* *AND* *SOUND*, *STAND* *UNHARMED*, *TO* *STAND*
*READY* *OR* *PREPARED*; 2b2) to be of a steadfast mind; 2b3) of
quality, one who does not hesitate, does not waiver;

And the court be not unduly prejudiced in any lesser or more degree by
the circumstance of irreconcilable dichotomies of sensibility and
circumscribing reality by those which have recourse to a binomial
methodology for professing there are only two sides to a coin. My client
GEERT WILDERS is innocent of the obscenity which is here Dutch Justice.

Mangoes Rice & Cream

PS. This is a parody and such travesty is lawful when artistic merit is
claimed”

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “The point of such goodwill as
respectful objection (ie. as then INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER IN
CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016) made of the DUTCH
JUDICATORY'S ADVERSE DETERMINATION AGAINST POLITICIAN GEERT WILDERS
ISLAMIC DEFAMATION which we have always maintained (ie. within 24 hours
of its determinations and our intuition conveyed then has been hereby
ratified is the impost upon the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic) is against
the notional binomial dichotomy of a MORE / LESS construct is that the
regime of piety defines its nomenclature of belief as an antagonism made
against autonomy itself.

Realizing that from our informal analysis made of the VOC experience
against Captain James Cook @ BATAVIA on 25 December 1770 (and later
having recourse to Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 which has cognition
of TRINOMIAL NUMBER) such antagonism against autonomy itself being in
this instance an absconded sailor, we recognize by the NATURE of the
dialog conforming to implicit and exacting CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
which itself frames our knowledge of there being a TRINOMIAL paradigm
capable by REASON of unambiguously and equitably defining SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY, that the capacity for VOC as an organisation to function with
the traditional binomial notion of STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE is in all
probability due to such TRINOMIAL PARADIGM / BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY being
capable of an orbital and sub-ordinate characteristic of STATEHOOD.

The concern over the MORE / LESS binary construct is that by there being
an implied antagonism against AUTONOMY itself as an attribution of
STATEHOOD {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN}, it is thereby inferring a TRINOMIAL
construct and a consideration is then made in juxtaposition to a regime
of piety which defines itself by a binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic
as its nomenclature against a principle of STATE which is itself defined
as a trinomial construct of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA #325: "Finally, I related
these functions of judging to objects in general, or rather to the
condition [IDEA: @324] for determining judgments as objectively valid,
and there arose pure concepts of the understanding, about which I could
have no doubt that precisely these only, and of them only so many,
*NEITHER* *MORE* *NOR* *FEWER*, can make up our entire cognition of
things out of the bare understanding. As was proper, I called them
categories, after their ancient name, whereby I reserved for myself to
append in full, under the name of predicables, all the concepts
derivable from them – whether by connecting them with one another, or
with the pure form of appearance (space and time), or with its matter,
provided the latter is not yet determined empirically (the object of
sensation in general) – just as soon as a system of transcendental
philosophy should be achieved, on behalf of which I had, at the time,
been concerned only with the critique of reason itself.

NOTE: What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or
value systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of
the world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a
set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.  Each level of cultural and human development
represents a value system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a
meme. Just as genes carry the informational codes for our biological
DNA, these value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with
“themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs,
values, common ways of looking at the world that, like contagious
viruses, spread from brain to brain through word of mouth, through
media, through interaction between people. The third angel’s message is
a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the world with the
divine virus of the gospel.  There are more than 6 billion people in the
world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we
share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this
topic have identified only eight thus far.

But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2
{#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17
SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can colour-code
them (Figure A).

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>

[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]

When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).  Notice how the Focus
column alternates between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours)
and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the
differences people value the most in each system as they flow from
survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to raw power and
instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies
for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to alternative
forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural
form (Coral).

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL) ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of development in
this chart or any other useful one, for the ideal that God sets before
us is “higher than the highest human thought can reach.” [Courtesy:
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How Cultural
Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]

The essential thing, however, in this system of categories, by which it
is distinguished from that ancient rhapsody (which proceeded without any
principle), and in virtue of which it alone deserves to be counted as
philosophy, consists in this: that through it the *TRUE* *SIGNIFICATION*
*OF* *THE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* and the
condition of their use could be exactly determined. For here it became
apparent that the pure concepts of the understanding are, of themselves,
nothing but logical functions, but that as such they do not constitute
the least concept of an object in itself but rather need sensory
intuition as a basis, and even then they serve only to determine
empirical judgments – which are otherwise undetermined and indifferent
with respect to all the functions of judging – with respect to those
functions, so as to procure universal validity for these judgments, and
thereby to make judgments of experience possible in general.

This sort of insight into the nature of the categories, which would at
the same time restrict their use merely to experience, never occurred to
their first originator, or to anyone after him; but *WITHOUT* *THIS*
*INSIGHT* (*WHICH* *DEPENDS* *PRECISELY* *ON* *THEIR* *DERIVATION* *OR*
*DEDUCTION*), they are completely useless and are a paltry list of
names, without explanation or rule for their use. *HAD* *ANYTHING*
*LIKE* *IT* *EVER* *OCCURRED* *TO* *THE* *ANCIENTS*, *THEN* *WITHOUT*
*DOUBT* *THE* *ENTIRE* *STUDY* *OF* *COGNITION* *THROUGH* *PURE*
*REASON*, which under the name of metaphysics has ruined so many good
minds over the centuries, would have come down to us in a *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *FORM* *AND* *WOULD* [IDEA: @325] *HAVE* *ENLIGHTENED* *THE*
*HUMAN* *UNDERSTANDING*, instead of, as has actually happened,
exhausting it in murky and vain ruminations and making it unserviceable
for true science.

This system of categories now makes all treatment of any object of pure
reason itself systematic in turn, and it yields an undoubted instruction
or guiding thread as to how and through what points of inquiry any
metaphysical contemplation must be directed if it is to be complete; for
it exhausts all moments of the understanding, under which every other
concept must be brought. Thus too has arisen the table of principles, of
whose completeness we can be assured only through the system of
categories; and even in the division of concepts that are supposed to go
beyond the physiological use of the understanding (Critique, p. 344,
also p. 415), there is always the same guiding thread, which, since it
always must be taken through the same fixed points determined a priori
in the human understanding, forms a closed circle every time, leaving no
room for doubt that the object of a pure concept of the understanding or
reason, insofar as it is to be examined philosophically and according to
a priori principles, can be cognized completely in this way. I have not
even been able to refrain from making use of this guide with respect to
one of the *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*,
*NAMELY* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING*, and accordingly from achieving a
rule-governed and necessary table (Critique, p. 292).

*THIS* *VERY* *SYSTEM*, *LIKE* *EVERY* *TRUE* *SYSTEM* *FOUNDED* *ON*
*A* *UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLE* [IDEA: @326] {eg: #277 - *RIGHT* *TO*
*PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY*}, *ALSO*
*EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT* *EXPELS*
*ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE* *CREEP*
*IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, *AND*
*IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*. Those concepts that,
under the name of concepts of reflection, I had also put into a table
under the guidance of the categories mingle in ontology with the pure
concepts of the understanding without privilege and legitimate claims,
although the latter are concepts of connection and thereby of the object
itself, whereas the former are only concepts of the mere comparison of
already given concepts, and therefore have an entirely different nature
and use; through my law-governed division (Critique, p. 260) they are
extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a
completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of
metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

I make the further observation that any postulation made of the binomial
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic which has an embodiment within the IDEA
#325 - *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*, *NAMELY*
*THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING* of it being accomplished by a CANONICAL
TRANSPOSITION {ie.

BINOMIAL EIGHT:

#1 + #2 = #3;
#3 + #4 = #7;
#5 + #6 = #11;
#7 + #8 = #15

AS TOTALLING #36 WITH A MAGIC SUM OF #111 / #666

ELEMENT METATHESIS OF TRANSPOSITION MADE AGAINST THE NINE ELEMENT
TRINOMIAL NUMBER AS EXHIBITING AN #65 / #260 (#64 ELEMENTS) ANALOGY AS
WITH AN #1 RETENTION

} as an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD proposition made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY:

@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

In having an historical precedent as the characteristic of EUNUCHS both
in the embodiment of criminal punishment and loss of autonomy such as in
the instance of WANG FU (eunuch) during the HAN DYNASTY (206 BCE to 220
CE) which is exhibited by the story in 172 CE, when EMPRESS DOWAGER DOU
MIAO died, an unknown vandal wrote on the palace door:

'ALL THAT IS UNDER THE HEAVEN IS IN UPHEAVAL.
CAO AND WANG MURDERED THE EMPRESS DOWAGER.
THE KEY OFFICIALS ONLY KNOW HOW TO BE OFFICIALS,
AND HAD NOTHING FAITHFUL TO SAY.'
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Fu_(eunuch)>]

FROM SLAVES TO POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS
Eunuchs, or 'non-men' as they could be known, first appeared in the
royal courts of ancient pre-imperial Chinese states where they were
employed as servants in the inner chambers of the palace. They were more
or less slaves and were usually acquired as children from border
territories, especially those to the south. Castrated and brought to
serve the royal household, they had no real means of altering their
lives. Eunuchs were *REGARDED* *AS* *THE* *MOST* *TRUSTWORTHY* *OF*
*SERVANTS* *BECAUSE* *THEY* *COULD* *NEITHER* *SEDUCE* *WOMEN* *OF*
*THE* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *FATHER* *CHILDREN* *WHICH* *MIGHT* *FORM* *A*
*DYNASTY* to rival that of the sitting emperor’s.

Eunuchs were powerful political players in ancient Chinese government.
Originating as trusted slaves in the royal household they were ambitious
to use their favoured position to gain political power. Advising the
emperor from within the palace and blocking the access of officials to
their ruler, the eunuchs were eventually able to acquire noble titles
themselves, form a bureaucracy to rival the state’s and even select and
remove emperors of their choosing. Their influence on government would
result in the falling of dynasties and last right up to the 17th century CE.

Very often the eunuchs encouraged and made worse political factions,
which damaged the unity of the government. Eunuchs are charged with
playing a major part in the fall of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE).
During the 2nd century CE, in particular, a succession of weak emperors
were easily manipulated by the eunuchs at court. In 124 CE they even put
their own child candidate on the imperial throne. They gained more
imperial favour and further entrenched their position in 159 CE by
helping Emperor Huan settle a family succession dispute. In gratitude,
the emperor awarded a noble title to five leading eunuchs.

The eunuchs’ even greater power ultimately resulted in government
officials and students banding together and staging protests in 166 and
168-169 CE. The eunuchs would not be put off so lightly though and they
instigated a wave of purges which saw many of those involved in the
protests imprisoned and 100 executed. The luckier officials, students,
and intellectuals who had spoken out against eunuch power were merely
excluded from ever holding public office. In 189 CE events took an even
more brutal turn. The eunuchs murdered the 'Grand General' He Jin after
it was discovered he had plotted to assemble an army to himself purge
the eunuchs. The general’s followers exacted immediate revenge by
killing all the eunuchs in the palace. With this power vacuum there then
ensued a civil war for control of the empire, with the result that the
Han fell and the Wei dynasty was established in 220 CE.
[<https://www.ancient.eu/article/1109/eunuchs-in-ancient-china/>]

Thus given such a history of national identity as the capacity for
antagonisms against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY why then there should
naturally emerge from such conflicted national identity the unique
societal programs as "ONE CHILD POLICY" or "RE-EDUCATION OF UIGHUR
MUSLIMS" as not being *POGROMS* in and of themselves, but attempts to
preserve the balance of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY against any binomial
mindset onslaught.

Thus it could be argued that since the remark: "DO YOU WANT MORE / LESS"
is capable of being conveyed by a non-offensive gesticulation (the LEFT
HAND or the RIGHT HAND) of the person making the REMARK even though
referencing a specific cultural group, it does there by, give credence
to an implied immoral or unlawful impost made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY which are themselves UNIVERSALLY defined by seven moral
proscriptions as principles of ONTIC necessity and of there being a
criminality by its stubborn non-compliance since it is reasonable to
conclude that if any of these metempirical principles are abrogated then
AUTONOMY will be adversely affected as a consequence:

CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

We conclude therefore that, the determination of the COURT breaches the
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* which is concerned with *AVOIDANCE* *OF*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* and that from a technical perspective
this dichotomy as the binomial ontological characteristic being
incommensurate can in the circumstance of speech only be reasonably
resolved by recourse to the epistemological premise at the ONTIC level.

That is by reference to the #164 - *TEMPORAL* *REVERSE* *TRANSCRIPTASE*
*INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* as its ontological dynamic *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY* and impetus for its circumscribing by a rhetorical
contrivance.

THAT OFFENCE IS CAUSED BY AN APPREHENSION AND DEFICIENCY OF THE PERSON
HEARING THE REMARK FAILING TO PROPERLY COGNIZE ITS REFERENCE AS POINT OF
PERSPECTIVE {eg: as our summation of the KOREAN CRISIS being an implicit
cognition made prior to the spasmodic #315 - *WITHDRAWAL* at the HANOI
summit} IN THE SAME MANNER THAT A REMBRANDT PAINTING HAS A POINT OF
REFERENCE AS PERSPECTIVE.

You can certainly view the painting from any perspective but only by
seeing its TRUE LINE, can the MIND of the ARTIST be properly INTERPRETED."

-- PART FOUR ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR
COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 2 March, 2019
We continue this our final stage to the FILING submission regarding the
argumentation on 'SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR
COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER' within these respective COUNTY COURT
APPEAL CASE NUMBERS: AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 /
AP-18-2202 by now making a further clarification upon the matters raised
within the accompanying letter dated 28 FEBRUARY 2019 to the COURT
#315 - *WITHDRAWAL* to the HANOI summit) as our summation of the KOREAN
CRISIS which since the ARMISTICE AGREEMENT SIGNED 27 JULY 1953 that
brought about a complete cessation of hostilities has heretofore evaded
a comprehensive, prosperous and peaceful resolution, in being only an
informal opinion (which is entirely reliant upon the patient expertise
and preparedness of respective ministerial negotiators) is consistent
with both the Oriental / Occidental perennial traditions.
It is entirely relevant to the circumstance of these MATTERS given the
proposition that the Korean War is usually included upon the same
CENOTAPH as those commemorating World War I / II theatres. Although the
following image wasn't conveyed within that FILING you can no doubt
deduce a binomial |____________| static analogy of the constitute
elements contained therein as corresponding to the alternative trinomial
agreement which we provisionally proposed within that correspondence and
against which we apply both the TRINOMIAL aggregations of ONTIC_OBLIGANS
being an articulation of the epistemological premises to the cognitive
process accompanying the autonomous necessity descriptions as morality

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
   Male: #105; Feme: #32 <-- #105 AS ROMAN HETEROS GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE
#THREE / JEWISH KABBALAH PROTOTYPE #FOUR / #315 - *QUACKING* *DUCKS*
} // #113
   Male: #279; Feme: #153
} // #315
UMBRA: #253 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance;
I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest
thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
    #VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
    #TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artiﬁce.
    #POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
    #TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
    #CANON: #104
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #150; Feme: #104
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
#315 as [#6, #200, #6, #3, #50, #10, #40] = ragan (H7279): {UMBRA: #8 as
#253 % #41 = #7} 1) to murmur, whisper; 1a) (Qal) murmurer (participle);
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to murmur; 1b2) *BACKBITER* (participle);
   Male: #265; Feme: #72
} // #315
UMBRA: #313 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
    #VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
    #POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
    #TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
    #CANON: #168
ANY {%26}),
   Male: #73; Feme: #168
Nature [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
#315 as [#2, #300, #6, #2, #5] = shuwbah (H7729): {UMBRA: #11 as #313 %
#41 = #26} 1) retirement, *WITHDRAWAL*;
   Male: #203; Feme: #153
} // #315
UMBRA: #289 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
   Male: #71; Feme: #84
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
#315 as [#10, #80, #9, #10, #200, #6] = patar (H6362): {UMBRA: #7 as
#289 % #41 = #2} 1) to separate, set free, remove, open, escape, burst
through; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *REMOVE* (*ONESELF*), *ESCAPE*; 1a2) to
set free, let out;
{%13}); Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #139; Feme: #72
} // #315
UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; I indulge not in anger.
    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the inﬁnitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {UMBRA: #14 as #315 % #41 = #28}
1) yet, still; 1a) of time; 1a1) *OF* *A* *THING* *WHICH* *WENT* *ON*
*FORMERLY*, *WHEREAS* *NOW* *A* *DIFFERENT* *STATE* *OF* *THINGS*
*EXISTS* *OR* *HAS* *BEGUN* *TO* *EXIST*; 1a2) of a thing which
continues at present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no
longer, no more; 1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2)
besides, more, further;
   Male: #107; Feme: #32
} // #113
   Male: #109; Feme: #32
} // #113
   Male: #109; Feme: #32
} // #113
UMBRA: #113 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
ENQUIRY) as [#6, #10, #6, #90, #1] / [#6, #10, #90, #1, #6] / [#1, #6,
#90, #10, #1, #5] / [#10, #6, #90, #1, #6] = yatsa' (H3318): {UMBRA: #41
as #113 % #41 = #31} 1) to go out, come out, exit, go forth; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to go or come out or forth, depart; 1a2) to go forth (to a place);
1a3) to go forward, proceed to (to or toward something); 1a4) to come or
go forth (with purpose or for result); 1a5) to come out of; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to go or come out, bring out, lead out; 1b2) to
bring out of; 1b3) to lead out; 1b4) to deliver; 1c) (Hophal) to be
brought out or forth;
agreement is independent of any sanctions deductions or goals for
diminishing nuclear weapons capacity.
What I desire to know is how North Korea 🇰🇵 intends to harness its
nuclear research for the development of a sustainable electricity supply
/ satellite based technology because without which any realisation of
potential for economic prosperity would be impossible.
If it takes 80% of the Korean nation’s scientific resources to achieve
such “potential for economic prosperity” then ipso facto there is a
“diminished nuclear weapons capacity”
My view (it’s not the first time that I have raised the electricity
supply scenario) is that the participants had not prepared sufficiently
to even be able to adopt any STATIC MECHANICS OF PROSPERITY which ought
to have been RATIFIED at the HANOI SUMMIT by A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING and then formalised at a mutually beneficial time at a
later date.
And now countries like Vietnam have lost face."
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #299; Feme: #167
} // #491
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
    #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
    #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
    #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
    #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own ﬂesh and blood.
    #CANON: #220
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
   Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as
#491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489
% #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaph.; 3) God is called
the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the corporeal
nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote ancestor, the
founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a people, forefather: so
Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie. ancestors,
forefathers, founders of a race; 1c) one advanced in years, a senior;
2a) the originator and transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors of a
family or society of persons animated by the same spirit as himself;
2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who actuates and
governs their minds; 2b) one who stands in a father's place and looks
after another in a paternal way; 2c) a title of honour; 2c1) teachers,
as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training they have
received; 2c2) the members of the Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by
virtue of the wisdom and experience in which they excelled, to take
charge of the interests of others; 3a) of the stars, the heavenly
luminaries, because he is their creator, upholder, ruler; 3b) of all
rational and intelligent beings, whether angels or men, because he is
their creator, preserver, guardian and protector; 3b1) of spiritual
beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ
have been exalted to a specially close and intimate relationship with
God, and who no longer dread him as a stern judge of sinners, but revere
him as their reconciled and loving Father; 3d) the Father of Jesus
Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest bond of
love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes, appointed to
explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation, and made to share
also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*;
3d2) by the apostles;
with the "QUACK OF DUCKS" conveyed by the insubstantial pernicious
opinions of his untrustworthy legal counsel MICHAEL COHEN {ie. the name
itself is a reprobation of Jewish piety}.
Since I am speaking only to this point (ie. the statements of legal
counsel are outside his domain of accountability) regarding the UNITED
STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN of 2018–2019 occurred from midnight
EST on 22 DECEMBER 2018 until 25 JANUARY 2019 (35 days). It was the
longest U.S. government shutdown in history, and the second federal
government shutdown involving furloughs during the presidency of Donald
Trump.
In our view as assessment made prior to the announced intention as
cessation of this unprecedented FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN and the
exact foretelling of its CONCLUSION, that this process was necessary to
properly demarcate the persistent substance being #491 - PRINCIPLE OF
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
Such clarification of AUTHORITY / POWER by the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES in our opinion was essential to the undertaking of any
FOUNDATIONAL TRILATERAL PEACE ACCORD between NORTH / SOUTH KOREA and the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which as STATIC MECHANICS OF PROSPERITY we
anticipated being RATIFIED at the HANOI SUMMIT by A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING and then formalised at a mutually beneficial time at a
later date.
For Koreans, mandarin ducks represent peace, fidelity, and plentiful
offspring. Similar to the Chinese, they believe that these ducks mate
for life. For these reasons, pairs of mandarin ducks called wedding
ducks are often given as wedding gifts and play a significant role in
Korean marriage. [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarin_duck>]
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE
EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
   Male: #246: GOAL, OBJECT, PURPOSE, INTENTION: AD PROVIDAM {#6 - TO
FORESEE / FOR PROVIDENCE} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (BINOMIAL
/ BIFURCATED) THEORY OF NUMBER; Feme: #231: JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
} // #474
#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]
@161 = #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION (#273 - SYNCRETIC
PROGRESSION) [#3, #10, #50, #800, #200, #20, #5, #300, #800] / #474 as
[#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as #1883 %
#41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;
Again we have recourse to MATTERS relating to an INFORMAL OPINION AS
RESPONSE MADE TO THE DUTCH COURT'S JUDGMENT AGAINST THE POLITICIAN GEERT
WILDERS which was then AS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE then DISTORTED AS FACTS
BY PERJURED OATHS then raised as the INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 which was determined by the SALE
MAGISTRATES COURT ON 11 JANUARY 2018 as being a HABITUAL PERVERSE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY SUSPECTED ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY
NEOPHYTES BEING AN ABSOLUTE AS CONTEMPT FOR THE #873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL associated with QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE INITIATING SITUATION OCCURRING 15 DECEMBER,
2016 WHICH HAS NOW ESCALATED TO AN INDICTMENT OF TREASON BEING MADE
CAFE (paraphrased): "Why did you put this rubbish on our CAFE Facebook
Page?"
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of
compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning "MANLY, STRONG" ...
Why should you, in relation to what things are mine and not yours, then
dictate what ought to be on my mind?
Such rubbish as YOU CALL IT because of your abject ignorance which you
make despite the absolute command given under SECTION VIII of the
Letters Patent to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING* *AND* *ASSISTING*", can earn
you a criminal charge of TREASON and 25 years imprisonment (if I wish to
pursue that matter against you), as a contempt of your life and business
towards the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN
PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of
the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Why did you celebrate Christmas with a lunch on this 14th December, 2016
when are you given to such hypocrisy and depravity of being with no
claim that you can make of *JESUS* *CHRIST* *AS* *YOU* *ARE* *A*
*HYPOCRITE* *AND* *A* *GODLESS* *LIAR*?
Stick to croissants and coffee--but leave the things which are mine to
my concern.
DOLF: "Who was it who wrote those ignorant comments in relation to my
attendance here yesterday?"
CAFE: "I want you to leave my business now or I will call the police."
[Showed a contemptuous disdain by a backhanded flicking refuse away
DOLF (paraphrase): "That is fine by me.
Because whether it is yourself, POLLYANNAR BIG PICTURE PHOTOGRAPHER or
REDD CATT CAFE, I will neither keep the company with fascist whores nor
to transact any business with those who come here to this country so as
to show such disrespect for the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES of our COMMONWEALTH.
You cannot thereby claim any piety, specially Christian identity (but
not limited to), your house is now desolate and anyone who does business
with you will now similarly lose their prospect of eternity."
"AND HE CAUSETH ALL, BOTH SMALL AND GREAT, RICH AND POOR, FREE AND BOND,
TO RECEIVE A MARK IN THEIR RIGHT HAND, OR IN THEIR FOREHEADS: AND THAT
NO MAN MIGHT BUY OR SELL, SAVE HE THAT HAD THE MARK, OR THE NAME OF THE
BEAST, OR THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME. HERE IS WISDOM. LET HIM THAT HATH
UNDERSTANDING COUNT THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST: FOR IT IS THE NUMBER OF A
MAN; AND HIS NUMBER IS SIX HUNDRED THREESCORE AND SIX (#666)."
[Revelation 13:14-18 (KJV)]
DOLF: "Go back to where you came from."
have reported you and I will take out an intervention order against you
if you persist in this manner."
been entirely in compliance with NATURE, LAW, ORDER and the JUSTICE of
this LAND as SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES which are defined by a Natural /
Common Law statement as to the existence of an egalitarian right and
that was in accord with such mathematical theoretical noumenon as
Intellectual Property of mine, and with specific regard to the computed
#287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): 1)
necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected
by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO*
*THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*
As that which was required as action of mindful compliance given by you
in the circumstances AS MY LAWFUL demand granted in the prudent and
reasonable exercise of MY PREROGATIVE AS AUTHORITY made in regard to a
submission given to SECTION VIII of the Letters Patent as defining the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES
encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Should your improper, impertinent, unrepentant and bellicose as
threatening public conduct such as this statement: "I will take out an
intervention order against you if you persist in this manner" continue.
I will recommend to the magistrate that a charge of TREASON pursuant to
Section 9A of the Crimes Act (1958) Victoria be brought against you and
that all the necessary documents relative to any successful prosecution
to the charge (as referenced here) have been already served on you.
I will bring your fascist conduct therefore into a proper mindfulness of
contrition and a duty before the law.
Do you understand that?"
PREAMBLE AS NOTICE GIVEN TO THE SALE MAGISTRATES COURT ON 11 JANUARY
2016 OF AN IMPENDING INDICTMENT
1.    These are the material details of Complaint as an Indictment for
"Crimes Against Humanity as War Crimes Constituting Treason" which is
now made to the Sale Magistrates Court on this day of 11 January, 2017
and provided prior to such Court of competent legal jurisdiction,
' I AM NOW INTENT ON PROCEEDING WITH THE TABLING OF A COMPLAINT TO YOU
ALL OF "CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY" AS "WAR CRIMES" CONSTITUTING TREASON'
of 1952 HOURS on 3 January, 2017
'THIS IS A NOTICE OF AN IMPENDING INDICTMENT FOR "CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY" AS "WAR CRIMES" CONSTITUTING TREASON' of 0834 HOURS on 5
January, 2017
2.    And which was made to the following persons, specific interest
- Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission
- Police Ethical Standards and Conduct Unit
SINCE I CONTINUE TO BE SUBJECT TO IRRATIONAL #419 - IMPOSTS MADE UPON MY
AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202 ARE
PRESENTLY BEFORE THE COURTS, A CULTURAL DENIAL (25 YEARS) FAIR POLICING,
LACK OF VIABLE AND WILLING LEGAL REPRESENTATION (THE VICTORIAN JUDICIAL
SYSTEM IS CORRUPT) AND UNBIASED COURT JUDGMENTS, ACCORDINGLY *I* *AM*
*PUBLICLY* *CONVEYING* *MY* *INTENTION* *TO* *SEEK* *POLITICAL* *ASYLUM*
*AND* *RETAINING* *TO* *OURSELVES* *SUCH* *SAPIENT* *TECHNOLOGY* *AS*
*INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *THEREBY**REDUCING* *THE* *AUSTRALIAN*
*COMMONWEALTH*, *THE* *NATION* *AND* *THE* *AUTONOMY* *OF* *ITS*
*PEOPLE* *TO* *A* *QUARRY* *OF* *OPPORTUNISM* *FOR* *RESOURCES* *BY*
*ANOTHER* *SOVEREIGNTY*.
THERE IS NO HOSPITABLE LIFE TO BE ENJOYED WITHIN THIS COUNTRY.
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]
strikes at the very heart of Dutch Justice against the sovereign
'DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF THESE FUCK KNUCKLE REPROBATE ISLAMISTS?'
By such is demanded that the weighty matter as trinomial SCALES OF
JUSTICE are firstly placed within a PROPER BALANCE by the COURT before
#523 as [#5, #200, #300, #1, #9, #8] = histemi (G2476): {UMBRA: #35 as
#523 % #41 = #31} 1) to cause or make to stand, to place, put, set; 2)
to stand; 1a) *TO* *BID* *TO* *STAND* *BY*, [*SET* *UP*]; 1a1) *IN*
*THE* *PRESENCE* *OF* *OTHERS*, *IN* *THE* *MIDST*, *BEFORE* *JUDGES*,
before members of the Sanhedrin;; 1a2) to place; 1b) to make firm, fix
establish; 1b1) to cause a person or a thing to keep his or its place;
1b2) *TO* *STAND*, *BE* *KEPT* *INTACT* (*OF* *FAMILY*, *A* *KINGDOM*),
*TO* *ESCAPE* *IN* *SAFETY*; 1b3) *TO* *ESTABLISH* *A* *THING*, *CAUSE*
*IT* *TO* *STAND*; 1b31) *TO* *UPHOLD* *OR* *SUSTAIN* *THE* *AUTHORITY*
*OR* *FORCE* *OF* *ANYTHING*; 1c) *TO* *SET* *OR* *PLACE* *IN* *A*
*BALANCE*; 1c1) to weigh: money to one (because in very early times
before the introduction of coinage, the metals used to be weighed); 2a)
to stand by or near; 2a1) to stop, stand still, to stand immovable,
stand firm; 2a1a) of the foundation of a building; 2b) to stand; 2b1)
*CONTINUE* *SAFE* *AND* *SOUND*, *STAND* *UNHARMED*, *TO* *STAND*
*READY* *OR* *PREPARED*; 2b2) to be of a steadfast mind; 2b3) of
quality, one who does not hesitate, does not waiver;
And the court be not unduly prejudiced in any lesser or more degree by
the circumstance of irreconcilable dichotomies of sensibility and
circumscribing reality by those which have recourse to a binomial
methodology for professing there are only two sides to a coin. My client
GEERT WILDERS is innocent of the obscenity which is here Dutch Justice.
Mangoes Rice & Cream
PS. This is a parody and such travesty is lawful when artistic merit is
claimed”
respectful objection (ie. as then INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016) made of the DUTCH JUDICATORY'S
DETERMINATION AGAINST POLITICIAN GEERT WILDERS ISLAMIC DEFAMATION which
we have always maintained (ie. within 24 hours of its determinations and
our intuition conveyed then has been hereby ratified is the impost upon
the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic) is against the notional binomial
dichotomy of a MORE / LESS construct is that the regime of piety defines
its nomenclature of belief as an antagonism made against autonomy itself.
Realizing that from our informal analysis made of the VOC experience
having recourse to Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 which has cognition
of TRINOMIAL NUMBER) such antagonism against autonomy itself being in
this instance an absconded sailor, we recognize by the NATURE of the
dialog conforming to implicit and exacting CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
which itself frames our knowledge of there being a TRINOMIAL paradigm
capable by REASON of unambiguously and equitably defining SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY, that the capacity for VOC as an organisation to function with
the traditional binomial notion of STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE is in all
probability due to such TRINOMIAL PARADIGM / BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY being
capable of an orbital and sub-ordinate characteristic of STATEHOOD.
The concern over the MORE / LESS binary construct is that by there being
an implied antagonism against AUTONOMY itself as an attribution of
STATEHOOD {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN}, it is thereby inferring a TRINOMIAL
construct and a consideration is then made in juxtaposition to a regime
of piety which defines itself by a binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic
as its nomenclature against a principle of STATE which is itself defined
as a trinomial construct of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.
I make the further observation that any postulation made of the binomial
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic which has an embodiment within the #325 -
IDEA of it being accomplished by a CANONICAL TRANSPOSITION (ie. BINOMIAL
EIGHT {
#1 + #2 = #3;
#3 + #4 = #7;
#5 + #6 = #11;
#7 + #8 = #15
AS TOTALLING #36 WITH A MAGIC SUM #111 / #666
} ELEMENT METATHESIS OF TRANSPOSITION AGAINST NINE ELEMENT TRINOMIAL
NUMBER AS EXHIBITING AN #65 / #260 (#64 ELEMENTS) ANALOGY WITH #1
RETENTION) as an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD proposition made against the
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
In having an historical precedent as the characteristic of EUNUCHS both
in the embodiment of criminal punishment / loss of autonomy such as the
instance of WANG FU (eunuch) within the HAN DYNASTY (206 BCE to 220 CE)
which is exhibited by the story in 172 CE, when EMPRESS DOWAGER DOU MIAO
'ALL THAT IS UNDER THE HEAVEN IS IN UPHEAVAL.
CAO AND WANG MURDERED THE EMPRESS DOWAGER.
THE KEY OFFICIALS ONLY KNOW HOW TO BE OFFICIALS AND HAD NOTHING FAITHFUL
TO SAY.' [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Fu_(eunuch)>]
FROM SLAVES TO POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS
Eunuchs, or 'non-men' as they could be known, first appeared in the
royal courts of ancient pre-imperial Chinese states where they were
employed as servants in the inner chambers of the palace. They were more
or less slaves and were usually acquired as children from border
territories, especially those to the south. Castrated and brought to
serve the royal household, they had no real means of altering their
lives. Eunuchs were *REGARDED* *AS* *THE* *MOST* *TRUSTWORTHY* *OF*
*SERVANTS* *BECAUSE* *THEY* *COULD* *NEITHER* *SEDUCE* *WOMEN* *OF*
*THE* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *FATHER* *CHILDREN* *WHICH* *MIGHT* *FORM* *A*
*DYNASTY* to rival that of the sitting emperor’s.
Eunuchs were powerful political players in ancient Chinese government.
Originating as trusted slaves in the royal household they were ambitious
to use their favoured position to gain political power. Advising the
emperor from within the palace and blocking the access of officials to
their ruler, the eunuchs were eventually able to acquire noble titles
themselves, form a bureaucracy to rival the state’s and even select and
remove emperors of their choosing. Their influence on government would
result in the falling of dynasties and last right up to the 17th century
CE.
Very often the eunuchs encouraged and made worse political factions,
which damaged the unity of the government. Eunuchs are charged with
playing a major part in the fall of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE).
During the 2nd century CE, in particular, a succession of weak emperors
were easily manipulated by the eunuchs at court. In 124 CE they even put
their own child candidate on the imperial throne. They gained more
imperial favour and further entrenched their position in 159 CE by
helping Emperor Huan settle a family succession dispute. In gratitude,
the emperor awarded a noble title to five leading eunuchs.
The eunuchs’ even greater power ultimately resulted in government
officials and students banding together and staging protests in 166 and
168-169 CE. The eunuchs would not be put off so lightly though and they
instigated a wave of purges which saw many of those involved in the
protests imprisoned and 100 executed. The luckier officials, students,
and intellectuals who had spoken out against eunuch power were merely
excluded from ever holding public office. In 189 CE events took an even
more brutal turn. The eunuchs murdered the 'Grand General' He Jin after
it was discovered he had plotted to assemble an army to himself purge
the eunuchs. The general’s followers exacted immediate revenge by
killing all the eunuchs in the palace. With this power vacuum there then
ensued a civil war for control of the empire, with the result that the
Han fell and the Wei dynasty was established in 220 CE.
[<https://www.ancient.eu/article/1109/eunuchs-in-ancient-china/>]
Thus given such a history of identity as the capacity for antagonisms
against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY why then there should naturally emerge
from such conflicted national identity such societal programs as "ONE
CHILD POLICY" or "RE-EDUCATION OF UIGHUR MUSLIMS" as not being *POGROMS*
but attempts to preserve the balance of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY against any
binomial mindset onslaught.
Thus it could be argued that since the remark: "DO YOU WANT MORE / LESS"
is capable of being conveyed by a non-offensive gesticulation (the LEFT
HAND or the RIGHT HAND) of the person making the REMARK even though
referencing a specific cultural group, it does there by give credence to
an implied immoral or unlawful impost made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY which are themselves UNIVERSALLY defined by seven moral
proscriptions as principles of ONTIC necessity and of there being a
criminality by its non-compliance since it is reasonable to conclude
that if any of these metempirical principles are abrogated then AUTONOMY
CAN GENESIS ITSELF {ie. COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]}
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451 = Y-M-T-A
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE*
*SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*
We conclude therefore that, the determination of the COURT breaches the
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY which is concerned with *AVOIDANCE* *OF*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* and that from a technical perspective
this dichotomy as the binomial ontological characteristic being
incommensurate can in the circumstance of speech only be reasonably
resolved by recourse to the epistemological premise at the ontic level.
That is by reference to the temporal reverse transcriptase inhibitor as
impetus for its circumscribing as a rhetorical contrivance.
THAT OFFENCE IS CAUSED BY AN APPREHENSION AND DEFICIENCY OF THE PERSON
HEARING THE REMARK FAILING TO PROPERLY COGNIZE ITS REFERENCE AS POINT OF
PERSPECTIVE IN THE SAME MANNER THAT A REMBRANDT PAINTING HAS A POINT OF
REFERENCE AS PERSPECTIVE.
You can certainly view the painting from any perspective but only by
seeing its TRUE LINE, can the MIND of the ARTIST be properly INTERPRETED."
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#114),
IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
    Male: #280; Feme: #225
} // #873
UMBRA: #94 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
    #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
    #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
    #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
    #CANON: #148
   Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN
VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
TO BE CONTINUED ...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%204%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
Initial Post: 10 December 2018

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.